One Soldier Against the Empire

[one...two...tree 2,762]

By Elizabeth de la Vega, Tomdispatch.com.

I met a peace hero at Camp Democracy in Washington, D.C. not too long ago: Sgt. Ricky Clousing. He will not remember me, but I will not forget him. On a brilliant, blessedly unhumid day, Ricky sat on a makeshift platform within shouting distance of the Lincoln Memorial and told a story that was simultaneously agonizing and inspiring to hear.

On September 11, 2001, Ricky was working in an orphanage and "building some roads and stuff" in Thailand. When his stint as a volunteer ended, he made his way to Germany where he met American soldiers returning from Afghanistan. Caught up in the wave of post-9/11 patriotism, he decided he would join the Army rather than return to college in his native Seattle. That way he could serve his country and have money for his education when he got out. Two years later, having completed basic training and intensive language instruction at the Monterey Defense Language Institute, Sgt. Ricky Clousing found himself in Baghdad, an interrogator with the 82nd Airborne Division out of Ft. Bragg, North Carolina.

As a tactical interrogator assigned to question detainees at the scene of infantry raids, Ricky did not witness the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib. What he did witness, however, was hardly less horrifying: American soldiers indoctrinated to view Iraqis as less than human, as "ragheads" or worse; American soldiers out on the streets of the Iraqi capital ramming the cars of Iraqi civilians for sport; American soldiers laughing as they slaughtered the livestock of local farmers; and American soldiers shooting an Iraqi teenager who had simply made a wrong turn.

Ricky was on patrol when he saw a boy, "probably 18 years old, a small maybe high-school age kid" turn down a road his unit was attempting to secure. The teenager, Ricky said, was quite visibly terrified at the sight of "a whole bunch of Americans with big weapons" staring him in the face. He started turning the car around, but didn't get very far. This is how Ricky described what happened next:

"One of the soldiers in the turret of the humvee behind me just opened up fire on the machine gun on the vehicle. As the vehicle was turning away, all I heard above my head was "pop, pop, pop, pop." This was my first deployment, my first combat experience was that moment right then, and just the sound of machine guns going off over my head. He popped about five or six rounds in the side of the vehicle. Myself and two of the other guys ran over to the vehicle, smashed the window, and pulled the guy out to provide first aid on him... I was looking down at this kid who had just been shot in the stomach for no reason really -- he was trying to leave...I was still just standing there in shock, looking down at this kid, and he looked right up at me. And his mouth was foaming. His stomach was falling out in his hands... I was looking down at this kid, this young boy who was just trying to drive around town and took a wrong turn and tried to go the other direction, was shot at and killed, and I'm looking down at him now. And we made eye contact for about five seconds, and he just looked at me with the most empty, terrified look in his face that will never leave me in my whole life I'm sure."

That Iraqi boy died on the way to the hospital. I think the boy in Ricky Clousing died that day as well, but what an extraordinary man he has since become. Deciding he would be haunted forever if he kept silent about such an egregious violation of the rules of engagement, Sgt. Clousing notified the unit's Platoon Sergeant, who did not "take kindly" to his advice.

Clousing continued to object to American war crimes for the rest of his time in Iraq, though no one ever took kindly to his objections. When he returned to the U.S., he talked to his commanding officers, to the chaplain, to mental health workers and anyone else who would listen to his problems with the invasion and occupation of Iraq. He was told he could get out of the Army -- if he said he was gay. But he couldn't say that because he's not gay. He was told to claim he had post-traumatic stress disorder, but he couldn't do that because he didn't think he had PTSD. He was told to file as a conscientious objector; but he couldn't do that because he wasn't against all war. He was told he could avoid going back to Iraq by taking an assignment in the United States. He couldn't do that either because -- and this is exactly what Ricky Clousing told us on that sunny afternoon in Washington:

"I felt that my involvement in the army, whether it be directly or indirectly, whether in Iraq or training guys to go to Iraq, I was still that piece of machine in the system that was still allowing this war to take place and still supporting that. My actions, whether or not they were on the front line or back safely at home, were still part of the body of the machine that's occupying [iraq]. So I ultimately felt that the only thing I could do was to leave, so I packed my stuff last June and I went AWOL."

On August 11, 2006, the day he turned himself in, Sgt. Clousing made a simple statement:

"We have found ourselves in a pivotal era where we have traded humanity for patriotism. Where we have traded our civil liberties for a sense of security. I stand here before you sharing the same idea as Henry David Thoreau: as a soldier, as an American, and as a human being, we mustn't lend ourselves to that same evil which we condemn."

Ricky Clousing -- now serving a three-month sentence in a military brig at Camp Lejeune in North Carolina -- is not the only peace hero. Others are making themselves known in growing numbers and you can read about them at the Courage to Resist website. Although we have no way of assessing the numbers from here, I have no doubt that there are also soldiers trying to do the right thing in Iraq.

But when I read about a President who doesn't know the meaning of "outrages upon human dignity" because he so clearly does not consider the very people he claims to have liberated human; when I read about a vice president who does not even have the courage to admit to the meaning of the words he uses ("dunk in the water," "last throes"); when I read about a defense secretary who tells reporters to back off if the questions get too tough, then I think about Ricky Clousing.

Twenty-four years old, Clousing told the world in simple declarative sentences why he had to give up his college money, receive a dishonorable discharge, and go to jail to take a stand against the invasion and occupation of Iraq. He'd make a very cool action figure. Come to think of it, Sgt. Ricky Clousing -- tattooed arms, Laguna Beach t-shirt, and all -- would make an awesome shepherd in that manger scene. Han Solo and Luke Skywalker are just going to have to move over.

Elizabeth de la Vega is a former federal prosecutor. Her pieces have appeared in The Nation, the L.A. Times, Salon, and Mother Jones.

[Ban Hammer 13,342]

yup, shades of vietnam. where those who desert are given air time and praise.

[GaryC 7]

Elizabeth de la Vega is a former federal prosecutor. Her pieces have appeared in The Nation, the L.A. Times, Salon, and Mother Jones.

Those are some real credible referals. All so left wing it makes you want to puke. Tells you where this womans head is at.

[Scott & Lai 12]

Elizabeth de la Vega is a former federal prosecutor. Her pieces have appeared in The Nation, the L.A. Times, Salon, and Mother Jones.

Those are some real credible referals. All so left wing it makes you want to puke. Tells you where this womans head is at.

Now, now, only Fox News is biased, remember?

[Ban Hammer 13,342]

Elizabeth de la Vega is a former federal prosecutor. Her pieces have appeared in The Nation, the L.A. Times, Salon, and Mother Jones.

Those are some real credible referals. All so left wing it makes you want to puke. Tells you where this womans head is at.

Now, now, only Fox News is biased, remember?

yeah, that's right, according to the dems........so it must be true!

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Elizabeth de la Vega is a former federal prosecutor. Her pieces have appeared in The Nation, the L.A. Times, Salon, and Mother Jones.

Those are some real credible referals. All so left wing it makes you want to puke. Tells you where this womans head is at.

How about this source then...

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/281053_peacevets12.html

Soldier surrenders a year after walking away from base

By MIKE BARBER

"I was with an infantry unit that kicked in doors to mosques and houses," Clousing said. "Being with tactical infantry exposed me to the brutality of war," he said, including what he said was the baseless incarceration of Iraqis by U.S. forces and a U.S. soldier's killing of an innocent Iraq man.

Clousing said his military convictions turned when, "despite our guidelines, I witnessed baseless incarceration ... daily physical, emotional and psychological harassment of Iraqi citizens" and unnecessary vandalism by U.S. troops.

Most haunting, he said, was seeing an innocent Iraqi get killed.

Clousing alleges that he saw a young Iraqi man shot after straying into an area Clousing was helping other troops secure following a roadside bombing.

"He was in a vehicle driving 15 mph," Clousing said. "He was obviously terrified at seeing U.S. troops with guns drawn." A soldier behind him opened fire without warning, killing the man.

"I reported it to my superiors. ... I was told I did not know the reality of war and this kind of thing happens," Clousing said.

[Ban Hammer 13,342]

Elizabeth de la Vega is a former federal prosecutor. Her pieces have appeared in The Nation, the L.A. Times, Salon, and Mother Jones.

Those are some real credible referals. All so left wing it makes you want to puke. Tells you where this womans head is at.

How about this source then...

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/281053_peacevets12.html

Soldier surrenders a year after walking away from base

By MIKE BARBER

"I was with an infantry unit that kicked in doors to mosques and houses," Clousing said. "Being with tactical infantry exposed me to the brutality of war," he said, including what he said was the baseless incarceration of Iraqis by U.S. forces and a U.S. soldier's killing of an innocent Iraq man.

Clousing said his military convictions turned when, "despite our guidelines, I witnessed baseless incarceration ... daily physical, emotional and psychological harassment of Iraqi citizens" and unnecessary vandalism by U.S. troops.

Most haunting, he said, was seeing an innocent Iraqi get killed.

Clousing alleges that he saw a young Iraqi man shot after straying into an area Clousing was helping other troops secure following a roadside bombing.

"He was in a vehicle driving 15 mph," Clousing said. "He was obviously terrified at seeing U.S. troops with guns drawn." A soldier behind him opened fire without warning, killing the man.

"I reported it to my superiors. ... I was told I did not know the reality of war and this kind of thing happens," Clousing said.

ah more of the same. got your white flag already, steven?

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Elizabeth de la Vega is a former federal prosecutor. Her pieces have appeared in The Nation, the L.A. Times, Salon, and Mother Jones.

Those are some real credible referals. All so left wing it makes you want to puke. Tells you where this womans head is at.

How about this source then...

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/281053_peacevets12.html

Soldier surrenders a year after walking away from base

By MIKE BARBER

"I was with an infantry unit that kicked in doors to mosques and houses," Clousing said. "Being with tactical infantry exposed me to the brutality of war," he said, including what he said was the baseless incarceration of Iraqis by U.S. forces and a U.S. soldier's killing of an innocent Iraq man.

Clousing said his military convictions turned when, "despite our guidelines, I witnessed baseless incarceration ... daily physical, emotional and psychological harassment of Iraqi citizens" and unnecessary vandalism by U.S. troops.

Most haunting, he said, was seeing an innocent Iraqi get killed.

Clousing alleges that he saw a young Iraqi man shot after straying into an area Clousing was helping other troops secure following a roadside bombing.

"He was in a vehicle driving 15 mph," Clousing said. "He was obviously terrified at seeing U.S. troops with guns drawn." A soldier behind him opened fire without warning, killing the man.

"I reported it to my superiors. ... I was told I did not know the reality of war and this kind of thing happens," Clousing said.

ah more of the same. got your white flag already, steven?

Are you saying he's lying? It's peculiar how selective you are about who's opinions and testimonies are valid and which ones you easily dismiss.

[Ban Hammer 13,342]

Are you saying he's lying? It's peculiar how selective you are about who's opinions and testimonies are valid and which ones you easily dismiss.

you do that all the time, don't you?

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Are you saying he's lying? It's peculiar how selective you are about who's opinions and testimonies are valid and which ones you easily dismiss.

you do that all the time, don't you?

Really? You've read where I've easily dismissed testimony or opinion from an expert witness who have firsthand knowledge of what they are talking about? Nope.

But go on and find some military personnel's testimony of firsthand accounts that contradict Sgt. Clousing's testimony.

Edited November 6, 2006 by Steven_and_Jinky

[Ban Hammer 13,342]

Really? You've read where I've easily dismissed testimony or opinion from an expert witness who have firsthand knowledge of what they are talking about? Nope.

did you really say that with a straight face?

But go on and find some military personnel's testimony of firsthand accounts that contradict Sgt. Clousing's testimony.

should you read AND comprehend what i said previously, it was not a statement on my part that such didn't happen - just that it's more of the same - anything you can find to make the usa look bad. good job!

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Really? You've read where I've easily dismissed testimony or opinion from an expert witness who have firsthand knowledge of what they are talking about? Nope.

did you really say that with a straight face?

But go on and find some military personnel's testimony of firsthand accounts that contradict Sgt. Clousing's testimony.

should you read AND comprehend what i said previously, it was not a statement on my part that such didn't happen - just that it's more of the same - anything you can find to make the usa look bad. good job!

Come on, Charles...what a weak argument. To suggest that telling the truth is bad is outrageous for one. Secondly, just because these things are happening doesn't condemn the USA or even the military as a whole. Just as criticizing Bush's invasion of Iraq is not a condemnation of our troops. Nothing but straw man arguments in an attempt at silencing the truth. The only way to change for the better is through exposing the truth. Any reasonably thinking American reading that Sgt.'s testimony is going to be asking such questions as, "What happened to the soldier who opened fire on the boy?" Was there an investigation and were any charges brought against him? What are those in higher command doing about soldiers who routinely harass Iraqi citizens or show them undo respect (I'm not talking about the detainees - but ordinary citizens)? Those soldiers who mistreat the Iraqi's are representing me as much as you in the hearts and minds of their citizens.

And while I don't see such atrocities as a condemnation of America, I am concerned about the impressional youth of Iraq, and what their view of America is? Do they see us over their as liberators or bullies? What do you suppose his younger siblings think of America? Were there any reparations for his wrongful death? An apology to the family?

[Ban Hammer 13,342]

Come on, Charles...what a weak argument. To suggest that telling the truth is bad is outrageous for one. Secondly, just because these things are happening doesn't condemn the USA or even the military as a whole. Just as criticizing Bush's invasion of Iraq is not a condemnation of our troops. Nothing but straw man arguments in an attempt at silencing the truth. The only way to change for the better is through exposing the truth. Any reasonably thinking American reading that Sgt.'s testimony is going to be asking such questions as, "What happened to the soldier who opened fire on the boy?" Was there an investigation and were any charges brought against him? What are those in higher command doing about soldiers who routinely harass Iraqi citizens or show them undo respect (I'm not talking about the detainees - but ordinary citizens)? Those soldiers who mistreat the Iraqi's are representing me as much as you in the hearts and minds of their citizens.

And while I don't see such atrocities as a condemnation of America, I am concerned about the impressional youth of Iraq, and what their view of America is? Do they see us over their as liberators or bullies? What do you suppose his younger siblings think of America? Were there any reparations for his wrongful death? An apology to the family?

ah yes, weak arguments indeed, from vj's very own left wing! so what exactly is the point of this news article? does it serve the purpose of keeping everyone informed, or does it primarily satisfy your agenda? i'm sure many have noticed that you have a propensity to post certain articles. anti bush, anti iraq, etc etc. do you really suppose you're fooling anyone?

my comments above are a "oh ####### here we go again with another one of steven's posts about how bad america is"

too bad it still won't sink in with you

[Carol&Marc 0]

yup, shades of vietnam. where those who desert are given air time and praise.

Elizabeth de la Vega is a former federal prosecutor. Her pieces have appeared in The Nation, the L.A. Times, Salon, and Mother Jones.

Those are some real credible referals. All so left wing it makes you want to puke. Tells you where this womans head is at.

Whats really Ironic is the dems stand these poor individuals up as examples and when their done with them they throw them out with the evening trash! I love the compassion?

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Come on, Charles...what a weak argument. To suggest that telling the truth is bad is outrageous for one. Secondly, just because these things are happening doesn't condemn the USA or even the military as a whole. Just as criticizing Bush's invasion of Iraq is not a condemnation of our troops. Nothing but straw man arguments in an attempt at silencing the truth. The only way to change for the better is through exposing the truth. Any reasonably thinking American reading that Sgt.'s testimony is going to be asking such questions as, "What happened to the soldier who opened fire on the boy?" Was there an investigation and were any charges brought against him? What are those in higher command doing about soldiers who routinely harass Iraqi citizens or show them undo respect (I'm not talking about the detainees - but ordinary citizens)? Those soldiers who mistreat the Iraqi's are representing me as much as you in the hearts and minds of their citizens.

And while I don't see such atrocities as a condemnation of America, I am concerned about the impressional youth of Iraq, and what their view of America is? Do they see us over their as liberators or bullies? What do you suppose his younger siblings think of America? Were there any reparations for his wrongful death? An apology to the family?

ah yes, weak arguments indeed, from vj's very own left wing! so what exactly is the point of this news article? does it serve the purpose of keeping everyone informed, or does it primarily satisfy your agenda? i'm sure many have noticed that you have a propensity to post certain articles. anti bush, anti iraq, etc etc. do you really suppose you're fooling anyone?

my comments above are a "oh ####### here we go again with another one of steven's posts about how bad america is"

too bad it still won't sink in with you

Is that your final answer? I give you truth and all you can come with is labels. What is anti-Bush or anti -Iraq? Nothing but simplistic labels to dismiss the real issues. How about actually engaging in a real discussion without resorting to the name-calling and labelling? Otherwise, I'll start calling you anti-truth.

Edited November 6, 2006 by Steven_and_Jinky