Dashinka

Hmm, that last one sums up the last three Democrat candidates. I know, Hillary is very smart, but exceedingly stupid in thinking people would vote for her.

Not my go to, but it is not bad. Love the pizza doomsday clock better than the one from the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Hmm, seems like a propaganda effort. China Is Often Lauded for Its Devotion to Clean Energy. BTW, It Also Oppresses Freedom. https://www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2026/02/20/china_is_often_lauded_for_its_devotion_to_clean_energy_btw_it_also_oppresses_freedom_1165659.html

I agree with @Fr8dog, but it might be a good idea to have her get an ADIT/I551 stamp regardless as the I751 process can take some time. Good Luck!

Wasn't it Obama that broke the rule of the President publicly criticizing the Supreme Court? I also remember him opining about how restrictive the US Constitution is to him and the federal government. Hmm, sounds like something a king would do. Btw, you really cannot determine the bias of a judge just by who nominated them. Often presidents throw a bone to Senators of the other party in a state when nominating a federal judge. You still haven't shown how ICE tactics and procedures have changed? No, this is all about political theatre as we saw in the "Summer of Love" of 2020 where the left/Democrats showed their true colors when it comes to law enforcement. The Democrats saw how much that worked, and so it is wash rinse and repeat with their extremist base.

Newsom showing his true colors, or just totally brain dead?

I agree with @Vickys_Mom and @Crazy Cat, and add my vote for applying under the "General Provision". Good Luck!

I expect so as long as he meets the requirements to derive citizenship when your wife naturalizes. I would research the links below. Good Luck! Note: Children of U.S. citizen military members residing outside the United States may complete the entire process from abroad. For more information, see our Military Citizenship for Family Members page. https://www.uscis.gov/citizenship/learn-about-citizenship/i-am-the-child-of-a-us-citizen https://www.uscis.gov/military/citizenship-for-military-family-members

BBC of course got the headline wrong as the "far-left" are now the mainstream in Western society. I thought the left were tolerant. Student death puts French far-left under pressure France's radical left is under pressure after the killing of a student in Lyon was blamed on "anti-fascist" militants. Quentin Deranque, a 23-year-old maths student and nationalist activist, died on Saturday, two days after being beaten up on the street by a group of young men. State prosecutor Thierry Dran told a news conference on Monday afternoon in Lyon that a murder investigation has been opened into the death. He said that Deranque was kicked and punched by "at least six" individuals, and that the autopsy showed fatal damage to his skull and brain. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3630g3e802o

Let's abolish ICE...you know, for the children. Connecticut sanctuary policies under fire after release of accused child predator https://www.shorenewsnetwork.com/connecticut-sanctuary-policies-under-fire-after-release-of-accused-child-predator/

Those types of questions don’t make the MSM.

Btw, is this judge saying having a final order of deportation issued by an IJ is unconstitutional? I guess all immigration decisions need to be made in Federal Court now. If we thought legal immigration was slow before, just wait. It is interesting that ICE is doing things to actually protect people in this country from the likes of the person mentioned above, and the extremist left/Democrats instead prefer releasing those people into the community. Which party is for crime and chaos?

Call me surprised. I have never been a big fan of her's, especially with her over promising and under delivering on quite a few things. Regardless, she is a lot better than Merrick (thank God McConnell kept him off SCOTUS( Garland.

Actually, I am referring to the requirement to be “living in a marital union” for three years prior to filing (not at the time of the interview or oath). This requirement can trip up those filing under the 3 yr rule if they entered on a spousal visa as living apart even if legally married may not satisfy the marital union requirement, so essentially the marital union begins when the immigrant enters the U.S. on their spousal visa and re-unites with their spouse. Therefore the 90 day early filing may result in a petition being rejected for only being in a marital union for two years and nine months or so at the time of filing. I recommend if you entered and gained your LPR status via a spousal visa is to wait and file the N400 after you meet the three years of being an LPR and maybe add a few days just to be safe (see cautionary thread attached), and don’t file during the 90 day early filing period. This does not usually hit the K1/AOS folks as the period of processing the AOS generally takes up the 90 days (not many AOSs being processed in less than 90 days). I hope this makes sense. Good Luck!

So the Democrats/Left really don't care about children?

Just curious as to which path you took for a GC? If through a K1/I485 you are fine with filing in the 90 day early filing period, if through a spousal visa, you should wait to file until after you have actually passed you 3rd year anniversary of getting your GC. Good Luck!

Completely up to you since I assume you are still here legally on your student visa. It may or may not result in movement on the I130 as there are many factors in that. Good Luck!

This is beyond the pale. As a former firefighter, this really steams me when some sets a building on fire, and the fact that this wasn’t even her building and was was done with less than stellar information makes it even worse, but like most on the Left with little compassion for others, it doesn’t appear this whack job woman cares one bit.

I meant to say grammatical miscues. I realize this may lose him his elite (name a flower) status, but maybe he will learn.

Grammatical miscues aside, you are somewhat right in that an elected sheriff does not answer to the executive of the county where they serve, but the sheriff's office does function as part of the executive branch where they are generally in charge of law enforcement and running local jails for their jurisdiction. They are not part of the judicial branch, and they are not part of the legislative branch within their entity

There are those pesky SSRI's again.

When a district judge puts in place a ruling based on their own political biases for the entire country, that sounds a lot like what a king may do. And yes, judges do have political biases, and are not always able to separate those from their rulings.

I thought Democrats vow to protect children?

Seems most appropriate here. Puyallup teen wrestler claims school ignored her claim of sex assault by male opponent (The Center Square) - The office of Pierce County Sheriff Keith Swank and the Puyallup School District confirm they are conducting an investigation into an alleged sexual assault against a Puyallup high school wrestler. The Rogers High School sophomore reported the alleged assault to school officials and her coach two days later, but the family contends administration failed to take meaningful action to protect and investigate her claim of sexual assault. The alleged victim, 16-year-old Kallie Keeler says the incident happened during a Dec 6, 2025, match in which she was wrestling against a 190-pound male wrestler. She did not know he was a biological male at the time. https://www.thecentersquare.com/washington/article_125149f7-8481-4402-9dab-ae8514b768e5.html

Doesn't this depend on if a higher court put a stay on the lower court rulings? It is amazing how many judges believe they are a king or queen. As to clock hands what is that all about? The doomsday clock? If so, you do know that is a complete joke.