Crazy Cat

I hope you kept copies. USCIS has been known to lose things.

Typo. I meant paper trail...LOL. My mistake. A continual chain of evidence from date of submission of the I-751 until current date. He wanted to ensure we were still living in marital union.

During our I-751 interview, the officer wanted to see a paper trial of our living together from the time we submitted the I-751 until the day of the interview. He also wanted to driver licenses, bank accounts, signed leases, deeds, etc. Good luck.

This is the full chart for police certificates:

@pushbrk How do you interpret this? I'm not sure this has always been phrased like this. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/immigrate/the-immigrant-visa-process/step-5-collect-financial-evidence-and-other-supporting-documents/step-7-collect-civil-documents.html

Sounds like normal processing after the interview. Just keep watching the CEAC status for "Issued".

Excellent idea.....

I mean it makes sure the spouse knows about the I-864 obligation.

That is always at the discretion of the Consulate Officer. For one thing, It protects the spouse of the joint sponsor since they are using joint finances.

If needed, you just submit the name change document to show a link between your old and new legal names. Besides, the NVC stage mostly concerns the beneficiaries......not the petitioner.

***I moved this thread to Tax and Finances During US Immigration*****

Resubmit again, after double checking the accuracy of everything.....Good luck.

Many consulates want the spouse of a Joint Sponsor to sign an I-864a if they file joint taxes. It sounds like you just need to find another willing, well-qualified joint sponsor who has sufficient income. Did they give her instructions on how to overcome this obstacle?

It could be scanned and emailed. However, if you have sufficient documentable income, there is no need for additional bank documents.

These two separate cases. Each case would require a letter. Once the letter is received by USCIS, he would have to restart the entire process if he wanted to petition them later.

I understand. Looks a mistake by USCIS. You, obviously, don't need an EAD. Keep us updated.

*****Similar/duplicate topics merged. Please keep question under this thread***

California's tax strategy is simply killing the goose that laid the golden egg. It will start by taxing the wealthy, then creep down the socio-economic scale as sources of tax revenue dry up. Self-destruction guaranteed.

You can safely Ignore the I-751 reminder. ***This topic has been moved to the Removing Conditions on Residency forum area***

The only card that is produced after an I-751 submission would be a 10 year Green Card.

He can either submit a letter to USCIS to withdraw the I-130s, or he can just let the cases go on to NVC (which is what I would do). The cases can sit at NVC for a year without having to do anything at all. If he later decides to continue the cases, they can be continued. No reason has to be given for either route.

A lot of people being depicted in parody now.

I think media people are too quick to see the R word intent in simple parody. Some people let their bias shade what others intend as parody..... I guess people see things differently. just my opinion.

It depicted a LOT of politicians as different animals.......big deal (sarcasm).... News Flash: Not everything is racist.

@Edward and Jaycel is correct. CURRENT annual income is always king. There is no need to use both income and assets. Notice what the I-134 instructions say: "Item Number 18. Assets. Provide information about any assets you will use to support the beneficiary for the anticipated period of his or her stay. List only assets that can be converted into cash within 12 months and that will be used to support the beneficiary while the beneficiary is in the United States. Provide the value of all assets listed in U.S. dollars, regardless of whether they are held in the United States or outside of the United States. Do not include assets from any individuals named in Part 3." Fun Fact: The I-134 for a K-1 is valid for only 90 days, and is actually not enforceable or legally binding. The I-864, which you submit after marriage, is valid much, much longer, and IS enforceable. Three separate courts have held that the Form I-134 was not enforceable against a sponsor by a state agency seeking to recover the medical costs incurred by the sponsored immigrant.1 The courts held that that affidavit of support does not form a legal contract but represents only a moral obligation. Having said that, most all consults will require an I-134 to help determine if the visa holder will become a public charge. This is to protect the visa holder and taxpayers. If current annual income is sufficient, I would skip the assets declaration.