Dashinka

Moved to the Philippines Regional Forum for more specific responses.

Does this sound familiar? How many folks have passed through VJ where they claimed to be married on a B2 application and then were now going through a spousal visa application and wanted to know how to overcome a previous marriage (fake, real or otherwise)? In one incident, investigators encountered a Kenyan immigrant who paid just $100 for a fake death certificate in his wife’s name so he could marry his way into the US. The trouble is, his wife was alive and well, and found with their five kids in Minneapolis.

I can think of worse descriptors.

Not sure about an automatic denial of a B2 application with a CMT record, but that would seem to make sense. Hopefully you documented what you showed that officer. I think you will certainly have some hurdles with respect to a future IV application. I would definitely consult with a good attorney before proceeding. Good Luck!

Thanks for the education. I was not allowed to stay in the room when my wife had her N400 interview after our I751 interview, so maybe she had the same thing.

Sort of agreeing to the Terms of Services?

I doubt what they had you sign was the oath of allegiance, but rather an oath to tell the truth during the interview. Beyond that, be patient, a decision should come soon. Good Luck!

I agree, she can always give adequate notice once the visa is in hand. Good Luck!

MD-11's are old planes. Prayers to those this affected including the flight crew.

Personally, I would put your future address for the mailing address as well as Physical address 1. Since you are filing this on paper, you can put a future date for Physical Address 1, then put your Italy address in the 2nd section. Good Luck!

It is not clear, are you suggesting performing a wedding ceremony before she enters the US via the Utah Zoom route, or immediately after she enters?

Ok, I really feel for that groom, but I guess he made his choice. I do wonder what will happen to the psychic/life coach if the marriage fails.

Which was a response to another comment inferring a President was usurping Congressional authority. This of course is not true as the action appears to be within the law as currently written. Congress of course can write new law, but we all know that will never happen. Like @S2N, I am not in complete agreement of this change in policy, but it was probably necessary to take care of all the EADs that were handed out like Pez by the previous administration.

He is or was part of a very exclusive club. He shot someone, and that someone apologized for getting in the way. RIP #######

I agree, if naturalization is a goal, no reason to wait. I also agree that making an inquiry is not a concern. You may also contact your US House member or Senator. Good Luck!

Interview waivers used to be quite common back about 10 years ago or so, not so much anymore. Good Luck!

Some USCIS field offices have less workload, so yes, perfectly normal. Good Luck!

To add to what @OldUser replied, biometrics will need to be satisfied for a REP/I131 (reused or new), and you should not leave the U.S. until that is completed. You can have the permit forwarded to the consulate where you will be. Good Luck!

I agree with everyone else here. File ASAP, you can gather more evidence while the petition is processing and take it to the interview. Good Luck!

Since you are filing as a spouse that entered on a K1 visa (per profile), you do not have a Priority Date or an Underlying petition. Good Luck!

Is he (Trump) going outside the law as written today? Did the law state these EAD renewals must be approved without scrutiny? While I agree this will slow things down, I don’t see it as Trump or USCIS creating new law unless you can show otherwise.

Congratulations!

I am going to post this here. While this cannot be blamed entirely on Newsom, with the one party rule in CA, we can blame it on that party of which he is the head of in the state. Do we want him as a President in the future. CA state retirement fund lost 71% of $468M put in clean energy, won’t say how (The Center Square) – The California Public Employees' Retirement System for state employees lost 71% of its $468 million investment in a clean energy and technology private equity fund, state records show, but CalPERS won’t explain how. These losses are a major problem for California taxpayers, who at least for now are the backstop for underfunded state pensions, but also for state employees who trust CalPERS to responsibly manage their retirement plans. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/ca-state-retirement-fund-lost-71-of-468m-put-in-clean-energy-won-t-say-how/ar-AA1Plw5N?ocid=BingNewsSerp

Congratulations!

Congrats! Btw, you said Troy, MI, did USCIS open up another office in Michigan?