Jump to content
w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r

Mobile phones more dangerous than smoking or asbestor

 Share

16 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline

Mobile phones could kill far more people than smoking or asbestos, a study by an award-winning cancer expert has concluded. He says people should avoid using them wherever possible and that governments and the mobile phone industry must take "immediate steps" to reduce exposure to their radiation.

The study, by Dr Vini Khurana, is the most devastating indictment yet published of the health risks.

...

Using handsets for 10 years or more can double the risk of brain cancer. Cancers take at least a decade to develop, invalidating official safety assurances based on earlier studies which included few, if any, people who had used the phones for that long.

Earlier this year, the French government warned against the use of mobile phones, especially by children. Germany also advises its people to minimise handset use, and the European Environment Agency has called for exposures to be reduced.

Professor Khurana – a top neurosurgeon who has received 14 awards over the past 16 years, has published more than three dozen scientific papers – reviewed more than 100 studies on the effects of mobile phones.

...

The Mobile Operators Association dismissed Khurana's study as "a selective discussion of scientific literature by one individual". It believes he "does not present a balanced analysis" of the published science, and "reaches opposite conclusions to the WHO and more than 30 other independent expert scientific reviews".

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/he...2602.html?r=RSS

Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Mobile phones could kill far more people than smoking or asbestos, a study by an award-winning cancer expert has concluded. He says people should avoid using them wherever possible and that governments and the mobile phone industry must take "immediate steps" to reduce exposure to their radiation.

The study, by Dr Vini Khurana, is the most devastating indictment yet published of the health risks.

...

Using handsets for 10 years or more can double the risk of brain cancer. Cancers take at least a decade to develop, invalidating official safety assurances based on earlier studies which included few, if any, people who had used the phones for that long.

Earlier this year, the French government warned against the use of mobile phones, especially by children. Germany also advises its people to minimise handset use, and the European Environment Agency has called for exposures to be reduced.

Professor Khurana – a top neurosurgeon who has received 14 awards over the past 16 years, has published more than three dozen scientific papers – reviewed more than 100 studies on the effects of mobile phones.

...

The Mobile Operators Association dismissed Khurana's study as "a selective discussion of scientific literature by one individual". It believes he "does not present a balanced analysis" of the published science, and "reaches opposite conclusions to the WHO and more than 30 other independent expert scientific reviews".

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/he...2602.html?r=RSS

That'll go down well in the UK. A few years ago there was a small panic when it was discovered that Mobile phone antennas were being placed near people's houses, inside service station price towers - and mounted on the walls and McDonalds restaurants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline

now that i'm aware of the dangers of a cell phone, i'm sending one to my ex wife.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another gazillion dollar industry that will fight tooth and nail to prevent anyone finding out exactly how dangerous it might prove to be. I don't know if it's true or not but even if it wasn't, the obsession with using mobile phones is a curious phenomena. Maybe the mobile phone is the new smoking?

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Scotland
Timeline

There IS actually a study and hypothesis that cell phone useage is the new smoking!

Apparently rates of smoking has dropped (don't know how much, but I guess enough to notice) amongst young people in the past few years. Some dudes wanted to try to figure out why and they concluded that the drop happened around the same time that cellphones became so popular.

The theory is that smoking and cell phones both are status symbols, so make teenagers and young people you know...inherently awesome. Thus the attraction.

I never use a cellphone really so I'm not worried about the brain cancer thing but I don't want everyone to suddenly break out with it in a decade, geez :( And I anticipate I'll have to start using one pretty soon, and I was just gonna get a cellphone and skip having a home phone (who needs it these days?) to save money, so this is all bad news...

I really, really don't want the day to come that I have a nine year old that starts screaming that he/she "NEEDS" a cellphone and deal with all that 'but everyone else has one!' stuff. Ugh :( I hope my kids are cool.

Summer 2001 - met my Scottish boy

December 18th, 2007 - proposal in Madrid's Botanical Gardens with a duck standing behind him going 'food?'

January 18th, 2008 - I-129F sent to VSC

January 31st, 2008 - received NOA1, issued Jan. 24 :)

February 24th, 2008 - NOA2; omgwtfbbqlolz

February 29th, 2008 - NVC letter sent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline

Funny... I just had this discussion with my fiancée a few weeks back. "Jeffery, will you buy son a phone in America? Some boys have them in Russia. He wants too." No, dear, a 9 year old does not need a phone! My own 12 year old son does not have one either. We'll discuss this again when he gets into high school.

There IS actually a study and hypothesis that cell phone useage is the new smoking!

Apparently rates of smoking has dropped (don't know how much, but I guess enough to notice) amongst young people in the past few years. Some dudes wanted to try to figure out why and they concluded that the drop happened around the same time that cellphones became so popular.

The theory is that smoking and cell phones both are status symbols, so make teenagers and young people you know...inherently awesome. Thus the attraction.

I never use a cellphone really so I'm not worried about the brain cancer thing but I don't want everyone to suddenly break out with it in a decade, geez :( And I anticipate I'll have to start using one pretty soon, and I was just gonna get a cellphone and skip having a home phone (who needs it these days?) to save money, so this is all bad news...

I really, really don't want the day to come that I have a nine year old that starts screaming that he/she "NEEDS" a cellphone and deal with all that 'but everyone else has one!' stuff. Ugh :( I hope my kids are cool.

Jeffery AND Alla.

0 kilometers physically separates us!

K-1 Visa Granted... Wednesday, 21 May 2008

Alla ARRIVED to America... Wednesday, 12 November 2008

russia_a.gif Алла и Джеффри USA_a.gif

AllaAndJeffery.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline

My wife has been telling me this sort of stuff for a long time. It's hard to know what's "fact" and what isn't, since new studies are constantly coming out, stating one thing as "true" and then next year, something else is instead. I don't think anyone really knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: England
Timeline

Glad I don't feel the need to be obsessively attached to one like so many people I see....

Co-Founder of VJ Fluffy Kitty Posse -
avatar.jpg

31 Dec 2003 MARRIED
26 Jan 2004 Filed I130; 23 May 2005 Received Visa
30 Jun 2005 Arrived at Chicago POE
02 Apr 2007 Filed I751; 22 May 2008 Received 10-yr green card
14 Jul 2012 Citizenship Oath Ceremony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
I am going to divorce Alex because she's been using her cellphone behind my back...

oooooooooo

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
I am going to divorce Alex because she's been using her cellphone behind my back...

oooooooooo

We built a relationship based on no mobile comunication and I have been betrayed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Another gazillion dollar industry that will fight tooth and nail to prevent anyone finding out exactly how dangerous it might prove to be. I don't know if it's true or not but even if it wasn't, the obsession with using mobile phones is a curious phenomena. Maybe the mobile phone is the new smoking?

I dunno - there's been plenty of research to suggest that there are no long term health effects, but who knows.

I'd be more worried about a CJD epidemic than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talk on speakerphone and the problem is solved. The other thing is that there are a range of factors such as the frequency the phone works on as well as the transmission method. Any phone that works in the lower frequencies such as Verizon is probably much safer as the phone does not require anywhere near as much power to transmit the call.

You can also get cell phones where the antenna is not near you brain. I know the Sprint A900 has an antenna towards the bottom of the phone; near you mouth. Ideally everyone should be looking at the SAR rating when buying a cell phone anyway. It is in the manual..

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...