Jump to content

pushbrk

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    40,649

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    63

pushbrk last won the day on May 5

pushbrk had the most liked content!

88 Followers

See all followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • City
    Dumaguete

Immigration Info

  • Immigration Status
    Other
  • Place benefits filed at
    California Service Center
  • Local Office
    Spokane WA
  • Country
    China
  • Our Story
    The marriage associated with immigration ended after 12 years.

Immigration Timeline & Photos

pushbrk's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • Amazing Content Rare
  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • Helpful Reply Rare

Recent Badges

14.5k

Reputation

Recent Profile Visitors

83,859 profile views
  1.    S2N reacted to a post in a topic: Which evidence to include for I-130 long distance
  2.    TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic: Which evidence to include for I-130 long distance
  3.    Crazy Cat reacted to a post in a topic: Which evidence to include for I-130 long distance
  4.    Crazy Cat reacted to a post in a topic: Which evidence to include for I-130 long distance
  5. pushbrk
    I'm just going to say again, get the actual facts of her visa application, not a convenient interpretation of her explanation.
  6. pushbrk
    Please be specific. "Mentioned during the application" is not specific enough. Either a marital status was declared on the actual application of it was discussed DURING the interview. Was "Union Libre" entered into the application form, or was it an available status to be selected (doubtful). The only "during" is the interview. If she represented herself as "married" to show ties to her home country, when she was not married, that can be a material misrepresentation resulting in a lifetime ban from entering the USA. Get completely clear on this before moving forward. It's a very serious matter. Convenient interpretation of an explanation is not good enough. Get the actual facts.
  7.    TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic: Which evidence to include for I-130 long distance
  8.    TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic: Which evidence to include for I-130 long distance
  9.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: Which evidence to include for I-130 long distance
  10. pushbrk
    In what way was the relationship mentioned? Was it in the interview conversation, or on the visa application? If on the application, what exactly did she state as her marital status on the application?
  11.    Crazy Cat reacted to a post in a topic: Which evidence to include for I-130 long distance
  12. pushbrk
    Please clarify how exactly and why this relationship was mentioned in her visa application. Did she claim to be married to this man? If so, did she indicate the relationship was common law? My concern is that this can be considered a misrepresentation in her prior visa application. Details matter in this context.
  13.    Crazy Cat reacted to a post in a topic: K-1 Visa - DS-260 Requested?
  14.    jma132 reacted to a post in a topic: Which evidence to include for I-130 long distance
  15. pushbrk
    Correct. The DS260 is not part of the green card process after entering with a K1 visa. This letter does not request a DS 260. It requests a confirmation page. Send the one you have for the DS 160.
  16.    Crazy Cat reacted to a post in a topic: Which evidence to include for I-130 long distance
  17. pushbrk
    You had two weeks together in person and then communicated for a few months prior to marrying. When you married, you had more time together. That's pretty normal for an international relationship. Nobody cares if it seems rushed in this context. Don't open the can of worms of carrying on a long distance relationship while she was in a committed relationship. No reason to mention the other guy at all. They weren't married, and your real relationship started after than one ended. You have plenty of evidence, to get the I-130 approved, and you'll have more between now and the visa interview.
  18. pushbrk
    1. No 2. She's right. Scrap all evidence before your in person time in 2025 3. Only if previous relationship is asked about would it need to be explained, in very simple direct terms.
  19. pushbrk
    A complete Federal Tax return with all schedules, W2s and 1099s is perfectly acceptable. Note that for an employed person the "Total Income" number from the tax return goes in the tax return section. Current income does not come from a tax return though. That comes from a pay stub. Gross pay for a full pay period times the number of those periods in a full year. Every two weeks is times 26. Twice a month is times 24, etc.
  20. pushbrk
    Directly to your concerns, USCIS is not the problem. Where he will or won't be allowed to interview is what is critical. There's always a chance he'll be deported from Sweden to Turkey. If you are already married, what will YOU do?
  21. pushbrk
    Nobody can tell you for sure whether he will be allowed to interview in Sweden. That is not a USCIS decision. Approved I-130 decisions are sent to the National Visa Center, but it's up to the Immigrant Visa unit in Sweden whether they will allow him to interview there. No, his status in Sweden does not impact either the petition approval or the visa beyond whether he will be allowed to interview in Sweden. With all that in mind, the decision to marry is a weighty one indeed.
  22. pushbrk
    Whether the K1 will be "viable" is not really the prime issue. A K1 from Pakistan, while "viable" is not something I would recommend. Spend some time together and take the spouse visa route. Yeah, the title says Pakistani fiance but asks about Morroco.
  23. pushbrk
    No.
  24. pushbrk
    It's the UK. The record probably matches what pretty much every resident there will have received. The physician at the medical exam will know that. Relax
  25. pushbrk
    This is a non-issue. Just enroll her.
  26.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: K-2 and school enrollment
  27.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: case got transferred to country of nationality while i dont live there
  28. pushbrk
    So, wait for them (NVC) to respond notifying you of the transfer to KL. Mumbai is where the only Immigrant Visa Unit for the USA is in India. Yes, we used to refer to that city as Bombay. A number of cities now have correct names on maps. You can blame the brits for the earlier mistakes. For example they couldn't pronounce Guangzhou, so they called in Canton. Go figure.
×
×
  • Create New...