Ban Hammer

not at worst............ - Unlawful Presence (Civil Violation): Remaining in the U.S. after a visa has expired (a common scenario for nearly half of all undocumented immigrants) is a civil infraction. This is handled through civil removal (deportation) proceedings, which do not carry criminal penalties like prison time, though they can result in being barred from re-entry for a number of years. - Improper Entry (Crime): The act of entering or attempting to enter the U.S. at a place not designated for inspection by immigration officers is a federal misdemeanor offense. - Re-entry After Removal (Crime): If an individual has been previously formally removed (deported) from the U.S. and then returns without authorization, that is a felony offense

yes to all. time does not erase the crime.

perhaps you missed the word "includes"

of course not, she'd want a new car then!

so it prohibits open carry?

right neck? how many necks do you have?

makes one wonder if that's why kamala chose him.

one post removed for tos violation. one post removed for quoting that post. admin action has been taken.

thread locked pending review

now you are just grasping at straws.

no, i'm sure the entire case hinged on the part about shooting continuing after the suspect was down. not only not in the same ball park, not even the same game.

apparently there is an issue understanding "the threat is neutralized"

the above is from your link. it's not even in the same ball park. still don't bet the farm on it.

i'll consider that when i see a link to such. the rule of thumb is to shoot until the threat is neutralized. this was 3 shots (not 5 as earlier stated) in rapid succession. i wouldn't suggest betting the farm on that claim you made.

that's nonsense.

in the first, i'd have just put my hands up at that point in the 3rd, i'd have waited as i'd been expecting either a cop or another car chasing them (possible drive by or gangs having a dispute)

that's quite dismissive. there's videos out there - try youtube.

that you've seen. some of us have seen video evidence, and in slow motion - yes, she hit him.

amusing given the driver was shot only after she struck one with her vehicle.

the driver was not shot for "...interfering with federal officers."

no, the normal expectation would be to know something about firearms and how ineffective that tactic would be: - this isn't a hollywood movie, where every cop is an olympic level pistol shooter who always hits what he aims at. - the tires presented a smaller profile than the driver and were obscured by the vehicle - take a tape measure and see how far you are from the front of a vehicle before you can even see the tires. - shooting tires out does not stop the vehicle and is not a time sensitive way to end the threat - bullets ricochet - shooting at tires will result in bullets that miss (and reference the first point - there's a lot, look up the percentage of misses in officer shootings) and you'll have everyone within 200 yards in danger.

he's all fleas and no hat.

that's part of the patrol officer fitness test..........