EM_Vandaveer

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems the confusion here is that you're reading "marriage" to mean "wedding celebration," whereas USCIS means "marriage" as "a marital relationship with a particular individual."

If people illegally in the US weren't "subject to its jurisdiction" then they could commit murder and not be arrested. That's obviously not the case.

If people illegally in the US weren't "subject to its jurisdiction" then they could commit murder and not be arrested. That's obviously not the case.

I don't understand #1. How can an EO overwrite the Constitution? Doesn't the Constitution state whoever is born in the US and is subject to its jurisdiction, is born a US citizen?

If people illegally in the US weren't "subject to its jurisdiction" then they could commit murder and not be arrested. That's obviously not the case.

I don't understand #1. How can an EO overwrite the Constitution? Doesn't the Constitution state whoever is born in the US and is subject to its jurisdiction, is born a US citizen?

Hello . I am unsure of what state you are in . Why are you not filing for VAWA please ? Speak to an information attorney . The divorce can take years it’s ok. As far as you have the proof of the assault and battery . You are good . Unless things have changed . I live in a state  where they do not tolerate that none sense especially with immigrants so we have loads of resources . It will get better don’t worry he is just scaring you . He cannot do anything . Know your resources and your rights . And go for a non profit immigration attorney as they are more beneficial to what you are seeking . Good luck . If you need to know what is VAWA . Let me know 

There's no "starting over", you have to convince either USCIS or immigration court that your original marriage to a USC was bona fide. 

There's no "starting over", you have to convince either USCIS or immigration court that your original marriage to a USC was bona fide. 

There's no "starting over", you have to convince either USCIS or immigration court that your original marriage to a USC was bona fide. 

There's no "starting over", you have to convince either USCIS or immigration court that your original marriage to a USC was bona fide. 

Fingers crossed for a successful outcome!

This wholly depends on *why* the original I-751 was denied. If it was denied on merits, then no future I-130 with you as a beneficiary can be approved and you’ll be deemed inadmissible. But yes, you can resubmit I-751 however if your original I-751 was denied on merits, you’re probably better off arguing for wrongful denial in immigration court. 

What a relief for you!  You got off cheaply, too.  Your sense of freedom must be overwhelming.  All the best to you.

It's over. Got my divorce today. I start new post today. No alimony. I agreed to pay her 2600 by March 9th. 

The bit about not filing I-130 is not important cause I-129F acts as if..but it does not matter since the I-134 is not enforceable and the I-864 was withdrawn. ..so even if she gets a last minute attorney, nothing they can do with that. ..so put your mind at ease.
 
 

At the last hearing when the judge realized we didn't have any marital propery or debit she Strongly emphasized we work things out in mediation, because we hadn't accumulated any debit or property together. She has nothing to loose so never showed up to mediation and wants a judge to decide. We go back on 1/22/24 for a status hearing.  

I don't see any red flags, unfortunately lots of marriages end in divorce. USCIS is aware of this.

Your husband ultimately has to prove to Immigration Court that his first marriage wasn't fraudulent and USCIS  denied his applications based on his first marriage in error. Without this, the new application based on the 2nd marriage is bound to be denied.

Your husband ultimately has to prove to Immigration Court that his first marriage wasn't fraudulent and USCIS  denied his applications based on his first marriage in error. Without this, the new application based on the 2nd marriage is bound to be denied.

Your husband ultimately has to prove to Immigration Court that his first marriage wasn't fraudulent and USCIS  denied his applications based on his first marriage in error. Without this, the new application based on the 2nd marriage is bound to be denied.

Your husband ultimately has to prove to Immigration Court that his first marriage wasn't fraudulent and USCIS  denied his applications based on his first marriage in error. Without this, the new application based on the 2nd marriage is bound to be denied.

Your husband ultimately has to prove to Immigration Court that his first marriage wasn't fraudulent and USCIS  denied his applications based on his first marriage in error. Without this, the new application based on the 2nd marriage is bound to be denied.

Your husband ultimately has to prove to Immigration Court that his first marriage wasn't fraudulent and USCIS  denied his applications based on his first marriage in error. Without this, the new application based on the 2nd marriage is bound to be denied.

Your husband ultimately has to prove to Immigration Court that his first marriage wasn't fraudulent and USCIS  denied his applications based on his first marriage in error. Without this, the new application based on the 2nd marriage is bound to be denied.