pushbrk

For others reading and commenting, here's the situation as I see it and also a couple things I do NOT see, as they have not been mentioned. The foreign spouse Ukrainian, which is pretty much irrelevant. The father of her children is Namibian. Why they are not also Ukrainian is irrelevant, as they are in Africa, and the petitioner indicated all would apply for visas in S.A. where they live. The children do not have approved I-130s yet, so aren't part of the current issue except being counted in the household size. To really understand more, we would need to know answers to questions I've asked that have not been answered yet. The OP may not wish to answer those questions in this forum, but it limits our ability to assist and advise. We need to know exact wording in the denial letter. All that has been quoted are from form instruction. We need verbatim reasons given and exactly what the officer indicated was needed. Since there is no such thing as a co-sponsor, clearly that is not what was asked for. Perhaps they gave the option of a "joint sponsor". That would be a positive, and indicate it's less likely there are other issues besides the financial.

I drew NO conclusions. I'm describing things the Consular Officer would have considered. I don't have an opinion about the relationship.

You're going to need to enhance your evidence. Are their bank records showing these deposits? What kind of business is this? How will her absence impact future profits (from which her income will continue)?

OK. @Boiler asked about the 75k, and whether that's the amount she paid income tax on ie Profits. I mentioned other potential problems for you to consider. I still don't think the I-864a is the real problem. It's something else. Probably something Boiler or I mentioned. Given the children haven't reached NVC, they are definitely NOT considered to be "accompanying" her.

I asked if you filed three I-864 packages, one for each immigrant. I presume you did or you wouldn't have cleared NVC.

Right. Sorry. I neglected to consider the children. I'm not certain here children are CONSIDERED accompanying children, as they have their own petitions. Did you submit three sets of financial forms? I do NOT think the 864a is the actual problem though.

Another consideration in this kind of case is that the Consular Officer may not have said, but may have believed that BECAUSE the immigrant is the breadwinner, they entered into the relationship primarily for the immigration benefit, instead of a bona fide relationship. This also is part of the "totality of circumstances".

If you do that, submit a new properly completed I-864 with the wife's business income included. Don't use an I-864a. That was a mistake you made. Then, provide plenty of enhanced evidence that income will continue with her in the USA. An immigrant absolutely CAN effectively "self sponsor". It happens frequently, when the breadwinner is the immigrant, and their income will continue, or when the immigrant's liquid assets are used to qualify. Understand also, you are reading USCIS instructions. Consular Officers have similar guidelines but it is always a judgment call. In the situation you describe, an officer is going to consider the impact of your wife's absence on the continuing profitability of the business. Remember also, it is not the business revenue that counts. It's the profit. Officers are trained and required to consider the totality of circumstances in all cases, not just what you want them to consider.

First, you might be right about April, but any prediction of when in April is useless. Second, I advise filing the tax return as soon as possible, and take either a complete copy of the Return or Tax Return Transcript to the interview along with a more current pay stub.

I concur with the consolidated description of the relevant issues above. Do note though, there's no guarantee on the DCF part. I suspect your ultimate course, will simply be to wait to file anything until the child is adopted, and you have had legal custody for two years. Note also that the child becomes a citizen upon arrival as an immigrant, but husband gets a green card. (Lawful Permanent Resident Status).

Looks like a good list to me. But, for 8. stick to examples. Don't overdo it. For 9, leave it out. You sending money to her is not evidence of comingling finances. It is not YOUR sincerity that's being evaluated. It's hers.

If this is a spouse and step child or children, there should only be one AOS fee for the group. How are you related to these beneficiaries?

You send it to your fiancée to submit at the interview.