Dashinka

Interesting. I guess Andrew was not the only high level UK person chumming up to Epstein. I guess King Charles was right to cut him loose after the Queen assumed room temperature. Btw, how much more embarrassing can it be than to be pictured with only your Fruit of the Looms on. Lord Mandelson resigns from Labour Party after claims he received $75,000 from Jeffrey Epstein: Peer pictured in his pants says he wants to avoid 'further embarrassment' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15518347/Peter-Mandelson-RESIGNS-Labour-Party-latest-Epstein-file-release.html

Yep, it was ICE going around smashing windows. That is a great and logical conclusion. Sure, it might not be the extremist leftist rioters, maybe it is others taking advantage of the chaos being created by those rioters. It is nice to know that you are now referring to them as rioters.

No respect for personal property. How can these folks not be described as radical extreme leftists?

One only hopes this leads to more sane minds, but I doubt it. The money involved in the mutilation of minors is probably too much of a siren song to many.

Except when one can play the R Card.

Isn’t this fairly obvious? I guess it is either unintended consequences or “progress”.

Hmm, privileged? GREGG JARRETT: Don Lemon left his press pass at the door when he joined church-storming mob It is a popular fallacy that freedom of the press enshrined in the First Amendment is absolute. It is not and never has been. The recent arrest of podcaster Don Lemon on federal criminal charges that he willingly joined a mob of anti-ICE protesters who stormed a St. Paul, Minnesota church during Sunday services will inevitably test well-established limits on press freedoms. Journalists, however defined, cannot, without legal consequences engage in incitement, defamation, obscenity, threatened violence, national security breaches, and the commission of crimes. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/gregg-jarrett-don-lemon-left-his-press-pass-door-when-he-joined-church-storming-mob

Not going back to find a 5.5 year old thread. I remember (or at least seem to remember) saying the whole Chaz/Chop thing would cost Seattle some money. I only wish the elected politicians that enable this stuff would also be held liable. I don't remember a big protest when the Chaz/Chop "security/ICE" teams shot this kid, but whatever. Jury finds city of Seattle liable for teen’s death in CHOP zone; awards family $30 million A jury has awarded the father of a teen who was shot and killed in the Capitol Hill Occupied Protest (CHOP) zone in Seattle in 2020 approximately $30-million after finding the city was negligent in how it handled the weeks-long protest zone. The family of Antonio Mays Jr., 16, filed a lawsuit alleging his death was the result of unsafe conditions in the CHOP Zone, which the city of Seattle had known about for weeks by the time he was killed in late June of 2020. The lawsuit alleged Mays had been ‘lured’ into the CHOP zone by a statement from city officials who supported the CHOP zone during the Black Lives Matter movement in 2020. According to the lawsuit, Mays and his friend Robert West were driving around Cal Anderson Park in a Jeep when they were shot by civilian guards who were acting as CHOP security. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/jury-finds-city-of-seattle-liable-for-teen-s-death-in-chop-zone-awards-family-30-million/ar-AA1VhBQH

So this guy has a civil case against the government. Like you said earlier, that is what courts are for.

Except the chimps will survive since they have not progressed beyond poo flinging...

That is what I would do, or you can wait until you file your 2025 taxes and then leave out the the 2022 information. Btw, if memory serves, you only actually have to provide the most recent tax filings as evidence for the I864 (you report income for the last three years on the form), so it really doesn't matter except for providing the most recent information when you can. Good Luck!

I agree, I would upload it as well as take copies to the interview. Good Luck!

I don’t think it matters just to get access to the AR-11 form online since you have to enter your A number in the form along with your other information. Good Luck!

So a tow truck operator is illegally running plates?

It is amazing how often politicians forget the internet has existed for some time. 2010 Obama clip goes viral where he defends deportations, even of those ‘just trying to earn a living’ https://www.foxnews.com/media/2010-obama-clip-goes-viral-where-he-defends-deportations-even-those-just-trying-earn-living

Also, your husband as the USC and signatory on the I864 should file an I865 change of address.

Has all that been confirmed (no warrant, no apology, not covering damages), or is it just off the cuff political conclusions?

Sorry this did not work out for you. It is tough going through all the hurdles required for immigration and then end up with a broken relationship. Good luck with your future.

Then explain to me why Jacob Frey is throwing around the “unconstitutional” qualifier? Are you saying the apprehensions based on INA laws are in fact unconstitutional? This is what Frey was talking about.

Each locale follows their own calendars and that may be exacerbated by the calendar of the local federal court if they do judicial oaths. One thing that can delay an oath ceremony is if a name change is associated with the N400 application, but other than that, maybe they are still catching up from the late year holidays. Good Luck!

I agree, this is more of a divorce situation, so if you are certain in that path, get a good divorce attorney and move on with that process. As @Crazy Cat mentioned, you are still obligated per the I864, and will need to file an I865 for any address changes, but beyond that, any further immigration proceedings (ROC, N400) will be his if he chooses to or wants to stay in the US. If you have hard evidence of potential immigration fraud, you can report that to ICE at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov Good Luck!

Then what is unconstitutional about apprehending an illegal immigrant that has a final order of deportation? Frey is the one that said this although I don’t believe he is a constitutional scholar, but if he is insinuating that enforcing INA laws is unconstitutional then he needs to pursue legal means to fight that rather than to egg on the unhinged leftist radicals. Btw, did he hold these same views when the reporter-in-chief (Obama) was in the WH?

Moved to the US Citizenship Case Filing and Progress Reports Forum As to your questions, your stepchild will automatically become a citizen when your wife becomes one assuming he is under the age of 18. No need to file a separate N400 for him, he can obtain a U.S. Passport using your wife’s naturalization certificate. You should consider filing the N600 for him after he becomes a USC so he can obtain his own certificate of citizenship, but that does not need to be done immediately. I am not sure about name changes in the case of derived USC through your wife. You may be able to do that via the N600 filing, but I am uncertain of that. As to last name changes, I think you would need a legal adoption for that. You can look into getting an expedited passport for both through a U.S. passport agency in Washington DC immediately after the oath ceremony. Research this and you may be able to schedule an appointment accordingly. I believe you can get a same day passport if you have immediate travel plans. Good Luck! https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/passports/get-fast/passport-agencies/washington.html

Heard about this, some Democrats operative realtor I heard. I can’t post the items from X due to the ToS.