Dashinka

Sums it up pretty good. It is amazing that the Left/Progressives always want to repeat the same mistakes expecting a different result. My Socialist Mayor Part 2 Public transport is a good example of socialist confusion about what makes things work. I ask people, “Who do you think built New York’s subways?” Most say: “the government.” Who else could afford to dig tunnels and buy trains so everyone, rich and poor, can ride? Private businesses wouldn’t do it. They wouldn’t be able to charge enough to cover their costs. That’s why government must do it! But actually, private companies built most of New York’s subways. The trains only became government-run after 1939, when the capitalists proposed raising the fare from 5 to 7 cents. NYC’s mayor called that “a grab for the public’s pocket” and took control. https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/08/17/my-socialist-mayor-part-2/

Follow the money.... Can we now label these groups as BIG E? Polar Bears Thriving, Bees Buzzing—So Why the Hysteria? Unmasking the Tactics of Big Green Once upon a time, the big threat to development was NIMBY: Not In My Back Yard. Today, it’s BANANA: Build Absolutely Nothing, Anywhere, Near Anyone. “What that means is we don’t get the lifestyle that we want,” says Fisher. “If you wanted to build a new house, what kind of permits do you have to get? Who do you have to talk to? Is the Sierra Club going to sue?” I’m ashamed that I once fell for their scams. WCBS TV even ran ads promoting my environmental reporting with a headline that said, “If you wore a gas mask … you might be better off.” Now I realize that the big environmental groups fed me lies. https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/07/20/big-energy-got-rich-feeding-people-lies/

Hmm, surprise, surprise, people lie to other people to avoid confrontation. What else is new? Cost of Conformity: 88% of Students Feel Compelled to Adopt Liberal-Left Facade, Study Finds And this loss is profound. The researchers argued that ideological conformity stifles authenticity, a quality “once considered a psychological good,” but now “a social liability.” Students, they say, “learn to compartmentalize. Publicly, they conform; privately, they question—often in isolation.” This dissonance fractures identity and halts personal growth, as students trade genuine self-discovery for survival. So, within the classroom, what does this look like? According to the research, 78% self-censor on gender identity, 77% on politics, and 68% on family values. Alarmingly, 80% admit to submitting classwork that misrepresents their beliefs to align with professors’ expectations—a practice so ingrained it’s become “second nature” for many. And unfortunately, this “fragmentation doesn’t end at the classroom door.” Some 73% of respondents confessed they don’t even trust having “conversations about these values with close friends,” adding: “Nearly half said they routinely conceal beliefs in intimate relationships for fear of ideological fallout.” https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/08/17/cost-of-conformity-88-of-students-feel-compelled-to-adopt-liberal-left-facade-study-finds/

Trying to figure out how Turley was wrong? He is not suggesting creating a new state, but rather allowing most of the area, primarily the residential areas, to go back to Maryland.

Moved to US Citizenship General Discussion Forum.

Not sure it really matters relative to getting easier questions. Just give an acceptable answer and move on IMO. Good Luck!

Another further complication is with the older kids now outside the U.S. they cannot AOS anymore.

Yes, combo cards were stopped in April 2022 right around the time she filed the I360. I am not completely up to speed on the I360, does that cover the children as well? I do love the story saying she was living legally in the U.S. under a “combo card”. It was really her I360/I485 receipt that allowed for authorized stay. Of course the question now is that since she abandoned her I485 via the I360 is her EAD even valid anymore?

You can email them, and also bring it up at the interview. Good Luck!

Yes, the pendulum swings. I am curious as to how you believe she was actually admissible short of being given HP?

Having to say what? Doesn't she now have a fairly large charity site now, seems her savings is growing. Where does the discretion end? What if discretion is used and it turns out it is not the case of a relatively harmless person entering the US at the discretion of a CBP officer that just met her. The simple fact is this was her issue and her consequences. Your spouse got lucky, he could have easily been turned around as CBP does not always follow what the DoS says. Anyway, it is enough of the debate, she had no documentation to re-enter the US, sure detention was probably not the best course, but I doubt she could return to Canada. If she had come to VJ, would you have advised her to go to Canada without AP?

Is she paying for detention? How is her savings being depleted? Also, I am not aware of airlines having discretion relative to allowing anyone to board a flight without some form of documentation accepted in the Carrier Guide. I imagine if an airline employee let's someone on a plane without proper or verified entrance documentation, it could be that employee paying for the cost of having to fly the person back. In the end, it is the person's responsibility to have their documents in order (not sure where you are going with "paperwork error", elaborate please. I can imagine what it is like for her and her family, but it of her own making. When she left the US without proper re-entry documentation or a valid visa, what was the CBP officer supposed to do? Ideally, she would have been turned around, I don't believe someone from NZ has to have a visa for Canada, so she could have returned to the airport and got on the next flight to Auckland.

I agree, Canada was not really an option.

Why is that? If she had been trying to check in for a flight to the US with her situation, would she have been allowed to board? Why does she deserve special treatment for not having her documents in order?

Sure they do, CBP also has the discretion to not parole her in. This is really on her though, she needed to make sure she had proper documentation to re-enter.

Hard to say in this environment. Would she be deported to NZ? What basis did she have to re-enter the US?

Even if CBP had paroled her in, she would have needed to re-start the AOS filing. Isn't that what we always advise folks that are going through the AOS process in the US regardless of the basis for that AOS. If one leaves the US with a pending AOS and no AP, the AOS package is null.

Except when one leaves the US with a pending AOS and no approved AP. Sounds like it may be very inconvenient for her now.

Yes, you can clarify the DS160 with the updated travel dates at the interview. I am not aware of if you can change/update the current DS160 or if it can be, how to do it (I think there might be a way, but it most likely is a royal pain). Good Luck!

Nope, they are, or were poo.

Never been to DC, but what you described is similar to many large cities in decline.

This one is even worse. What are both parts of a visa? https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/nz-woman-detained-in-us-may-be-released-this-week-says-father/3PG6WB7RYNBWZLRWH2H4OEC2NE/

Appears to be a VAWA AOS.

Doesn't seem so. She may want to find a different attorney when this is their advice. So the lawyer is advocating separating families? “I told her, yes, you don’t have a travel document, but you’ve only been gone about a day. Just explain what happened to the immigration officials.” Although Shaw lacked a travel document, her son Isaac had one, according to Thorward. “There was absolutely no reason for him to be detained. It’s unconscionable,” she said.

How could she have a combo card if her AP was not yet approved which is what the next sentence indicates. Not really sure it is the simple administrative error her now attorney says it is.