randomstairs
-
Posts
714 -
Joined
-
Last visited
1 Follower
Immigration Timeline & Photos
randomstairs's Achievements
-
Are you talking about the receipt # or the I-94 number? Unless the form has changed, the I-94 # is a series of numbers. It's different on every new I-797. How do you know the correct number? Sorry if I'm not understanding something basic here. I'm not sure if the current I-797A will be needed, but it's likely. If you know the printing error, simply mention that to the new employer and they can make a note of it and include it in the application package. The error should be then corrected by USCIS together with the approval of the new application. -
The new employer can file a new H1B case, yes. You'll get a new I797 form if approved. How do you know that there's a printing mistake?
-
Was your Form I-360 approved or not? What is the attorney saying?
-
SalishSea reacted to a post in a topic:
Will I be eligible to apply for naturalization?
-
appleblossom reacted to a post in a topic:
Will I be eligible to apply for naturalization?
-
appleblossom reacted to a post in a topic:
Will I be eligible to apply for naturalization?
-
Unless you are not IN FACT only visiting the US while actually residing abroad, as seems to be the case here.
-
OldUser reacted to a post in a topic:
Will I be eligible to apply for naturalization?
-
OldUser reacted to a post in a topic:
Will I be eligible to apply for naturalization?
-
randomstairs reacted to a post in a topic:
Will I be eligible to apply for naturalization?
-
randomstairs reacted to a post in a topic:
Will I be eligible to apply for naturalization?
-
For start, you shouldn't refer to a foreign country as "home." Your home is in the US, or you are seriously violating the LPR status.
-
randomstairs reacted to a post in a topic:
Will I be eligible to apply for naturalization?
-
If you formally state that you weren't living in the US permanently during that year, the actual dates notwithstanding, you violated the continuous residence requirement. That would be technically true even if you were physically present in the US the whole time. As an LPR you are required to permanently reside in the US, but you are stating here that this wasn't the case.
-
randomstairs reacted to a post in a topic:
N400 Interview Experience Brooklyn Field Office
-
OldUser reacted to a post in a topic:
Travelling outside US during presidential change. Risk of re entry
-
The public charge applies to those seeking to become LPRs, not to current green card holders. So, that's not gonna affect you. There's no requirement to apply for naturalization, nor to be approved for it if one applies. This, too, isn't gonna be an issue for you. As long as you don't stay abroad for too long, you'll be fine. If you've already filed the new N-400, it may be a good idea to wait for the citizenship, this time around - just so you don't miss it again.
-
P055UM reacted to a post in a topic:
Trump admin immigration changes? [merged threads]
-
P055UM reacted to a post in a topic:
Trump admin immigration changes? [merged threads]
-
That's not a serious argument. Are unlawful non-citizens not subject to the US jurisdiction? If so, then how can the US even enforce its laws against them? Do they have the diplomatic immunity? I read it somewhere on the internet: her own Twitter ("now X") feed.
-
yuna628 reacted to a post in a topic:
Trump admin immigration changes? [merged threads]
-
That's not a serious challenge. The wording is unambiguous: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
-
Candance Owens who promotes extreme antisemitic conspiracy theories? That Candace Owens?
-
TiffAndMike reacted to a post in a topic:
Trump admin immigration changes? [merged threads]
-
This might be a ToS violation. You can't just accuse someone of lying about the most fundamental aspects of their lives just because you don't like them. Unless you provide strong evidence for Harris's not being born in the US, this is blatant slander, and, at the very least, inflammatory language.
-
It is an outlandish idea because it proposes amending the 14th Amendment, which provides for a lot more than just the birthright citizenship. In fact, it may be one of the most fundamental parts of the post-Civil War Constitution.
-
randomstairs reacted to a post in a topic:
Trump admin immigration changes? [merged threads]
-
If there was no plea it most likely won't count as a conviction. They may still enquire about what actually happened.
-
Did the defendant enter a guilty plea? If not, the lack of conviction will probably make them eligible for the visa (not a conviction for USCIS purposes). But, if conviction for immigration purposes has been established, this offense may count as a CIMT (crime involving moral turpitude), which could preclude the applicant from being admitted. Talking to a lawyer may be a good idea.
