Jump to content

pushbrk

Members
  • Posts

    40,068
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    47

Everything posted by pushbrk

  1. You could write to USCIS or just deal with it when the case gets to NVC. If you are a legal resident of a country other than your country of Citizenship, you can interview there by doing a consulate change, also at NVC.
  2. Not necessarily. You can explain just as you did above by hand writing on the form, "From date through date, there were over 500 crossings to El Paso only.
  3. Please study it all and interpret what you read LITERALLY. Then ask questions. Understand the guide too, so you know what's important now and what comes later.
  4. Yes, I understood, and gave you my answer. I'll add, yes really, and yes, I'm sure.
  5. Correct. In all my years here, I've never heard of the question, "Have you ever been questioned by police?"
  6. You and your wife live together abroad. No need for any affidavits from friends. When you study instructions, do it carefully. You are reading from a list that is preceded by the words, "In addition to the required....." and "one or more of". Nothing on that list is required, and "one or more" does not mean "all". Just show your address history is the same, and maybe your resident status evidence showing you are together and skip anything you don't have or can't easily provide. The financial sponsorship issue isn't going to come up for a year or so. Deal with it then, based on the facts at that time. Current income is the KING in that regard.
  7. Correct....AND...the I-130 asks questions that are only applicable if the beneficiary is currently in the USA. No worries.
  8. Your visit was probably limited because your six month visit was followed to closely by your next visit.
  9. You actually answered correctly. Either maiden or married name is ok. You married Miss White and divorced Mrs. Brown. No issue, and nothing to fix. They will know Miss Smith is the Mrs. Brown you divorced.
  10. Sounds like this is more than Mary Smith, becoming Mary Jones after marrying Jim Jones. If so, provide evidence of the formal name change. If she only took a "married name" or change from maiden to married name, the marriage certificate is all that's needed. Ashley Brown, does not become Susan White, by simply marrying Mr. White.
  11. Not a problem, just clearly not the proper thing to do.
  12. Exactly. There a few artifacts in the instructions. For this, just do it.
  13. Enter today's date. Do NOT enter a signature date. There's no signature.
  14. It really does work, but it will populate the data from earlier entered data. You cannot type in those fields. Let them populate. https://get.adobe.com/reader/
  15. All good answers above, but they assume you and your husband cannot qualify based on assets alone. Take the income requirement for your household size and multiply by 3. That is the minimum amount of liquid assets you'll need to qualify based on assets alone. Note that you MUST "qualify" in some way or have a joint sponsor, or there will be no progress towards even a visa interview.
  16. Interpret literally. If it doesn't make sense, just do it anyway. Write or print the name. There is no request for a "signature".
  17. Correct answer is today's date. It will not be misunderstood.
  18. We commonly get asked to comment about a poster's interpretation of a notice or message of some kind. Often the interpretations are incorrect. With the actual wording combined with knowledge of the process, things get cleared up pretty quickly. A little different situation here, but same result.
  19. Not the same as charge. Sound like the letter described the purpose of the inquiry, not any "charge" like any "in context" translation would indicate. Sounds like a "no" to any questions about "arrest". She was never arrested and never charged with any crime. They investigated a possible crime and concluded there was no crime committed.
  20. What country and language? What's the word in the original language?
  21. You said she wasn't arrested. If that's true, she also would not have been charged. Check the record to be sure you answer correctly, but do not worry about this being grounds to deny the visa. Lying might be, but not the circumstances as you describe them.
  22. I ALWAYS recommend paper filing, because of this and other glitches in the online filing process. But, if you want to just leave those spaces blank, that will be fine too.
  23. So you are not missing the "or". It's the "if" you have interpreted correctly. However, "should have completed" does not mean "must submit". You did, so the necessary information is in your IRS Tax Return Transcript.
  24. Provided it is a Tax RETURN Transcript, you do not ALSO submit a complete tax return including all schedules. Pay attention to the little word "or" in instructions. It's often missed.
×
×
  • Create New...