Dashinka

So essentially one of those circus trials we see in Russia.

I agree, I also used screenshots for some of my benefits as well including MetLife, and we had no issues. Good Luck!

Two witnesses? Why not just randomly pick 12 from Manhattan, and have the trial? Should be over in a day or two. Trump will be found guilty as orchestrated, and let the appeals begin.

I have to ask, is "Hijabi" politically correct?

You can send it in to the address shown on you NOA1 (petition receipt) noting the case number reference, and keep a copy in case USCIS does not match this up to your case and you eventually receive an RFE. Best case is you send it in, USCIS connects it to you petition, and the case moves forward. On a side note, this was the one RFE (my then fiancé not signing the letter of intent, just sending me the Word document to include) my now wife and I received on our case from K1 all the way through her N400. It is not an end of the world situation, and honestly it will not completely sidetrack the petition if one comes, but you can potentially head it off since you already know the issue. Good Luck!

You mentioned you have the history of you vaccinations, I assumed it was on the DS-3025 form. Regardless, if your K1 medical exam and all vaccinations are complete, you should be fine at the AOS stage. Good Luck!

The best way to rectify it is to have your fiancé sign a new one and email it to you (a scanned photo, or copy should work fine). Otherwise, I agree, an RFE is likely at the USCIS stage.

Consequences. Berkeley Eats Its Own At the first of the dinners, with dozens of students seated in Chemerinsky’s backyard, Malak Afaneh, co‑president of LSJP, arose with a microphone and launched into a speech. The rest is captured on video. Chemerinsky politely asks Afaneh to leave. Having slept through her constitutional law course, apparently, Afaneh insists that she is legally entitled to address a captive audience at a private residence. (“The National Lawyers Guild has informed us this is our First Amendment right,” she says. She should find better representation.) Chemerinsky’s wife then attempts to grab the microphone and places her hand on Afaneh’s shoulder, and subsequently her arm. (Chemerinsky would later state that Afaneh “shoved” his wife, but this is not evident in the footage.) Afaneh promptly shifts to victim mode, lecturing Chemerinsky about his wife’s “assault” on a “Muslim Palestinian hijabi student,” and declaring that they’ll be hearing from her lawyers. Afaneh and several other students then left the premises. Afaneh and her supporters have used the event as a launching pad for a cry-bullying campaign. The school’s pro-Palestine faculty group announced that it “stand[s] with Malak,” and “condemn[s] the violent and racist actions” of Chemerinsky and his wife. The LSJP, meantime, insisted that a “Palestinian Muslim” had suffered an unprovoked attack. The group published a truncated video of the confrontation, then accused Chemerinsky of engaging in a “pattern” of “disingenuity.” They claimed that he has “led the charge in suppressing Palestinian liberation work at the law school,” and called on him and his wife (a fellow law professor) to resign. Chemerinsky said that he was “deeply saddened” by what took place. But what is he going to do about it? As the posters, the interrupted dinner, and the post-disruption spin show, Berkeley Law is beset by self-absorbed, belligerent activists. The school is also riddled with anti-Semitic student groups that allegedly ban “Zionist” speakers, or require leaders to attend a “Palestine 101” training session (held by the good folks at LSJP). Perhaps the school should reorient its admissions process to find people who—heaven forfend—just want to focus on obtaining a sound legal education? Chemerinsky, as dean, is uniquely well positioned to push things in that direction, but almost certainly won’t. On this front, in fact, he was last seen, caught by secret camera, explaining how to smuggle discriminatory standards into the school’s faculty hiring process. https://www.city-journal.org/article/berkeley-eats-its-own

I know for myself, I will only vote on Election Day as I can see my vote is counted right there (I know, machine hacking is possible). That being said, the GOP should follow the same early voting, vote by mail, and ballot harvesting (where legal) tactics that the Democrats use.

I imagine it depends on which bank is backing the card. You should be able to use a regular card (Visa, MC, Discover, etc.). Good Luck!

In general, the K1 medical exam should suffice for the AOS. The issues tend to be related to vaccinations not being complete, etc. which could lead to an RFE at some point. Submit the 3025 with your package, and you should be fine. Good Luck!

But the I751 is still within normal processing times, so could a WoM drive a decision there? To my knowledge there is nothing that drives USCIS to adjudicate the I751 just because an N400 was submitted. Now for most, the cases are combined and decided at the same time, but there is no requirement that this happen unless someone has more information.

But as soon as Tehran launched this attack they said through the UN everything is concluded. I wonder if Israel agrees. https://www.foxnews.com/world/iran-offers-israel-off-ramp-conclude-attack-launching-missiles-drones-jewish-state

I do wonder what Hezbolla and the Houthis will do.

Probably not very long, but there are quite a few options out there for Left biased journalists that have opened their eyes.

Yes, the CG, regardless if it is conditional supersedes the AP/EAD. She is now an LP and can travel outside the U.S.

Congratulations on navigating a difficult journey, and thanks for providing an update. Enjoy West Michigan!

Could go either here or in the immigration master thread, but this one was handy. I guess fewer police to enforce the laws is logical. Denver defunds police to pay for migrant crisis: Democrat city strips cops' budget of $8.4million in sweeping cuts https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13302377/denver-defunds-police-pay-migrant-crisis.html

You can try the CIS Ombudsman, but if both cases are within normal processing times, they also may not be much help. Good Luck!

Not necessary since you have the physical SSC with the note and a GC, you should be fine. Good Luck!

Too realistic for the Bee.

Here is the most recent thread I could find. Good Luck!

If the moderators wish to move this to CEHST, I am fine with that. Robbery, fatal shooting revealed as elaborate visa fraud scheme Police believe the motive was to leverage their status as crime victims to apply for a U nonimmigrant visa, known as a “U visa.” Investigations revealed that the robbery was part of a larger scheme involving insurance and immigration fraud. The charging documents indicate that not only was the robbery staged, but several other similar incidents occurred across the area, implicating multiple individuals, including store clerks. https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2024/04/06/robbery-fatal-shooting-revealed-as-elaborate-visa-fraud-scheme/

Breaking now. Prayers for those involved. Second link has the video. Maryland: Ship hits Francis Scott Key Bridge causing it to collapse https://www.foxnews.com/us/maryland-ship-hits-francis-scott-key-bridge-causing-collapse https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13239111/Maryland-Key-Bridge-collapses-struck-large-container-ship.html

Maybe Mann, and Fauci can be held together. This guy is amazing, and someone needs to find out who is paying his bills. Climate scientist Michael Mann’s defamation case reveals what critics say is unethical behavior Mann is suing Simberg over statements he and Steyn made in articles they posted online. Testimony so far has raised a number of complaints about plaintiff Mann’s behavior toward his critics. One witnesses’ deposition even revealed that Mann had emailed the editor of a scientific journal in 2007 to stop a paper written by another climate scientist from being published by getting hostile peer reviewers assigned to it. Journalists Phelim McAleer and Ann McElhinney have been at the trial and posting regular podcasts on what's happening in court. The podcast, which has ranked in the top 15 podcasts on Spotify in the science category, highlights testimony in the trial using actors to portray what was said in court. According to a summary of the case that Superior Court of the District of Columbia Judge Alfred Irving gave during the trial, Simberg’s and Steyn’s post compared the Penn State’s investigation into assistant coach Jerry Sandusky, who was found guilty in 2012 of sexually abusing 10 young boys over the course of 15 years, to the investigation of Mann’s research on global historic temperatures as shown in the scientist's controversial hockey stick graph. https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/climate-scientists-defamation-case-reveals-what-critics-say-plaintiffs