Dashinka

Ha ha, I first read it as “desert”, and immediately thought Cosmo Kramer was back designing fragrances. Glad you had a nice Christmas!

Not sure anyone is paying attention, but Germany is having a bit of a difficult time economically. Germany uses the weapon of climate change against its own people The drama kicked off when Germany’s coalition government led by Chancellor Olaf Scholz found itself in a bit of a bind recently. Team Scholz had quietly moved €60 billion from a Covid-19 pandemic support fund into a green energy transition fund. The opposition noticed and finked to the court – which told Team Scholz to put the cash back because the sneaky move was a blatant violation of a law that had been ushered in under former Chancellor Angela Merkel specifically in an effort to ensure that the government was never able to bury itself in debt. Whoops, too late. Subsequently finding themselves underwater on the overall annual budget by an estimated €17 billion, they set about looking for ways to plug the hole. Farmers, Team Scholz apparently figured, can at least be bilked for cash on the pretext that the government tax subsidies for the sinful diesel fuel that powers their equipment deserve to be canceled – sacrificed on the altar of climate change. It all sounds so virtuous, and not at all like scrambling to compensate for a major screwup. https://www.rt.com/news/589653-germany-berlin-climate-farmers/

Muslim ban? Seems TDS is strong in you.

Glock 17 from my wife, a nice coat, and some ear protections, case, and cleaning kit for the aforementioned Glock. I got my wife a Roomba, some nice socks, gloves, and her favorite fragrance and skin care products. Merry Christmas!

Hoping everyone has a nice wonderful Christmas!

What step in the process are you in? The title indicates AOS, but you mentioned sending the I129F in the OP?

Hard to say since this was an F4. I130’s at NVC can be kept open indefinitely as long as they are touched once a year at NVC, but I am not sure of those that are collecting dust at USCIS.

Might be a case for an immigration attorney. “Undocumented” usually means the person entered the U.S. without inspection which can further complicate any cases.

To the best of my knowledge you can ignore the I751 reminder letter, and just keep getting ADIT stamps until USCIS works out the I90. Your wife deserves a 10 yr GC based on your story. If for some reason the I90 is denied, I am not sure if that is something that can be appealed. Good Luck!

As @Lil bear stated, it is possible they would reuse biometrics from your wife’s and step-daughter’s AOS for the ROC and/or the REP, but it is not guaranteed. The point is they will need to remain in the U.S. after submitting the I131 until the biometrics for that application is fulfilled. Hopefully that will just be 2-4 weeks after submitting the I131, and if they are called for biometrics for both, they can take both notices to the office and hopefully USCIS will do them both at the same time. Good Luck!

I truly wish there was accountability for the elite in DC, and the elite in general.

Yes, this is what I thought as I have been through those internal checkpoints. The I94 from the K1 entry shows she is authorized to stay in the US for 90 days. This should suffice for any internal CBP checkpoints assuming you are inside that 90 day window.

Print out the I94 from her K1 entry.

I tend to agree, it is required to file the I131 re-entry permit application from within the U.S., and also fulfill the biometrics (if required) before actually leaving. To @Vabsmith, a slight amendment to my suggestion, get the I751 in process when their window opens, and then get the I131 filled out. Then come back to the U.S. for I751 biometrics and submit the I131 immediately upon return. Hopefully, the NOA for the I131 will show up very soon after.

You are right, I meant to say DS260, and yes, if her residency changed since the DS260 was filled out, she should disclose it.

Welcome! Immigration can indeed be daunting, and many folks use a lawyer or a service to assist. Regardless of if you do it yourself, or use a lawyer or service, the petitioner (you), and the beneficiary (your fiancé) needs to be well educated in the process as lawyers and services require you both to provide the material and evidence needed for the petition and eventual visa application. It is also a good idea for the couple to scrutinize any form or submission that will be submitted in their name. In the end, it is the couple’s choice on how to proceed. @TBoneTX already provided a good comparison between the K1 and spousal visa (CR1/IR1), so I will not repeat that. You need to decide what is most important and see which one fits you best. Good Luck!

To my knowledge this will not impact the interview location unless you actually requested the change of consulates. She will have to disclose the additional residency when she fills out the DS160 or at the interview and if she is there for more than six months, I believe she will need a police report from that third country. Good Luck!

The consulate where your case is headed.

Is that child counted as a dependent by the co-sponsor?

The big question that will need to be answered is what constitutes an insurrection. Does someone need to be charged with and convicted of it to trigger the clause in the 14th. I do wonder what SCOTUS will do. Can they simply punt and leave the CO SC stay in place?

To be fair, Barack Obama also called himself a constitutional scholar, and he enacted DACA and DAPA.

The truth usually works. School, family, etc. based on your posts. There have been recent stories of LPRs outside the US for several years that have had no issues. Also, depending on her final destination, the US Canada land crossings seem to be easier, but that is purely anecdotal.

If the time to get a passport renewal in Canada is fairly quick, why not do it now.

So a gun control group does not feel it needs to bey the gun control laws? San Juan sheriff initiates investigation into New Mexicans to Prevent Gun Violence buybacks in Farmington Dec. 18—The San Juan County Sheriff's Office is investigating whether a Santa Fe-based gun violence prevention organization violated a state law on firearms transactions — raising questions about the legality of the group's gun buyback program that for years has received accolades. New Mexicans to Prevent Gun Violence had championed a bill creating the law, which requires background checks for most private firearms transactions. "I don't have anything against the New Mexicans [to Prevent] Gun Violence folks," San Juan County Sheriff Shane Ferrari said Monday. "I just need to make sure they're operating lawfully like everyone else," added the sheriff, who said he personally doesn't believe gun buybacks curb crime. https://www.aol.com/san-juan-sheriff-initiates-investigation-043300056.html

Prior damage with 115 miles?