Jump to content

Dashinka

Members
  • Posts

    33,736
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    66

Dashinka last won the day on December 24 2024

Dashinka had the most liked content!

10 Followers

About Dashinka

  • Birthday 05/28/1967

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • City
    Who knows
  • State
    Michigan

Immigration Info

  • Immigration Status
    Naturalization (approved)
  • Place benefits filed at
    Chicago Lockbox
  • Local Office
    Detroit MI
  • Country
    Russia

Immigration Timeline & Photos

Dashinka's Achievements

Recent Profile Visitors

40,773 profile views
  1. Leave it to Democrats to pass irreconcilable laws based on hopes and dreams. Is anyone really surprised this happens in NY? Amicus Brief Filed In Glen Oaks Village Owners v. City Of New York Meanwhile, New York State’s Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act of 2019 (Climate Act) remains on the books. That statute commands the complete restructuring of New York’s energy economy to reach “net zero” greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, with a most immediate first deadline of 70% of electricity generation from “renewables” by 2030. They never had a credible plan to achieve that, but they pretended they were going to do most of it with the big offshore wind buildout. Now that that is dead, they don’t even have a fake plan. And also meanwhile, New York City’s statute known as Local Law 97 also remains on the books. That’s the statute that mandates that all residential buildings in excess of 25,000 square feet convert to electric heat by 2030 — the same year that the State’s Climate Act mandates 70% of electricity generation from “renewables,” of which the large majority can only come from non-existent wind and solar. Thus we have the City mandating a huge increase in electricity demand by 2030 at the same time that the State is mandating dismantling our existing reliable electricity generation with no credible plan to replace it. https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2025-2-23-amicus-brief-filed-in-glen-oaks-village-owners-v-city-of-new-york
  2. This could be an interesting change to the EB5.
  3. I have seen this create confusion within USCIS. If submitting an IRS transcript, there is no need to include any W2's/1099's as that information is included in the transcript, but since he included a copy of his W2 in the RFE response, USCIS appears to be looking for a copy of the return (1040, 1040A, or 1040EZ) that was submitted to the IRS which is not the same as the transcript from the IRS. I know, it doesn't make any sense, but that can come from a bureaucracy. I agree with @Demise, file the I290B with the copy of the 1040 form submitted, or start the I485 all over again (I would do the I290B it it were me). As to the denial, it is more about not responding to an RFE properly at least according to USCIS. Generally speaking, if an RFE is issued, that is the petitioner's/beneficiary's chance to correct a mistake in a petition, if that is not correctly done, the case is denied, and USCIS moves on. Good Luck!
  4. Are you applying for a US immigration benefit.
  5. Applying under the 5yr rule generally requires less marital evidence. Since you are 5 yrs an LPR, I would check the "General Provision" box. Good Luck!
  6. That is definitely true, plus you don't have to deal with the semis coming in and going out.
  7. I remember when ESPN was just starting out, the used to show Australian Rules Football games overnight. That was definitely a rugged sport, sort of a mix between rugby, soccer, and American style football complete with a goal judge dressed in a white coat.
  8. Very common to see the CEAC status change like that. Good Luck!
  9. German (the language) is so great, always a word for everything. Plus it is a great word to say dunkelflaute! Inside Dunkelflaute, Europe's Renewable Energy Challenge So the phenomena of Dunkelflaute, characterised by periods when there is minimal or no wind and solar power generation, poses significant challenges to Europe's energy landscape. https://sustainabilitymag.com/articles/the-gas-demand-rollercoaster-what-is-dunkelflaute
  10. It seems your nephew needs to file an I290B. If the RFE was answered properly and within the time period, the I485 should be re-opened. Good Luck!
  11. Her kids are learning, “You should have just stolen some. It sounds really easy.”
  12. Was this an immediate denial after filing, or was this some time after? Again, if you have items requested in the bulleted items, you can try the I290B route to keep the EAD active. Don't worry about the boilerplate language right now, just worry about making your choice of routes and do that as quickly as possible. Good Luck!
  13. We need a little more detail regarding the reason for the denial. Did you receive an RFE that was not responded to? Was there an interview where information was requested? If the I485 was denied and you received a notice of the denial, then yes, your only options are to either file an I290B or start again with a new I485 package correcting the reason for the denial. I would look at both options and especially the I290B as that should keep the EAD active, but a new I485 filing would mean needing to file a new I765 for employment authorization. Good Luck!
  14. I was think private school with lodgings as well.
×
×
  • Create New...