Jump to content

78 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted

Not to take away the sacrifice of the arizonia teachers make in the article posted below Maybe here is a reason why the school system is in dire shape.

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/84115

Arizona taxpayers spend up to $1.2 billion annually to educate children of illegal immigrants

Nicole Beyer, Tribune

February 14, 2007 - 8:27PM

Children chat in Spanish between classes at Mesa’s Lindbergh Elementary School, and signs are posted in English and Spanish so parents can navigate the campus.

Fewer than 10 percent of Lindbergh students were Hispanic in 1980. Today, the figure has swelled to more than 75 percent.

But Jennifer Kill, a sixth-grade teacher at the school, said she has never asked if any of these students are illegal immigrants or the children of illegal immigrants. Her job is to teach children, not to guard the border.

“As a teacher, you get the students that come to your door,” Kill said. “You don’t concern yourself with where they’re from, what they look like.”

People who do track immigration trends estimate that 125,000 to 145,000 children of illegal immigrants attend public elementary and secondary schools in Arizona.

That figure comes from the Pew Hispanic Center in Washington, D.C., which is quick to point out that about half of these students are likely U.S. citizens born in this country.

The Pew estimate nearly equals the enrollment of the Scottsdale, Mesa and Chandler unified school districts combined.

More than one in nine Arizona students is an illegal immigrant or the child of an illegal immigrant, according to the Pew Hispanic Center.

To educate these children, school finance experts in Arizona suggest taxpayers will spend as much as $1.2 billion this year alone.

TEACHERS IN THE MIDDLE

Despite the Pew estimate, nobody knows for sure how many children of illegal immigrants attend Arizona schools.

That’s because schools such as Lindbergh aren’t allowed to ask. A 1982 U.S. Supreme Court ruling states that all children in the United States have a constitutional right to a public education regardless of their immigration status or the status of their parents.

When children enroll in public school, their parents must show proof of residency but not a Social Security number. Many families bring Mexican birth certificates and transcripts from Mexican schools.

New students who speak a language other than English at home are then tested for English proficiency.

On a recent day at Lindbergh, all 11 students who were tested for language proficiency qualified for additional state funding as “English language learners.”

Kill said she’s aware of Arizona’s debate over illegal immigration, but she refuses to speculate about anybody’s immigration status in her classroom.

“Do I think there are illegals taking time away?” she said. “Not at all. It never crosses my mind.”

She said more than half of her 30 students speak Spanish or a dialect close to Spanish, and she does “whatever it takes” to help these students succeed.

Billion-dollar debate

Depending on whom you ask, it costs between $7,720 and $8,500 each year to educate one Arizona child in the public school system.

Those numbers include federal, state and local funding for everything from teacher salaries, transportation, school nurses, meals, tutoring, special education, administration and school construction and maintenance.

The estimate also includes money the state sets aside each year for special English instruction for students not yet fluent.

All this spending infuriates opponents of illegal immigration.

“We have no obligation whatsoever to the illegal immigrant that’s here,” said Albert Rodriguez, a Hispanic U.S. citizen from Scottsdale.

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne disagrees. He says all children in this country should be educated regardless of how they got here.

“We’re not going to leave these kids out in the street and not educate them,” Horne said. “If they’re here, they have to be educated.”

But some critics say Horne and state lawmakers don’t go far enough to educate these children.

Tim Hogan, an attorney with the Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest, said the true cost of educating English learners is much more than the state allocates.

“The state needs to help kids overcome language barriers that impede them from equal participation in public schools,” said Hogan, who represents a Nogales family in a 15-year-old lawsuit that accuses the state of shortchanging English learners.

A federal judge sided with Hogan in 2000, and lawmakers responded by doubling the English immersion funding for each qualified student to $355 per year.

With 132,000 English learners in Arizona, that comes to nearly $47 million annually. But that’s still not enough, according to the judge.

“The court has said, ‘We think that’s too little,’ and we’re litigating that,” Horne said.

COLLEGE ROADBLOCK

Not all students designated as English learners are children of illegal immigrants.

Some English learners are the children of legal residents. Conversely, some fluent English speakers are illegal immigrants. Hogan’s case does not concern itself with how these numbers break down.

Jesus, a 16-year-old high school junior who declined to give his surname, acknowledges that he lacks proper documentation.

“When I got here, I started taking some English classes because I didn’t know like, anything at all,” said Jesus, who moved from Mexico in 2002.

When Jesus signed up for classes, he said he brought his Mexican birth certificate and his transcripts.

“I’m a good student,” said Jesus, who said he had the equivalent of an “A” average when he moved to Arizona.

Gabriela, a 17-year-old illegal immigrant who moved to the United States with her family when she was 2, said most illegal immigrants pay taxes and should be welcome at public schools.

“One way or another, we should be getting what we pay for,” she said.

Students like Jesus and Gabriela said they want to succeed in the U.S., and there are teachers trying to help them.

“That’s the reason we’re here,” Kill said. “So my students can graduate and they can get jobs and be productive.”

But instead of being excited for their high school graduations, Jesus and Gabriela said they are nervous.

They said they can’t afford to pay out-of-state tuition after Proposition 300 passed, and they don’t want to go back to Mexico.

Prop. 300, which voters approved in 2006, requires state colleges and universities to check Social Security numbers and charge out-of-state tuition for applicants without proper documentation.

“I see a lot of people getting their applications in,” Gabriela said. “I try to look at it and there it is … it’s like, where is your Social Security number? It’s like a slap in the face.”

Jesus called the citizenship requirement unfair.

“I’m as good as American citizens,” he said. “I’m even smarter than some of them.”

But Rodriguez, who founded an illegal immigration watchdog group in May called You Don’t Speak for Me, offers a solution.

“There is a place to go,” he said. “Get his parents to take him back where he came from.”

Gabriela’s father said he has no regrets for bringing his family to Arizona. He said in Mexico, he only made it through the third grade.

Now he wants his family members to become U.S. citizens.

“From the very start you struggle if you decide to come here without a visa,” he said.

CITIZENSHIP WITH DIPLOMAS?

Horne has a plan that would reward high school graduates with citizenship. All they would have to do is pass a test.

“If there’s a standardized test that confirms it, that the student does well and learned, I would have no objection to that,” Horne said.

But Rodriguez said Horne’s proposal would create an incentive for immigrants to break the law while there are other people waiting in line to become citizens.

“They’re doing it the right way,” Rodriguez said. “Why should these people step in the front of the line and break another

rule?”

The bottom line, Horne said, is that illegal immigration is the parents’ fault — not the children’s fault.

“Let’s fight the Supreme Court again,” Rodriguez said. “And let’s see what happens.”

If more citizens were armed, criminals would think twice about attacking them, Detroit Police Chief James Craig

Florida currently has more concealed-carry permit holders than any other state, with 1,269,021 issued as of May 14, 2014

The liberal elite ... know that the people simply cannot be trusted; that they are incapable of just and fair self-government; that left to their own devices, their society will be racist, sexist, homophobic, and inequitable -- and the liberal elite know how to fix things. They are going to help us live the good and just life, even if they have to lie to us and force us to do it. And they detest those who stand in their way."
- A Nation Of Cowards, by Jeffrey R. Snyder

Tavis Smiley: 'Black People Will Have Lost Ground in Every Single Economic Indicator' Under Obama

white-privilege.jpg?resize=318%2C318

Democrats>Socialists>Communists - Same goals, different speeds.

#DeplorableLivesMatter

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
Prop. 300, which voters approved in 2006, requires state colleges and universities to check Social Security numbers and charge out-of-state tuition for applicants without proper documentation.

“I see a lot of people getting their applications in,” Gabriela said. “I try to look at it and there it is … it’s like, where is your Social Security number? It’s like a slap in the face.”

Jesus called the citizenship requirement unfair.

“I’m as good as American citizens,” he said. “I’m even smarter than some of them.”

a slap in the face is this nut thinking she is equal or better than an american citizen when it comes to being considered for higher education. the forces of arrogance and entitlement are strong with this one.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Prop. 300, which voters approved in 2006, requires state colleges and universities to check Social Security numbers and charge out-of-state tuition for applicants without proper documentation.

“I see a lot of people getting their applications in,” Gabriela said. “I try to look at it and there it is … it’s like, where is your Social Security number? It’s like a slap in the face.”

Jesus called the citizenship requirement unfair.

“I’m as good as American citizens,” he said. “I’m even smarter than some of them.”

a slap in the face is this nut thinking she is equal or better than an american citizen when it comes to being considered for higher education. the forces of arrogance and entitlement are strong with this one.

Ain't that the truth. Case in point - my friends of my wife's migrated to the US last year - legally via the DV program. The oldest daughter will start college this fall after having graduated high school in the top 1%. Now, she doesn't qualify for in-state tuition this semester because the state says that she hasn't been a resident in FL fir the required 12 month period. I don't see them getting onto some soapbox even though they probably would have a stronger argument seeing that the only thing they failed to do right away is get a state ID for the girl - which is what the state says establishes in-state residency. For them illegal immigrants to stand there and request - no scratch that - demand better treatment than what US citizens and lawful immigrants receive is just preposterous.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
Prop. 300, which voters approved in 2006, requires state colleges and universities to check Social Security numbers and charge out-of-state tuition for applicants without proper documentation.

I am a high school guidance counselor in Florida and one of my graduating seniors had to go back to Mexico to attend a university after she graduated from high school because she was an illegal immigrant and therefore did not have a social security number to register in college. She qualified for a Florida Bright Futures scholarship to attend a public university, but could not receive it without a SS# and resident status.

02.09.2007- Met online (EverQuest 2)

07.11.2008- Met in person (Orlando)

02.14.2009- Got engaged (Toronto)

K-1

03.13.2009- NOA 1

08.24.2009- NOA 2

11.20.2009- Montreal Interview Approved!!

02.01.2010- POE @ Lewiston Bridge

02.25.2010- Applied for SS#

04.29.2010- Beach Wedding!!

AOS

05.27.2010- NOA 1 for I-131, I-485 & I-765

06.18.2010- I-485 transferred to CSC

06.21.2010- Biometrics

07.22.2010- EAD & AP approved

10.28.2010- RFE for I-485- They lost our medical!

12.09.2010- Green Card in hand!

ROC

09.14.2012- Mailed I-751 to VSC

10.26.2012- Biometrics

04.11.2013- 10 Year Green Card approved! No interview :)

8zs8cuv3suq7.png

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Prop. 300, which voters approved in 2006, requires state colleges and universities to check Social Security numbers and charge out-of-state tuition for applicants without proper documentation.

I am a high school guidance counselor in Florida and one of my graduating seniors had to go back to Mexico to attend a university after she graduated from high school because she was an illegal immigrant and therefore did not have a social security number to register in college. She qualified for a Florida Bright Futures scholarship to attend a public university, but could not receive it without a SS# and resident status.

Good. This is how it's supposed to work.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
Prop. 300, which voters approved in 2006, requires state colleges and universities to check Social Security numbers and charge out-of-state tuition for applicants without proper documentation.

I am a high school guidance counselor in Florida and one of my graduating seniors had to go back to Mexico to attend a university after she graduated from high school because she was an illegal immigrant and therefore did not have a social security number to register in college. She qualified for a Florida Bright Futures scholarship to attend a public university, but could not receive it without a SS# and resident status.

Good. This is how it's supposed to work.

exactly :thumbs:

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
If there's one thing worse than an illegal, it's an educated illegal.

from our tax dollars.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

  • 1 month later...
Posted
Not to take away the sacrifice of the arizonia teachers make in the article posted below Maybe here is a reason why the school system is in dire shape.

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/84115

Arizona taxpayers spend up to $1.2 billion annually to educate children of illegal immigrants

Nicole Beyer, Tribune

February 14, 2007 - 8:27PM

Children chat in Spanish between classes at Mesa’s Lindbergh Elementary School, and signs are posted in English and Spanish so parents can navigate the campus.

Fewer than 10 percent of Lindbergh students were Hispanic in 1980. Today, the figure has swelled to more than 75 percent.

But Jennifer Kill, a sixth-grade teacher at the school, said she has never asked if any of these students are illegal immigrants or the children of illegal immigrants. Her job is to teach children, not to guard the border.

“As a teacher, you get the students that come to your door,” Kill said. “You don’t concern yourself with where they’re from, what they look like.”

People who do track immigration trends estimate that 125,000 to 145,000 children of illegal immigrants attend public elementary and secondary schools in Arizona.

That figure comes from the Pew Hispanic Center in Washington, D.C., which is quick to point out that about half of these students are likely U.S. citizens born in this country.

The Pew estimate nearly equals the enrollment of the Scottsdale, Mesa and Chandler unified school districts combined.

More than one in nine Arizona students is an illegal immigrant or the child of an illegal immigrant, according to the Pew Hispanic Center.

To educate these children, school finance experts in Arizona suggest taxpayers will spend as much as $1.2 billion this year alone.

TEACHERS IN THE MIDDLE

Despite the Pew estimate, nobody knows for sure how many children of illegal immigrants attend Arizona schools.

That’s because schools such as Lindbergh aren’t allowed to ask. A 1982 U.S. Supreme Court ruling states that all children in the United States have a constitutional right to a public education regardless of their immigration status or the status of their parents.

When children enroll in public school, their parents must show proof of residency but not a Social Security number. Many families bring Mexican birth certificates and transcripts from Mexican schools.

New students who speak a language other than English at home are then tested for English proficiency.

On a recent day at Lindbergh, all 11 students who were tested for language proficiency qualified for additional state funding as “English language learners.”

Kill said she’s aware of Arizona’s debate over illegal immigration, but she refuses to speculate about anybody’s immigration status in her classroom.

“Do I think there are illegals taking time away?” she said. “Not at all. It never crosses my mind.”

She said more than half of her 30 students speak Spanish or a dialect close to Spanish, and she does “whatever it takes” to help these students succeed.

Billion-dollar debate

Depending on whom you ask, it costs between $7,720 and $8,500 each year to educate one Arizona child in the public school system.

Those numbers include federal, state and local funding for everything from teacher salaries, transportation, school nurses, meals, tutoring, special education, administration and school construction and maintenance.

The estimate also includes money the state sets aside each year for special English instruction for students not yet fluent.

All this spending infuriates opponents of illegal immigration.

“We have no obligation whatsoever to the illegal immigrant that’s here,” said Albert Rodriguez, a Hispanic U.S. citizen from Scottsdale.

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne disagrees. He says all children in this country should be educated regardless of how they got here.

“We’re not going to leave these kids out in the street and not educate them,” Horne said. “If they’re here, they have to be educated.”

But some critics say Horne and state lawmakers don’t go far enough to educate these children.

Tim Hogan, an attorney with the Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest, said the true cost of educating English learners is much more than the state allocates.

“The state needs to help kids overcome language barriers that impede them from equal participation in public schools,” said Hogan, who represents a Nogales family in a 15-year-old lawsuit that accuses the state of shortchanging English learners.

A federal judge sided with Hogan in 2000, and lawmakers responded by doubling the English immersion funding for each qualified student to $355 per year.

With 132,000 English learners in Arizona, that comes to nearly $47 million annually. But that’s still not enough, according to the judge.

“The court has said, ‘We think that’s too little,’ and we’re litigating that,” Horne said.

COLLEGE ROADBLOCK

Not all students designated as English learners are children of illegal immigrants.

Some English learners are the children of legal residents. Conversely, some fluent English speakers are illegal immigrants. Hogan’s case does not concern itself with how these numbers break down.

Jesus, a 16-year-old high school junior who declined to give his surname, acknowledges that he lacks proper documentation.

“When I got here, I started taking some English classes because I didn’t know like, anything at all,” said Jesus, who moved from Mexico in 2002.

When Jesus signed up for classes, he said he brought his Mexican birth certificate and his transcripts.

“I’m a good student,” said Jesus, who said he had the equivalent of an “A” average when he moved to Arizona.

Gabriela, a 17-year-old illegal immigrant who moved to the United States with her family when she was 2, said most illegal immigrants pay taxes and should be welcome at public schools.

“One way or another, we should be getting what we pay for,” she said.

Students like Jesus and Gabriela said they want to succeed in the U.S., and there are teachers trying to help them.

“That’s the reason we’re here,” Kill said. “So my students can graduate and they can get jobs and be productive.”

But instead of being excited for their high school graduations, Jesus and Gabriela said they are nervous.

They said they can’t afford to pay out-of-state tuition after Proposition 300 passed, and they don’t want to go back to Mexico.

Prop. 300, which voters approved in 2006, requires state colleges and universities to check Social Security numbers and charge out-of-state tuition for applicants without proper documentation.

“I see a lot of people getting their applications in,” Gabriela said. “I try to look at it and there it is … it’s like, where is your Social Security number? It’s like a slap in the face.”

Jesus called the citizenship requirement unfair.

“I’m as good as American citizens,” he said. “I’m even smarter than some of them.”

But Rodriguez, who founded an illegal immigration watchdog group in May called You Don’t Speak for Me, offers a solution.

“There is a place to go,” he said. “Get his parents to take him back where he came from.”

Gabriela’s father said he has no regrets for bringing his family to Arizona. He said in Mexico, he only made it through the third grade.

Now he wants his family members to become U.S. citizens.

“From the very start you struggle if you decide to come here without a visa,” he said.

CITIZENSHIP WITH DIPLOMAS?

Horne has a plan that would reward high school graduates with citizenship. All they would have to do is pass a test.

“If there’s a standardized test that confirms it, that the student does well and learned, I would have no objection to that,” Horne said.

But Rodriguez said Horne’s proposal would create an incentive for immigrants to break the law while there are other people waiting in line to become citizens.

“They’re doing it the right way,” Rodriguez said. “Why should these people step in the front of the line and break another

rule?”

The bottom line, Horne said, is that illegal immigration is the parents’ fault — not the children’s fault.

“Let’s fight the Supreme Court again,” Rodriguez said. “And let’s see what happens.”

You can thank our local and federal government, who has no balls to enforce the laws that are already in-place.

DHS Allowing Illegal Aliens to Remain in Workforce; DOL Helping Them Improve Working Conditions

Last week, two media reports revealed that the Obama Administration is (1) failing to deport illegal workers, and (2) at the same time, working to entrench illegal aliens as part of the U.S. labor force by having the U.S. Department of Labor work with the Mexican government "to protect Mexican workers regardless of their legal status." (The Sacramento Bee, September 1, 2009).

Last week, the impact of Homeland Security's new policy on worksite enforcement became readily apparent when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) refused to say whether it would deport 1,500 factory workers who had been fired "because they were unable to prove their immigration status or fix problems with their employment records." (Los Angeles Times, September 3, 2009). Two months ago, American Apparel Inc. — a Los Angeles clothing manufacturer and retailer well-known for its support for amnesty — announced that an ICE inspection had found that about 1,600 of its workers appeared to be illegal. According to the Los Angeles Times, ICE spokeswoman Virginia Kice "declined to speculate on what would happen to illegal workers once they left a company." Kice told the Times: "The focus is on the employer…on ensuring that businesses employ a legal workforce. Then again, if someone is in this country in violation of immigration laws, they are subject to enforcement action." (Id.).

Kice's refusal to confirm that ICE would deport any illegal aliens working at American Apparel Inc. suggests that the Obama Administration is willing to allow illegal aliens discovered in the course of a worksite enforcement operation to re-enter the workforce. This is especially troubling in light of a report released last week by The Sacramento Bee indicating that the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is working with "Mexican consulates across the United States as part of a binational campaign, endorsed by Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis, to protect Mexican workers regardless of their legal status." (The Sacramento Bee, September 1, 2009). According to The Bee, "tate and federal labor officials joined immigrant rights advocates and union representatives" last Monday at Sacramento's Mexican Consulate "to address work-related injuries, sexual harassment, salary issues and working conditions." (Id.).

Last week's events, however, are only the latest in a series indicating that the Obama Administration is not serious about enforcing America's immigration laws. In March, it was revealed that DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano had not only ordered the release of 27 illegal aliens who had been arrested as part of an ICE worksite enforcement investigation in Bellingham, Washington, but that DHS has also given them work authorization. (See FAIR's Legislative Update, April 6, 2009). Furthermore, on March 29, an anonymous DHS official told The Washington Post that Napolitano had delayed a series of worksite enforcement operations. (The Washington Post, March 29, 2009).

The administration's refusal to enforce immigration law against illegal alien workers found as the result of ICE worksite enforcement operations may be part of an enforcement strategy that focuses on the identification and removal of "criminal" aliens only. In fact, the administration has made announcements concerning the Secure Communities program (See FAIR's Legislative Update, May 26, 2009); the 287(g) program (See FAIR's Legislative Update, July 13, 2009); and the Fugitive Operations program (See FAIR's Legislative Update, August 24, 2009) indicating that they intend to abandon immigration enforcement in all but the most serious criminal cases.

'PAU' both wife and daughter in the U.S. 08/25/2009

Daughter's' CRBA Manila Embassy 08/07/2008 dual citizenship

http://crbausembassy....wordpress.com/

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted

It just shows you only in America can this utter freaking nonsense be allowed to even be thought of and sadly carried out at times! Any other country having illegals in it or protesting in streets is going to expunge them immediately and deadly. Just a total mess our Federal Government has done to us all in the USA. And they think they can fix our economy with all these czars of Ovomit and his fiscal stimulus boondooggle and now this health care nonsense! We are screwed. :wacko:

Not to take away the sacrifice of the arizonia teachers make in the article posted below Maybe here is a reason why the school system is in dire shape.

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/84115

Arizona taxpayers spend up to $1.2 billion annually to educate children of illegal immigrants

Nicole Beyer, Tribune

February 14, 2007 - 8:27PM

Children chat in Spanish between classes at Mesa’s Lindbergh Elementary School, and signs are posted in English and Spanish so parents can navigate the campus.

Fewer than 10 percent of Lindbergh students were Hispanic in 1980. Today, the figure has swelled to more than 75 percent.

But Jennifer Kill, a sixth-grade teacher at the school, said she has never asked if any of these students are illegal immigrants or the children of illegal immigrants. Her job is to teach children, not to guard the border.

“As a teacher, you get the students that come to your door,” Kill said. “You don’t concern yourself with where they’re from, what they look like.”

People who do track immigration trends estimate that 125,000 to 145,000 children of illegal immigrants attend public elementary and secondary schools in Arizona.

That figure comes from the Pew Hispanic Center in Washington, D.C., which is quick to point out that about half of these students are likely U.S. citizens born in this country.

The Pew estimate nearly equals the enrollment of the Scottsdale, Mesa and Chandler unified school districts combined.

More than one in nine Arizona students is an illegal immigrant or the child of an illegal immigrant, according to the Pew Hispanic Center.

To educate these children, school finance experts in Arizona suggest taxpayers will spend as much as $1.2 billion this year alone.

TEACHERS IN THE MIDDLE

Despite the Pew estimate, nobody knows for sure how many children of illegal immigrants attend Arizona schools.

That’s because schools such as Lindbergh aren’t allowed to ask. A 1982 U.S. Supreme Court ruling states that all children in the United States have a constitutional right to a public education regardless of their immigration status or the status of their parents.

When children enroll in public school, their parents must show proof of residency but not a Social Security number. Many families bring Mexican birth certificates and transcripts from Mexican schools.

New students who speak a language other than English at home are then tested for English proficiency.

On a recent day at Lindbergh, all 11 students who were tested for language proficiency qualified for additional state funding as “English language learners.”

Kill said she’s aware of Arizona’s debate over illegal immigration, but she refuses to speculate about anybody’s immigration status in her classroom.

“Do I think there are illegals taking time away?” she said. “Not at all. It never crosses my mind.”

She said more than half of her 30 students speak Spanish or a dialect close to Spanish, and she does “whatever it takes” to help these students succeed.

Billion-dollar debate

Depending on whom you ask, it costs between $7,720 and $8,500 each year to educate one Arizona child in the public school system.

Those numbers include federal, state and local funding for everything from teacher salaries, transportation, school nurses, meals, tutoring, special education, administration and school construction and maintenance.

The estimate also includes money the state sets aside each year for special English instruction for students not yet fluent.

All this spending infuriates opponents of illegal immigration.

“We have no obligation whatsoever to the illegal immigrant that’s here,” said Albert Rodriguez, a Hispanic U.S. citizen from Scottsdale.

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne disagrees. He says all children in this country should be educated regardless of how they got here.

“We’re not going to leave these kids out in the street and not educate them,” Horne said. “If they’re here, they have to be educated.”

But some critics say Horne and state lawmakers don’t go far enough to educate these children.

Tim Hogan, an attorney with the Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest, said the true cost of educating English learners is much more than the state allocates.

“The state needs to help kids overcome language barriers that impede them from equal participation in public schools,” said Hogan, who represents a Nogales family in a 15-year-old lawsuit that accuses the state of shortchanging English learners.

A federal judge sided with Hogan in 2000, and lawmakers responded by doubling the English immersion funding for each qualified student to $355 per year.

With 132,000 English learners in Arizona, that comes to nearly $47 million annually. But that’s still not enough, according to the judge.

“The court has said, ‘We think that’s too little,’ and we’re litigating that,” Horne said.

COLLEGE ROADBLOCK

Not all students designated as English learners are children of illegal immigrants.

Some English learners are the children of legal residents. Conversely, some fluent English speakers are illegal immigrants. Hogan’s case does not concern itself with how these numbers break down.

Jesus, a 16-year-old high school junior who declined to give his surname, acknowledges that he lacks proper documentation.

“When I got here, I started taking some English classes because I didn’t know like, anything at all,” said Jesus, who moved from Mexico in 2002.

When Jesus signed up for classes, he said he brought his Mexican birth certificate and his transcripts.

“I’m a good student,” said Jesus, who said he had the equivalent of an “A” average when he moved to Arizona.

Gabriela, a 17-year-old illegal immigrant who moved to the United States with her family when she was 2, said most illegal immigrants pay taxes and should be welcome at public schools.

“One way or another, we should be getting what we pay for,” she said.

Students like Jesus and Gabriela said they want to succeed in the U.S., and there are teachers trying to help them.

“That’s the reason we’re here,” Kill said. “So my students can graduate and they can get jobs and be productive.”

But instead of being excited for their high school graduations, Jesus and Gabriela said they are nervous.

They said they can’t afford to pay out-of-state tuition after Proposition 300 passed, and they don’t want to go back to Mexico.

Prop. 300, which voters approved in 2006, requires state colleges and universities to check Social Security numbers and charge out-of-state tuition for applicants without proper documentation.

“I see a lot of people getting their applications in,” Gabriela said. “I try to look at it and there it is … it’s like, where is your Social Security number? It’s like a slap in the face.”

Jesus called the citizenship requirement unfair.

“I’m as good as American citizens,” he said. “I’m even smarter than some of them.”

But Rodriguez, who founded an illegal immigration watchdog group in May called You Don’t Speak for Me, offers a solution.

“There is a place to go,” he said. “Get his parents to take him back where he came from.”

Gabriela’s father said he has no regrets for bringing his family to Arizona. He said in Mexico, he only made it through the third grade.

Now he wants his family members to become U.S. citizens.

“From the very start you struggle if you decide to come here without a visa,” he said.

CITIZENSHIP WITH DIPLOMAS?

Horne has a plan that would reward high school graduates with citizenship. All they would have to do is pass a test.

“If there’s a standardized test that confirms it, that the student does well and learned, I would have no objection to that,” Horne said.

But Rodriguez said Horne’s proposal would create an incentive for immigrants to break the law while there are other people waiting in line to become citizens.

“They’re doing it the right way,” Rodriguez said. “Why should these people step in the front of the line and break another

rule?”

The bottom line, Horne said, is that illegal immigration is the parents’ fault — not the children’s fault.

“Let’s fight the Supreme Court again,” Rodriguez said. “And let’s see what happens.”

Posted

This is disgraceful. I hope non of the federal tax I pay is going to this sort of idiocy.

We have American kids (black, white and even Hispanic) that are in desperate need of good quality schools and teachers yet one state alone is spending over a billion to educate the kids of foreign nationals who are not even permitted to be here.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...