Dashinka

Nope, we are saying the same thing. You may want to ask the lawyer what the estimated timelines are for all of them? This is what we are saying is different between the different classes of visas they will eventually apply for. I assume USC since an LPR cannot petition for parents.

Does your company employ the services of a travel agency? In my case, if I need to travel overseas for business where a visa is required we have a travel agency that handles everything. They will have the list of required documents necessary, but they probably will not help if this is purely a personal B2 application.

No difference. From an immigration perspective, parents are considered immediate relatives, siblings (half or full) are family preference (note, I understand that you think of your half-brother as an immediate relative, but US immigration does not). In your case filing the I130 for your parents (IR5 visa) will follow one timeline (approximately 1-2 years) and your half-brother (F4 visa) will follow a completely separate timeline (15+ years depending on the country). There is no numerical limitation on visas for immediate relatives, but there are for family preference so they take longer due to a huge backlog of petitions. I included the link for the visa bulletin so you can see the amount of time it takes for an F4 visa. As others have stated, you can file the I130's for all your relatives, and your parents will get their visa's first, then when they come to the US and become LPRs, they can also file their own I130 for your half-brother under the F2A or F2B category depending on his age when the I130 they file is approved. Another idea is to file for one of your parents, and then they come and file the I130's for their spouse and their child. Good Luck! https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Bulletins/visabulletin_January2024.pdf

So you have legal residency in Morocco? If so, follow what @Crazy Cat stated, contact the consulate where it is at, and update them of your current residency.

Sounds good. I edited my response after your response. I would go through your company if there is a business reason for you to travel, if not, there is not much else you can do until you get your Canadian citizenship or the consulate finalizes this application. Good Luck!

Will they issue a visa in a passport that has less than six month validity? Additionally, if your company is as you say, don't they have a service to do visas? I know when I need a visa for work travel, I can use the company service, and they take care of everything. Now they cannot expedite anything, but they are usually pretty good at laying out the exact business purpose for the B1, and showing the need for you to not overstay.

Thought this was interesting in that it showed that interest on the national debt is in 4th place on the federal spending table just 2% less than Defense spending. With the exponentially expanding national debt, I suspect that may change quite quickly. The future of Bidenomics: You pay Social Security tax on all of your income? On the opposite side of the ledger, we run an annual fiscal deficit of roughly $1.8 trillion and here are the top four expenses. Medicare/Medicaid (24% of spending) Social Security (22% of spending) Defense (13% of spending) Net Interest on the Debt (11% of spending) https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/future-bidenomics-you-pay-social-security-tax-all-your-income

If you do not abuse your B2, you can still visit. As to your number 2, unless you are currently in the US, consular processing is your only option. Good Luck!

Thinking about this further, as long as she has the proper documents to enter Tajikistan she should be fine with the US consulate there. Good Luck!

Seems like a fairly comprehensive list. Good Luck!

Correct I believe the I130 will result in an IR2 visa for your step-son. Not entirely certain, but I believe children over the age of 14 are required to attend an interview. This is more of a legal custody question. I would defer to your lawyer handling custody documents, and if they believe everything is in order, he should be fine. Good Luck! https://www.uscis.gov/adoption/immigration-through-adoption/family-based-petition-process/immigration-adoption-and-citizenship-for-stepchildren-of-us-citizens-and-lprs

Honestly, I could not care less about Hillary Clinton, but I do love that the favored fact-checker of FB/Meta felt the need to fact check this. Video is evidence that Hillary Clinton is a reptile. This is not the first time such a claim has surfaced. In 2009, Richard Heene, who fabricated a story that his son had floated away in a UFO-shaped balloon, also made false statements about Clinton being reptilian. Claims that high-profile people are reptilian are unfounded and part of a long-running conspiracy theory. PolitiFact has debunked similar claims about President Joe Biden, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla and Queen Elizabeth II after her death in 2022. We rate the claim that video is evidence that Clinton is a reptile Pants on Fire! https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/dec/21/instagram-posts/this-video-does-not-prove-that-hillary-clinton-is/

Have her show the GC, but keep the NOA from the I131 in case CBP asks her anything. A lot of GC holders apply for a re-entry permit and their plan change and they come back to the US prior to the REP being approved. She should have no issues. Good Luck!

I am going to report this thread and ask a moderator to move it to the Russia/Ukraine/Belarus regional forum as you may get more answers there. As to the point, I think she should be fine, but I am not certain. Good Luck!

This is probably why the consulate and CBP has the note about having a child after the visa is issued but before immigrating to the US. Essentially, this should be a reason for DCF if the child does not qualify for CRBA as in this case, but they are saying no visa is needed when this happens if the newborn is traveling with the parent that has a valid visa, and the birth certificate verifies the parenthood, so no I130 is needed, and no special circumstance required.

I agree now with @carmel34 and @Boiler, if this petition was denied due to an AWA issue, a lawyer is needed for the spousal visa.

If you are worried about being allowed on a flight with the baby via the Consulate information you can refer the airline to the CBP Carrier Guide Page 10 (see below). Another option is to fly to Canada and drive across the border. Good Luck! Child born abroad to an accompanying parent after issuance of an immigrant visa to the parent but before the parent’s initial admission as an immigrant may be boarded as long as the child has a passport and birth certificate. https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/assets/documents/2023-Nov/Carrier Information Guide ENGLISH.pdf

This entire episode was just a testament to how the Left Identity Politics and DEI stuff works. Harvard tried so hard to re-define Gay's stealing of other's work to get where she was at. Then of course we get the racism angle, when if you really look at it, it was Gay, and Harvard that was being racist. If I were a Harvard student, or alum, I would be disgusted.

Not really sure anyone can answer this. The CO may ask why you requested the case be transferred, but then again, they may not. Good Luck!

I agree, this cannot really be answered without a few more details as to why the I-129F petition was denied.

Then I would pursue the information you provided. I assume you have a US passport, so you will not be getting a visa, and the child, if born after your husband's spousal visa is issued, appears to not need a new petition provided you have the long-form birth certificate. The key is in bold. If the child is born before your husband gets his visa, then you need a new I130 is how I interpret this. Good Luck! 12) I've had a child after receiving my visa. Does my child need a visa? If your child was born after your visa was issued but before you move to the United States, you should first check if your child may have a claim to citizenship as the child of a U.S. citizen. If not, then your child may travel with you when you move to the United States using your visa, provided that you show the child’s long-form birth certificate which states the names of both parents. If you are a Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR) and you have had a child overseas during a temporary absence from the United States, click here for the information you need. https://uk.usembassy.gov/visas/immigrant-visas/after-your-immigrant-or-fiancee-visa-has-been-issued/?_ga=2.108036226.1045392846.1704281189-214534049.1704281189

Are you able to pass on US citizenship to you upcoming child? If so, CRBA. Good Luck! https://uk.usembassy.gov/u-s-citizen-services/citizenship/consular-report-of-birth-abroad-crba-and-first-u-s-passport/

Suicides scheduled? Prince Andrew sex accuser Virginia Giuffre taunts 'there's going to be a lot of nervous people...who's on the naughty list?' after judge rules 170 people linked to Jeffrey Epstein can be named in court Prince Andrew's accuser Virginia Giuffre has welcomed a judge's ruling that 170 people linked to Jeffrey Epstein are set to be unmasked, as she taunted his associates by asking 'who's on the naughty list?' It comes after DailyMail.com revealed that dozens of Epstein's high profile associates can be named in court documents set to be released in the first days of 2024. Giuffre, nee Roberts, who claims she was trafficked by Epstein and had sex with Prince Andrew aged 17, was triumphant in her bid to get a dossier containing the names of the disgraced financier's associates and victims unsealed. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12886017/Prince-Andrew-sex-accuser-Virginia-Giuffre-nervous-people-naughty-list-judge-rules-170-people-linked-Jeffrey-Epstein-named.html

So to me this is much more general than just the Hamas terror attacks into Israel (if mods feel otherwise, feel free to put this in the Israel thread). It is certainly true, people usually show their true colors. A great example is the racist attitudes of Old Corrupt Joe which shine through all the time. When People Tell You Who They Are, Believe Them On the one hand I think: surely this will be sufficient. Surely this amount of blood will be enough to shake the world awake. Surely no one can equivocate or justify this. As my friend Sarah Haider wrote, “How easy is it to simply condemn targeted violence against civilians? Can there be a lower bar?” And yet, across the world, people have sunk below it. Here you can watch people gathered at the Sydney Opera House cheering “gas the Jews” and “death to the Jews.” People are rejoicing in the slaughter on the streets of Berlin and London and Toronto and New York. (Scroll down to read our Free Press dispatch on the celebrations in Manhattan.) https://www.thefp.com/p/when-people-tell-you-who-they-are

What I do not understand is the three Leftist justices voted in favor of religious rights on the postal worker case released yesterday, but voted against this one released today. Supreme Court rules in favor of Colorado graphic designer who refused to create same-sex wedding websites The U.S. Supreme Court held that a Colorado graphic designer who wants to make wedding websites does not have to create them for same-sex marriages, in a landmark decision that pit the interests of LGBTQ non-discrimination against First Amendment freedom. In a 6-3 decision issued Friday, the high court ruled in favor of artist Lorie Smith, who sued the state over its anti-discrimination law that prohibited businesses providing sales or other accommodations to the public from denying service based on a customer's sexual orientation. Justice Neil Gorsuch authored the majority opinion, which said that, "In this case, Colorado seeks to force an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance." https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-colorado-graphic-designer-who-refused-to-create-same-sex-wedding-websites/ar-AA1dg4M7