Jump to content

SalishSea

Members
  • Posts

    17,889
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    79

SalishSea last won the day on December 19 2024

SalishSea had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • City
    Seattle
  • State
    Washington

Immigration Info

  • Immigration Status
    Removing Conditions (approved)
  • Place benefits filed at
    Nebraska Service Center
  • Local Office
    Seattle WA
  • Country
    New Zealand

SalishSea's Achievements

Recent Profile Visitors

32,162 profile views
  1. How dare you come on my feed stating I’m soliciting advice for immigration fraud. Are you dumb? Didn’t you read what I posted originally? I know way more about immigration than you (I’ve been a member at visa journey since 2009).

  2. You are absolutely here soliciting assistance on how to conduct immigration fraud. I’ve reported this thread as it goes against the TOS you agreed to when you signed up for VJ.
  3. Doesn’t their age exempt them from the English/civics test requirement anyway?
  4. You can try, but I doubt you would get a response. I would definitely include everything that was returned to you, as well as any new evidence of time spent together in person. From what you have told us, I don't see any glaring problems with your case; you have plenty of in-person time, you just need to show it to them at the interview.
  5. I did read it. It wasn't clearly explained that the evidence returned to the OP was not part of the original petition to USCIS, but was unsolicited evidence sent directly to the consulate. That information is important in this situation.
  6. What Jan said makes a lot of sense- and is quite charitable if they are actually giving you a chance to strengthen your case prior to the interview. That’s really unheard of. My other thought was that it was in error. Either way, gathering additional high quality (in-person) evidence prior to July is the right move. Good luck!
  7. In 9 years of reading VJ, I’ve never heard of a 221g being issued by a consulate prior to an interview. Seems as if they are fixing to issue a NOID and return the petition to USCIS. How much in-person time have you had?
  8. IANAL, but I would think that since you have evidence of a legal name change (in the form of the adoption decree), that would be all you need. You could include a well-written, succinct letter explaining the situation and the supporting documentation.
  9. A few years ago, they were taking 6 months. Processing times for all forms across the immigration spectrum vary all the time.
  10. No, as it wouldn't continue after you're in the US. You will need a joint sponsor.
  11. The delay is that if you submit 1000 pages of unsolicited evidence, they are required to look at it all. There are posts on VJ about RFEs that came about because of such evidence, i.e. content of chats that raised questions during adjudication.
  12. As USCIS views consummation of marital relationships to be "in each other's presence," the issue of "conjugal" visits is a non-issue.
  13. This is not a place where you will find legal advice. This is a DIY site.
  14. I would discourage it just because it delays processing, and it opens up opportunities for RFEs. All of our petitions and applications have included only what was asked for by USCIS, and we have had no delays or RFEs. As always, YMMV.
  15. Have you read the requirements/instructions for the petition? You need evidence of having met in the prior two years, for one. This is best done via passport stamps/boarding passes etc. Extra fluff, such as snapshots and chat logs are not required or even recommended in most cases. The question about the consulate is not a frivolous one. The type of "front-loading" you are suggesting is appropriate for some consulates, and not relevant to others. And the reason to consider that prior to the interview, is that unlike spousal visas, you will not have the opportunity to add subsequent "relatiohship evidence" to a K-1.
×
×
  • Create New...