Jump to content
Taye500

REASON FOR IMBRA ???

 Share

74 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

For anybody interested in the reason for IMBRA can watch American Justice at A&E at 0100 am EST today. There is a case about mail order bride.

I-129f sent-- 05-26-2006

NOA1 - 06-08-2006

Rfe recieved - 06-30-2006

rfe sent - 06-30-2006

NOA2 - 07-31-2006

NVC received - 08-03-2006

NOA2 recieved in the mail: 08-04-2006

NVC sent : 08-04-2006

NVC letter recieved: 08-10-2006

Embassy confirmed: 08-11-2006

interview date: 11-09-2006

Visa approved : 11-09-2006

Visa recieved : 11-15-200

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I watched that show... if it's the one about Anastasia from Kyrgyzstan, I don't know if IMBRA would have helped her.

She married a man and went to Washington State, was unhappy, and returned home. He flew there to convince her and her family that everything was OK. Obviously, it wasn't, and she returned with him anyway. Upon arrival back in Washington, he killed her.

IMBRA would've prevented him from bringing her to the US in the first place, but it wouldn't have stopped her from going back a second time. When women are willing (even pressured by their family) to marry men whom they don't even know from "rich" countries, there's always going to be a chance, IMBRA or no IMBRA, that they will be abused once here.

Русский форум член.

Ensure your beneficiary makes and brings with them to the States a copy of the DS-3025 (vaccination form)

If the government is going to force me to exercise my "right" to health care, then they better start requiring people to exercise their Right to Bear Arms. - "Where's my public option rifle?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Albania
Timeline
I watched that show... if it's the one about Anastasia from Kyrgyzstan, I don't know if IMBRA would have helped her.

She married a man and went to Washington State, was unhappy, and returned home. He flew there to convince her and her family that everything was OK. Obviously, it wasn't, and she returned with him anyway. Upon arrival back in Washington, he killed her.

IMBRA would've prevented him from bringing her to the US in the first place, but it wouldn't have stopped her from going back a second time. When women are willing (even pressured by their family) to marry men whom they don't even know from "rich" countries, there's always going to be a chance, IMBRA or no IMBRA, that they will be abused once here.

I didn't see the show, but given your summary, it also seems like the IMBRA may not have kept her from coming here in the first place either -- did the husband have a prior criminal record? Even if he did, she still could have chosen to chance it and marry him anyways. Given the fact that she returned to him after living with him unhappily for a while, she probably would have chosen to get married anyway.

It's terrible what happened to her and stories like this probably are why they drafted the IMBRA, even though I remain unconvinced about what kind of positive impact the law will ultimately have, since I feel MANY foreign fiancees/fiances would choose to marry despite the gov't's warnings about the future spouse. I certainly hope I'm wrong though and all this extra waiting and headache so many VJers are facing isn't all for nothing!

-- Karen

Edited by Karen_L

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

7/27/2006: Arrival in NYC! -- I-94/EAD stamp in passport

8/08/2006: Applied for Social Security Card

8/18/2006: Social Security Card arrives

8/25/2006: WEDDING!

AOS...

9/11/2006: Appointment with Civil Surgeon for vaccination supplement

9/18/2006: Mailed AOS and renewal EAD applications to Chicago

10/2/2006: NOA1's for AOS and EAD applications

10/13/2006: Biometrics taken

10/14/2006: NOA -- case transferred to CSC

10/30/2006: AOS approved without interview, greencard will be sent! :)

11/04/2006: Greencard arrives in the mail! :-D

... No more USCIS for two whole years! ...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
I watched that show... if it's the one about Anastasia from Kyrgyzstan, I don't know if IMBRA would have helped her.

She married a man and went to Washington State, was unhappy, and returned home. He flew there to convince her and her family that everything was OK. Obviously, it wasn't, and she returned with him anyway. Upon arrival back in Washington, he killed her.

IMBRA would've prevented him from bringing her to the US in the first place, but it wouldn't have stopped her from going back a second time. When women are willing (even pressured by their family) to marry men whom they don't even know from "rich" countries, there's always going to be a chance, IMBRA or no IMBRA, that they will be abused once here.

But should it be a problem for the U.S.? I'd be curious to know how many women who immigrated to America as foreign brides ended up being victims of abuse and consequently taken care of by the taxpayer (affidavit of support is important for obvious reasons). I'm not griping about taking care of them as a taxpayer (they are the victims), but I'd rather see we do a better job of screening the kind of men who are bringing foreign brides here, especially if all it means is that we take a look at his criminal record to see if he has a history of domestic violence. Heck, we should be doing that for anyone wanting to marry, foreign or domestic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Would IMBRA have saved Anastasia King's life? We cannot possibly know. But had IMBRA been in effect, she would have known that her husband, Idle King, had previously gotten a mail order bride, and that she had taken out multiple restraining orders against him due to his violent tendencies. Would Anastasia have acted on that information? Who knows. But because she was never told about his past K-1 petition and his abuse history, she didn't even have the chance to consider it.

Before he killed Anastasia, he began efforts to find a third mail order bride -- he wanted to get rid of Anastasia, he just didn't want to have to pay to divorce her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
I'd be curious to know how many women who immigrated to America as foreign brides ended up being victims of abuse and consequently taken care of by the taxpayer

I so badly want to give this a rest, but I can't resist...

Do you believe this number would be any different then non-foreign brides? I highly doubt it.

I've seen that show before, plus I lived in the area near where the crime was commited, so I saw it on the news quite often. At the time I had no knowledge of the K1 process and how that worked, so I was outraged like anyone else. I thought it was a matter of a few papers and wait a few weeks the way things were portrayed. Of course it is not.

What got me was how fake their marriage seemed all along. How was anyone fooled into thinking that was not a sham marriage? And in fairness, Anastasia was using her husband for access to the U of W for her medical training. You could tell she did not want to be close to him. That is not a trait of Kyrgystan women. Ask almaty2004.

I strongly believe IMBRA would not have helped Anastasia. Mr. King could have easily used yahoo personals, adult friend finder, or one of many other internet dating sites to find an American victim. There are also crimes of passion in America angainst Americans, how do you stop these? Not allow people to have passion?

K1 Visa Process long ago and far away...

02/09/06 - NOA1 date

12/17/06 - Married!

AOS Process a fading memory...

01/31/07 - Mailed AOS/EAD package for Olga and Anya

06/01/07 - Green card arrived in mail

Removing Conditions

03/02/09 - Mailed I-751 package (CSC)

03/06/09 - Check cashed

03/10/09 - Recieved Olga's NOA1

03/28/09 - Olga did biometrics

05/11/09 - Anya recieved NOA1 (took a call to USCIS to take care of it, oddly, they were helpful)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Taiwan
Timeline

There is another famous case which is documented on CandleForLove. A chinese women and her daughter were brought to the US and after a few months the women caught her husband molesting her daughter. He was arrested and it turned out he was a convicted child molestor so he will be in jail for life. IMBRA was signed into law to protect a spouse brought to the US from an abusive USC, whether it be husband or an abusive wife.

I'd be curious to know how many women who immigrated to America as foreign brides ended up being victims of abuse and consequently taken care of by the taxpayer

I so badly want to give this a rest, but I can't resist...

Do you believe this number would be any different then non-foreign brides? I highly doubt it.

I've seen that show before, plus I lived in the area near where the crime was commited, so I saw it on the news quite often. At the time I had no knowledge of the K1 process and how that worked, so I was outraged like anyone else. I thought it was a matter of a few papers and wait a few weeks the way things were portrayed. Of course it is not.

What got me was how fake their marriage seemed all along. How was anyone fooled into thinking that was not a sham marriage? And in fairness, Anastasia was using her husband for access to the U of W for her medical training. You could tell she did not want to be close to him. That is not a trait of Kyrgystan women. Ask almaty2004.

I strongly believe IMBRA would not have helped Anastasia. Mr. King could have easily used yahoo personals, adult friend finder, or one of many other internet dating sites to find an American victim. There are also crimes of passion in America angainst Americans, how do you stop these? Not allow people to have passion?

I-130...CR-1

02/27/06 Filed CR-1, I-130 thru TSC

07/26/06 NVC assigns case #, Wife e-mails choice of agent to NVC

10/10/06 Receive, complete and submit I-864 and DS-230

04/02/07 Back to Taiwan for visit and Interview

04/06/07 Received CR-1 visa

04/10/07 POE through Detroit

04/30/07 2 Year Green Card Received

Lifting Conditions

01/10/09 File I-751 at VSC

06/24/09 Received 10 year GC

Citizenship

07/27/10 Filing Date for N-400

08/03/10 Check cashed - as of 8/26 never received NOA so made InfoPass

08/31/10 InfoPass for Biometrics

11/10/10 Interview Date, Passed

02/18/11 Scheduled oath ceremony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Egypt
Timeline

It looks like this case was one of those cited when IMBRA was signed into law

"These common sense safeguards will protect women like Anastasia King and Susanna Blackwell, whose lives could have been saved if these protections had been in place when they needed them," Larsen said.

"These women didn't know what was legal. They were not on an equal playing field when they got here," said Larsen spokeswoman Abbey Levenshus in a telephone interview from Washington, D.C.

But something from that article makes me curious

The provision also would end "the wife lottery," Levenshus said.

"Until this law, it was perfectly OK to apply for as many foreign-fiancee visas as you wanted at one particular time. ... and whichever one is approved first is the winner," she said.

Now, American men can only apply for one foreign-fiancee visa at a time.

"We're not trying to stop you from having a second chance" if things don't work out, Levenshus said. "We just don't want you to have six chances at the same time."

She noted that King "already had another fiancee visa in the works when he murdered Anastasia."

Is that true??

10/14/05 - married AbuS in the US lovehusband.gif

02/23/08 - Filed for removal of conditions.

Sometime in 2008 - Received 10 year GC. Almost done with USCIS for life inshaAllah! Huzzah!

12/07/08 - Adopted the fuzzy feline love of my life, my Squeaky baby th_catcrazy.gif

02/23/09 - Apply for citizenship

06/15/09 - Citizenship interview

07/15/09 - Citizenship ceremony. Alhamdulilah, the US now has another american muslim!

irhal.jpg

online rihla - on the path of the Beloved with a fat cat as a copilot

These comments, information and photos may not be reused, reposted, or republished anywhere without express written permission from UmmSqueakster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
There is another famous case which is documented on CandleForLove. A chinese women and her daughter were brought to the US and after a few months the women caught her husband molesting her daughter. He was arrested and it turned out he was a convicted child molestor so he will be in jail for life. IMBRA was signed into law to protect a spouse brought to the US from an abusive USC, whether it be husband or an abusive wife.

I'd be curious to know how many women who immigrated to America as foreign brides ended up being victims of abuse and consequently taken care of by the taxpayer

I so badly want to give this a rest, but I can't resist...

Do you believe this number would be any different then non-foreign brides? I highly doubt it.

I've seen that show before, plus I lived in the area near where the crime was commited, so I saw it on the news quite often. At the time I had no knowledge of the K1 process and how that worked, so I was outraged like anyone else. I thought it was a matter of a few papers and wait a few weeks the way things were portrayed. Of course it is not.

What got me was how fake their marriage seemed all along. How was anyone fooled into thinking that was not a sham marriage? And in fairness, Anastasia was using her husband for access to the U of W for her medical training. You could tell she did not want to be close to him. That is not a trait of Kyrgystan women. Ask almaty2004.

I strongly believe IMBRA would not have helped Anastasia. Mr. King could have easily used yahoo personals, adult friend finder, or one of many other internet dating sites to find an American victim. There are also crimes of passion in America angainst Americans, how do you stop these? Not allow people to have passion?

What is in place to protect American women and children from this man? Why aren't we making it a requirement for men to reveal their criminal history before they recieve a fellow Americans contact information? Wouldn't that save Americans?

K1 Visa Process long ago and far away...

02/09/06 - NOA1 date

12/17/06 - Married!

AOS Process a fading memory...

01/31/07 - Mailed AOS/EAD package for Olga and Anya

06/01/07 - Green card arrived in mail

Removing Conditions

03/02/09 - Mailed I-751 package (CSC)

03/06/09 - Check cashed

03/10/09 - Recieved Olga's NOA1

03/28/09 - Olga did biometrics

05/11/09 - Anya recieved NOA1 (took a call to USCIS to take care of it, oddly, they were helpful)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
I'd be curious to know how many women who immigrated to America as foreign brides ended up being victims of abuse and consequently taken care of by the taxpayer (affidavit of support is important for obvious reasons). I'm not griping about taking care of them as a taxpayer (they are the victims), but I'd rather see we do a better job of screening the kind of men who are bringing foreign brides here, especially if all it means is that we take a look at his criminal record to see if he has a history of domestic violence. Heck, we should be doing that for anyone wanting to marry, foreign or domestic.

According to USCIS statistics, from the time that VAWA made it possible in 1996 for foreign spouses to leave their abuser and self-petition for their own immigration status through March 2005, approximately 38,000 I-360 applications were filed, 30,672 were approved, and approximately 7200 were denied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Morocco
Timeline

Interesting comments...some valid points are made here...have never seen the show...this law is a controversial one and stirs a lot of heated arguments...both pro and con...I am one of the lucky ones that was not affected by it and sometimes I wonder if I would truly go insane if further delays were to affect our application....I consider myself one of the lucky ones who got processed in under 5 months and my heart goes out to all the couples that are enduring much longer waiting time...IMBRA has been enacted to protect the beneficiary...and I think that taking under consideration the brief description of Anastasia King's case this law would have raised some valid questions about Mr. King's activities...Would it prevent the tragedy? That we will never know ...right now that the law is in full effect I hope that something good will come out of it...for now it is just a lot of delays and a lot of frustration...

______________________________________________________________

Citizenship (N-400)

09/15/2009 - Application mailed to Texas Lockbox

09/17/2009 - Delivered to the Lockbox

09/21/2009 - Check cashed

09/24/2009 - NOA dated 9/18/09

09/26/2009 - RFE mailed out dated 9/25 (biometrics notice)

10/14/2009 - Biometrics completed

01/01/2010 - finally an update - awaiting interview letter

02/08/2010 - interview (Garden City, NY) -- PASSED

03/03/2010 - Oath Ceremony in Brooklyn

03/13/2010 - U.S. Passport in hand

DONE!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Argentina
Timeline

What about American brides? There is no such law for americans marrying americans. What if married my ex boyfriend from college and he ended up murdering me because I broke up with him? I also would have never known he had a criminal record. You can't exactly do a google search on someone's background.

Maybe they should create this law for EVERYONE.

I don't think this is about protecting foreigners at all. This is just another way to make it even harder for people to come to the US.

AOS

01-29-07 - marriage

02-07-07 - AOS package mailed to Chicago

02-09-07 - AOS package delivered

02-13-07 - NOA1 date

02-21-07 - Biometrics letter

02-24-07 - NOA1 received

03-01-07 - Biometrics taken

03-15-07 - Transferred to The Sucky/Slow Center (TSC)... to "speed up" processing.

03-17-07 - Transferred notice e-mail

03-20-07 - Received TSC transfer letter

03-21-07 - application pending at TSC e-mail.

05-14-07 - Misinfopass appt. COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME.

06-05-07 - I-131 e-filed

06-11-07 - AP NOA1

07-09-07 - Received weird looking letter for AP, but online status hasn't changed

Last Touch - AOS 3/24, AP 7/03

aW1hZ2UucGhwPzQ2JkkrY291bGQraGF2ZStnb3R0ZW4rYStEZWxsJjAwMDAwMCYwMDAwMDAmMTImMTAmYyYwJjcmMiYyMDA3JjcmMCY0Mzc4NDcwMDExODEyMjE5ODguJw==.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

I hate the fact that I have to wait longer to be with Anna. She is in a stressful job that will eventually have an affect on her health, if it has not already. We truly enjoy one anothers company, we are crazy about one another. We miss each other terribly and I want to be with her so badly it hurts.

I am also for any pocess that helps safe guard the person who is coming from another country to be with someone they have come to love. I know the process if not full proof and I know that it might not save everyone but if it saves just one person I will not have waited in vein. Could the process be better yes, but I doubt any of the people writing the law have actually been through what each of us is going through or they would have figured out a way to improve the process without adding time to it.

I personally will set up a checking account as well as a saftey deposit box in Anna's name (and only her name) so that she will have access to enough money and her passport to leave me if things become unbearable for her. I don't want her to ever feel trapped or that she does not have any choices.

Paul/Anna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

I'd be curious to know how many women who immigrated to America as foreign brides ended up being victims of abuse and consequently taken care of by the taxpayer

I so badly want to give this a rest, but I can't resist...

Do you believe this number would be any different then non-foreign brides? I highly doubt it.

I've seen that show before, plus I lived in the area near where the crime was commited, so I saw it on the news quite often. At the time I had no knowledge of the K1 process and how that worked, so I was outraged like anyone else. I thought it was a matter of a few papers and wait a few weeks the way things were portrayed. Of course it is not.

What got me was how fake their marriage seemed all along. How was anyone fooled into thinking that was not a sham marriage? And in fairness, Anastasia was using her husband for access to the U of W for her medical training. You could tell she did not want to be close to him. That is not a trait of Kyrgystan women. Ask almaty2004.

I strongly believe IMBRA would not have helped Anastasia. Mr. King could have easily used yahoo personals, adult friend finder, or one of many other internet dating sites to find an American victim. There are also crimes of passion in America angainst Americans, how do you stop these? Not allow people to have passion?

I think the wrong argument was made. It's speculative whether or not IMBRA would have helped Anastasia. That really shouldn't be the focus. It would have made her better informed and that to me makes logical sense. Laws and regulations will never 'fix' the problem, but that doesn't negate the necessity to have them.

Look at this way. Suppose you wanted to start you're own domestic matchmaking service. You'd want clientele who will build a good reputation for you. You'd do your best to screen the type of people using your service as your business depends on that. However, with international agencies, there is no governing body that can regulate it. The less scrupulous agencies know that full well and exploit both sides (American and foreigner) for the sake of profit. IMBRA can't regulate those agencies, but it can affect the business practices by putting a stop to people with domestic violence histories from bringing over foreign women. The agencies will have to begin to start screening their applicants or face losing business when their visa success rate tanks.

Edited by StevenJinky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...