Dashinka

I agree with @TBoneTX recommendations. Yes, at the N400 they will review your entire immigration history, and there should be a note there from your AOS interview, and you can repeat the explanation at the N400 interview. You should be fine as the I129F was most likely sent back to USCIS at some point and has long since expired. Good Luck!

Progress? Of course the question is why is there a housing crisis? Hmmm, maybe it has everything to do with government over regulation.... Btw, I really expect the DSA candidates (Communists) 🤫will look at similar types of tax schemes. Aussies lose it over ‘spare bedroom tax’ plot A radical proposal to tax spare bedrooms in family homes in a bid to fix the housing crisis has sparked widespread outrage from Aussies. The idea was just one of many controversial tax plans floated by industry leaders and economists during last week’s Economic Reform Roundtable. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has refused to rule out new taxes in coming budgets, raising questions about which ones he will likely try to implement, and when. Mr Chalmers emerged with from the productivity summit last week with the conclusion that the tax system was “imperfect” and skewed in favour of the older generations. https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/australian-economy/aussies-lose-it-over-spare-bedroom-tax-plot/news-story/fa8b29b9f166966214eadbb482dbff15

Never allowed derivatives under the IR category. Derivatives are allowed under the Family Preference categories (F1, F2A, F2B, F3, and F4). This case contains a mix that spans the categories. For the wife of the OP, her parents now would be IR5 hence no derivatives (unfortunately LPRs are not able to sponsor parents, but USCs can), and siblings would be F4, or F2A/F2B depending on the situation at time of filing.

Moving this to Effects of Major Family Changes on Immigration Benefits forum as it seems to fit better there.

Deal with the divorce, and picking up after it. No need except for any address changes. Changes you to a 5 yr rule filing, and you will need to show the divorce decree. Good Luck!

Read through the USCIS Policy manual updates per the 8/1 Update Alert, and still not seeing the scare mongering the lawyer (Sapochnick) is bringing up. AOS via any non-dual intent NIV was always considered somewhat risky, maybe a little more scrutiny is better by USCIS instead of just rubber stamping them. We also know that if one is AOSing from a NIV and the AOS is denied, the accrued overstay time of the beneficiary can now become an issue. I am also wondering why the lawyer referred to a green card application for those that entered illegally? Entering the US without inspection bars almost all from AOSing (CAA, Asylum, Refugee, etc. being notable exemptions). If I entered the US illegally, and did not fall under an exemption category, I don't think I would want USCIS to know my personal information. Anyway, not really seeing a lot of change in the policy manual based on what the lawyer stated in their solicitation blog.

Proterra. Ban Hammer is right, "green" is the new grift. One wonders how much money the right people from Lion or Proterra got before the companies went under. From the story below, why didn't Iowa City go with Gillig (proper spelling, the story below has it wrong) to begin with? https://www.thegazette.com/local-government/iowa-city-transit-will-add-more-electric-buses-despite-challenges-with-current-fleet/

Never actually been to one. There are a few nearby, but definitely not a first or for that matter any choice of anyone I know.

Kind of predictable.

Travel between France and the US is fairly easy even as a married couples.

You are at the I751 phase right now, citizenship is only about 18-24 months away. Maybe focus on building your viewers with some US based content, maybe a little outside the US as well.

Writes itself.

With the Russian government now restricting, and possibly outright closing WhatsApp and Telegram, how are people communicating with family, fiancés, or spouses in Russia?

Not submitting all the required evidence with the I129F is fairly common. As to the K1 phase, not proving the relationship is real is another common reason. Good Luck!

You need to wait at least 4 more days right?

Wildfire reconstruction…

New information to me especially for those entering on a CR1/IR1, essentially nullifying 90 day early filing. Though I would think one could argue an Involuntary Separation for the 90 or so days. Thanks for the education. One to add to the knowledge bank like the issue that can occur when someone files electronically the minute the window opens.

Curious as to why a 90 day early filing for a spousal visa (IR1/CR1) would not fall under the Involuntary Separation exception.

How so? USCIS allows for 90 day early filing which opened for the OP in late May 2025 based on an IR1 entry date of 8/26/2022. By the time an interview occurred, the OP would have passed 3 yrs.

Looks like it. I would still wait until you receive notice your initial filing was withdrawn before submitting a new one. Good Luck!

Ok, now I am confused. Given the date 8/26/2022 when you got your GC and filing under the 3 yr rule, you can file after 5/28/2025. You filed 6/24/2025, so what is the problem?

If it were me, I would create a statement, and take it with him to the interview unless there is a way to establish paternity prior. He can explain the situation to the IO as they are reviewing his N400, and they can decide if the child should be added to the form. He might also want to get a consult from a good immigration attorney as this is not a common situation. Good Luck!

If you did not meet the marital union requirement with your initial filing, how do you meet it now?

I would qualify this to be the "suspected" biological child of the OP's spouse. Until this is established, the relationship is just a friend. How would the OP's spouse prove a biological relationship at this point? The only option I see is a DNA test since the father is not listed on the BC.

The executive order is not a blanket ban on Muslim's getting visas, but rather restrictions based on the uncooperative nature of several governments some of which are leading Muslim majority countries. Tunisia is not on the list. This might be helpful. Good Luck!