Jump to content

pushbrk

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    40,653

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    63

pushbrk last won the day on May 5

pushbrk had the most liked content!

88 Followers

See all followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • City
    Dumaguete

Immigration Info

  • Immigration Status
    Other
  • Place benefits filed at
    California Service Center
  • Local Office
    Spokane WA
  • Country
    China
  • Our Story
    The marriage associated with immigration ended after 12 years.

Immigration Timeline & Photos

pushbrk's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • Amazing Content Rare
  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • Helpful Reply Rare

Recent Badges

14.5k

Reputation

Recent Profile Visitors

83,898 profile views
  1.    TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic: Which evidence to include for I-130 long distance
  2.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: Which evidence to include for I-130 long distance
  3.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: I-864
  4.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: I-864
  5. pushbrk
    Select Federal Income Tax return, and I would upload a single PDF with all included.
  6. pushbrk
    If no such thing exists in the DR, this could be a problem, not with USCIS but if it is at interview, she'll need to explain it honestly and directly, and the consequences will be what they will be. There are countries that actually have civil union or domestic partnerships but the DR is not one of them. Neither is recognized there. Actions have consequences. You may will have to wait about 18 months after filing to find out what this little deception's consequences will be, if any.
  7.    STDEV reacted to a post in a topic: I-864 tax return upload clarification
  8.    appleblossom reacted to a post in a topic: Short Tax & Income History, Self-Employment | Seeking Feedback for Unique Form I-134 Situation
  9.    appleblossom reacted to a post in a topic: Short Tax & Income History, Self-Employment | Seeking Feedback for Unique Form I-134 Situation
  10.    TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic: Short Tax & Income History, Self-Employment | Seeking Feedback for Unique Form I-134 Situation
  11.    Lemonslice reacted to a post in a topic: Short Tax & Income History, Self-Employment | Seeking Feedback for Unique Form I-134 Situation
  12.    Lemonslice reacted to a post in a topic: Short Tax & Income History, Self-Employment | Seeking Feedback for Unique Form I-134 Situation
  13. pushbrk
    For a self employed person, income comes from a federal tax return. If you are currently employed, that's very different. You are either employed or you are not. It's not a matter of appearance. If you are employed, then a single normal pay stub that shows gross pay and year to date pay, is sufficient evidence of current "income". Take the gross for a full pay period times the number of those pay periods that would occur in a full year. Every two weeks is times 26, etc. Be very direct on your I-134 that you are employed and your occupation. Don't confuse any of these issues by using the term self employed. Your father's past income or business tax returns are not relevant to your current income.
  14.    T22 reacted to a post in a topic: Short Tax & Income History, Self-Employment | Seeking Feedback for Unique Form I-134 Situation
  15.    TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic: Short Tax & Income History, Self-Employment | Seeking Feedback for Unique Form I-134 Situation
  16. pushbrk
    You will not qualify as the sponsor. If your fiance is coming from Thailand or the Philippines, you will not be allowed to use a cosponsor either. You cannot state any income at all, at this point. The current income for a self employed person, comes from their latest tax return. You don't have one. Further, do not confuse business revenue with income. Income is what's left over after subtracting business expenses. Showing current business revenue will not help. Which country? Do you have a cosponsor in mind?
  17.    S2N reacted to a post in a topic: Which evidence to include for I-130 long distance
  18. pushbrk
    I'm just going to say again, get the actual facts of her visa application, not a convenient interpretation of her explanation.
  19. pushbrk
    Please be specific. "Mentioned during the application" is not specific enough. Either a marital status was declared on the actual application of it was discussed DURING the interview. Was "Union Libre" entered into the application form, or was it an available status to be selected (doubtful). The only "during" is the interview. If she represented herself as "married" to show ties to her home country, when she was not married, that can be a material misrepresentation resulting in a lifetime ban from entering the USA. Get completely clear on this before moving forward. It's a very serious matter. Convenient interpretation of an explanation is not good enough. Get the actual facts.
  20.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: Which evidence to include for I-130 long distance
  21. pushbrk
    In what way was the relationship mentioned? Was it in the interview conversation, or on the visa application? If on the application, what exactly did she state as her marital status on the application?
  22. pushbrk
    Please clarify how exactly and why this relationship was mentioned in her visa application. Did she claim to be married to this man? If so, did she indicate the relationship was common law? My concern is that this can be considered a misrepresentation in her prior visa application. Details matter in this context.
  23. pushbrk
    Correct. The DS260 is not part of the green card process after entering with a K1 visa. This letter does not request a DS 260. It requests a confirmation page. Send the one you have for the DS 160.
  24. pushbrk
    You had two weeks together in person and then communicated for a few months prior to marrying. When you married, you had more time together. That's pretty normal for an international relationship. Nobody cares if it seems rushed in this context. Don't open the can of worms of carrying on a long distance relationship while she was in a committed relationship. No reason to mention the other guy at all. They weren't married, and your real relationship started after than one ended. You have plenty of evidence, to get the I-130 approved, and you'll have more between now and the visa interview.
  25. pushbrk
    1. No 2. She's right. Scrap all evidence before your in person time in 2025 3. Only if previous relationship is asked about would it need to be explained, in very simple direct terms.
  26. pushbrk
    A complete Federal Tax return with all schedules, W2s and 1099s is perfectly acceptable. Note that for an employed person the "Total Income" number from the tax return goes in the tax return section. Current income does not come from a tax return though. That comes from a pay stub. Gross pay for a full pay period times the number of those periods in a full year. Every two weeks is times 26. Twice a month is times 24, etc.
  27. pushbrk
    Directly to your concerns, USCIS is not the problem. Where he will or won't be allowed to interview is what is critical. There's always a chance he'll be deported from Sweden to Turkey. If you are already married, what will YOU do?
  28. pushbrk
    Nobody can tell you for sure whether he will be allowed to interview in Sweden. That is not a USCIS decision. Approved I-130 decisions are sent to the National Visa Center, but it's up to the Immigrant Visa unit in Sweden whether they will allow him to interview there. No, his status in Sweden does not impact either the petition approval or the visa beyond whether he will be allowed to interview in Sweden. With all that in mind, the decision to marry is a weighty one indeed.
  29. pushbrk
    Whether the K1 will be "viable" is not really the prime issue. A K1 from Pakistan, while "viable" is not something I would recommend. Spend some time together and take the spouse visa route. Yeah, the title says Pakistani fiance but asks about Morroco.
×
×
  • Create New...