Jump to content

pushbrk

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    40,169

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

pushbrk last won the day on September 2

pushbrk had the most liked content!

88 Followers

See all followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • City
    Dumaguete

Immigration Info

  • Immigration Status
    Other
  • Place benefits filed at
    California Service Center
  • Local Office
    Spokane WA
  • Country
    China
  • Our Story
    The marriage associated with immigration ended after 12 years.

Immigration Timeline & Photos

pushbrk's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • Amazing Content Rare
  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • First Post

Recent Badges

13.8k

Reputation

Recent Profile Visitors

80,284 profile views
  1. pushbrk
    I understand the belt and suspenders mind set, but I don't subscribe to it in this context. Avoiding obligating a joint sponsor when not absolutely necessary would be my priority. YMMV
  2.    OldUser reacted to a post in a topic: Expedite request for pending forms I-130 for minor children
  3. pushbrk
    Everything has a context. The reason you would file an I-864 with no income or assets is that the petitioner is required to do so in that circumstance. In such a case, a joint sponsor would be required. In the OP's situation, they clearly qualify, and the home equity would be considered within its context as part of the totality of circumstances. By your logic marriages fail often, so why would anybody try it? Qualifying as sponsor using assets is allowed. It requires properly completed affidavit and properly documented qualifying assets. Anything marginal is risky, but those will clearly qualifying finances are routinely successful using assets to sponsor an immigrant.
  4. pushbrk
    This is an example of documentation and completion errors. They qualified, but what they presented did not make that clear enough.
  5.    Edward and Jaycel reacted to a post in a topic: I-864 Question – Using Assets to Qualify
  6. pushbrk
    Easier for me, as I primarily hang out in the spouse visa forum. However it is not correct that USCIS or Consular Officers "do not allow" equity in a primary resident to be used as an asset. What's true is they don't consider it liquid. In this case, they will know the sponsor has lower expenses because they pay no rent, and they have sufficient liquid assets to make up for the income shortfall.
  7.    Reynal2m reacted to a post in a topic: I-864 Question – Using Assets to Qualify
  8.    Reynal2m reacted to a post in a topic: I-864 Question – Using Assets to Qualify
  9. pushbrk
    Too general. When done properly, this should be fine. It's the D/R, not India.
  10.    Edward and Jaycel reacted to a post in a topic: I-864 Question – Using Assets to Qualify
  11. pushbrk
    USCIS will not be involved in the financial part of the decision on a spouse visa case. That is all submitted to NVC and the Consulate.
  12. pushbrk
    The 90k in the bank can carry the day. Just a few statements with the oldest being at least a year old will do. With regard to the apartment, sure listing it as an assets and documenting the equity is certainly allowed, but when evaluated, the equity will not be considered liquid. What it's good for is to show you don't pay rent, and are solvent. USCIS has nothing to do with evaluating an Affidavit of Support in a spouse visa case. That will be NVC and a Consular Officer.
  13.    Lance27 reacted to a post in a topic: Expedite request for pending forms I-130 for minor children
  14.    Dashinka reacted to a post in a topic: Expedite request for pending forms I-130 for minor children
  15.    Dashinka reacted to a post in a topic: Expedite request for pending forms I-130 for minor children
  16.    Dashinka reacted to a post in a topic: Expedite request for pending forms I-130 for minor children
  17.    mam521 reacted to a post in a topic: Expedite request for pending forms I-130 for minor children
  18. pushbrk
    Time to "come to jesus" on this. You were advised properly back in February.
  19. pushbrk
    Just so you understand, you must do this before you file petitions for the children. If you file and they get denied at interview, your husband will have a visa that expires in six months and your children will have nothing and no way to accompany your husband to the USA.
  20. pushbrk
    Do you mean you DID NOT MEET the physical presence requirements. If so, have you looking into your children's citizenship through your parents. (Grandparents, as mention in the previous topic)
  21.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: Expedite request for pending forms I-130 for minor children
  22. pushbrk
    If petitions are needed for the children, the above is certainly ok to try, but don't get your hopes up. It's the petitioner's responsibility to do their homework. It's pretty difficult for any politician to spend their political capital when USCIS and NVC have done nothing wrong.
  23. pushbrk
    The question relates to the children being biological children of the US Citizen petitioner. If the US Citizen petitioner was a USC at the time of each child'e birth and meets the physical presence requirement, they don't need visas. They need Consular Reports of Birth Abroad, and US Passports. Please clarify whether the petitioner was a US Citizen when each child was born, and whether they lived in the USA at least 5 years, one year of which was after turning age 14. If so, they are US Citizens and cannot be issued immigrant visas. You take the CRBA, and US Passport route.
  24.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: Questions regarding the I-129F form - addresses
  25.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: Questions regarding the I-129F form - addresses
  26. pushbrk
    The actions you did not take (filing the childrens' petitions when you filed for your spouse) are the reasons for any separation. What you can do to avoid separation now, is to delay your spouse's interview until they can all go together. Are these the petitioner's step children or their natural children?
  27. pushbrk
    Be cautious of any advice from others about whether you should do it yourself. They know nothing more about your aptitude, attitude, or capability to do homework, read carefully, interpret literally, and respond accuratly, than that you found the wrong forum on this website and hijacked a post in the wrong forum. Make your own decision based on those factors. The partner page is there for good reason. https://www.visajourney.com/partners/
  28. Tonyhoang started following pushbrk
  29. pushbrk
    The above suggestions are great for an initial submission, but mostly would look contrived, if done at this stage. Anything created after receiving the NOID, is weak, at best. Seems there is plenty of non-contrived evidence available that was not submitted initially.
×
×
  • Create New...