Jump to content

pushbrk

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    40,664

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    63

pushbrk last won the day on May 5

pushbrk had the most liked content!

88 Followers

See all followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • City
    Dumaguete

Immigration Info

  • Immigration Status
    Other
  • Place benefits filed at
    California Service Center
  • Local Office
    Spokane WA
  • Country
    China
  • Our Story
    The marriage associated with immigration ended after 12 years.

Immigration Timeline & Photos

pushbrk's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • Amazing Content Rare
  • Helpful Reply Rare
  • Helpful Reply Rare

Recent Badges

14.6k

Reputation

Recent Profile Visitors

83,940 profile views
  1.    TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic: USCIS Policy Memorandum "U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Will Grant ‘Adjustment of Status’ Only in Extraordinary Circumstances"
  2. pushbrk
    Yes, and I don't see this memo impacting the immigrant path for that situation.
  3.    TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic: I-129F - Proof of Meeting and Proof of Ongoing Relationship
  4.    TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic: USCIS Policy Memorandum "U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Will Grant ‘Adjustment of Status’ Only in Extraordinary Circumstances"
  5. pushbrk
    They would have had an I-130 filed for them, only if they were a qualifying alien relative of a US Citizen. This guidance is not about qualifying alien relatives.
  6.    JeanneAdil reacted to a post in a topic: USCIS Policy Memorandum "U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Will Grant ‘Adjustment of Status’ Only in Extraordinary Circumstances"
  7. pushbrk
    I don't see this as having any impact on the spouse or stepchild of a US Citizen who entered legally with a K1 or K2. It's just reminding their staff of the law and that a legitimate immigrant path must be present. For an overstayer, it would seem a bona fide marital relationship with a US Citizen would still be the legitimate immigrant path available to them.
  8. pushbrk
    Words mean things. Ticket confirmations can be helpful to clarify an itinerary, but are not evidence of travel. Passport stamps, and boarding passes are. So are hotel and other receipts in country. Concentrate on actual evidence. It seems you have plenty but didn't provide any with the petition originally. The other place you failed can be fixed with a short statement or letter now. It's the part from page 8 number 54. Photos together are good, but they are secondary to the primary evidence of being together. A few weeks ago, I saw a photo of a friend and his girlfriend sitting in a convertible somewhere in Australia. I didn't know them well, so I asked how long they lived in Australia. The answer is she's never been there. Artificial Intelligence created the photo of them. Fooled me.
  9.    TBoneTX reacted to a post in a topic: I-129F - Proof of Meeting and Proof of Ongoing Relationship
  10. pushbrk
    No, don't send 1,200+ pages. And text alone is not evidence. A few (no more than a dozen) screen shots of portions of chats could help, but not unless they are in English. It seems you sent next to nothing originally, and didn't do a good job on the form section that asks about your meeting. Explain it in a one page statement, then provide the primary evidence of time spent together in person.
  11.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: Received RFE for criminal convivtion records, plus question about what constitutes a "document" for official translation purposes
  12.    Bigfish1972 reacted to a post in a topic: Received RFE for criminal convivtion records, plus question about what constitutes a "document" for official translation purposes
  13.    Bigfish1972 reacted to a post in a topic: Received RFE for criminal convivtion records, plus question about what constitutes a "document" for official translation purposes
  14.    MrMooCow reacted to a post in a topic: I-129F - Proof of Meeting and Proof of Ongoing Relationship
  15.    Edward and Jaycel reacted to a post in a topic: I-129F - Proof of Meeting and Proof of Ongoing Relationship
  16.    Edward and Jaycel reacted to a post in a topic: Received RFE for criminal convivtion records, plus question about what constitutes a "document" for official translation purposes
  17. pushbrk
    I suppose the translator is "under the penalty of perjury" but the translator does not need to include that phrase in their certification.
  18. pushbrk
    As you already stated in your first post, "If you submit a document in any language other than English, the document must be accompanied by a full and complete English translation. The translator must certify that the translation is accurate and he or she is competent to translate from that language to English". There's nothing in there about the translator being certified by anybody or any organization. Yes, anybody fluent in both languages, also competent and willing, can certify a translation, even if they are the author of what is being translated.
  19. pushbrk
    Not a certified translator. In this context there is no such thing. The translator certifies they are fluent in both languages and that the translation is correct and complete. Yes, the certified translation is required because the communication was specifically requested.
  20. pushbrk
    Yes, if the specific first communication was requested and was in Spanish, you'll need to include a translation and for the translator to certify it. Use an image of the conversation, not just a transcription or copy and paste. Copying and pasting text is not evidence.
  21.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: Tokyo embassy - Refused by Section 221(g)
  22. pushbrk
    You say your translations are from a "certified translator". They are probably fine, but it is the translator that certifies the translations. USCIS does not certify translators. I would skip the communication records in Spanish and concentrate on evidence of time spent together in person, like passport stamps or boarding passes, and hotel receipts etc.
  23. pushbrk
    Having paid for a ticket is not primary evidence of travel. I pay for a one-way ticket to somewhere outside the Philippines every time I enter, but I cancel that ticket within 24 hours and never use it for travel. If you don't have passport stamps, use boarding passes which ARE evidence of travel. If she's been in the USA, download her I-94 and travel history here. https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/home
  24.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: I-864 tax return upload clarification
  25.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: I-864
  26.    pushbrk reacted to a post in a topic: I-864
  27. pushbrk
    Select Federal Income Tax return, and I would upload a single PDF with all included.
  28. pushbrk
    For a self employed person, income comes from a federal tax return. If you are currently employed, that's very different. You are either employed or you are not. It's not a matter of appearance. If you are employed, then a single normal pay stub that shows gross pay and year to date pay, is sufficient evidence of current "income". Take the gross for a full pay period times the number of those pay periods that would occur in a full year. Every two weeks is times 26, etc. Be very direct on your I-134 that you are employed and your occupation. Don't confuse any of these issues by using the term self employed. Your father's past income or business tax returns are not relevant to your current income.
  29. pushbrk
    You will not qualify as the sponsor. If your fiance is coming from Thailand or the Philippines, you will not be allowed to use a cosponsor either. You cannot state any income at all, at this point. The current income for a self employed person, comes from their latest tax return. You don't have one. Further, do not confuse business revenue with income. Income is what's left over after subtracting business expenses. Showing current business revenue will not help. Which country? Do you have a cosponsor in mind?
  30. pushbrk
    Correct. The DS260 is not part of the green card process after entering with a K1 visa. This letter does not request a DS 260. It requests a confirmation page. Send the one you have for the DS 160.
×
×
  • Create New...