Dems commenting on Obama

[kaydee457 13]

Interesting.....

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Kaydee, if you like that kind of entertainment, you should watch the infomercials late at night on TV with the fake audience and speakers. It's a riot.

...this is all you can up with?

[one...two...tree 2,762]

...speaking of schmucks being smitten by Obama...

McCain Adviser Won't Fight Obama

ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports: A top adviser to John McCain said Wednesday that he will step down from the Arizona senator's presidential campaign if the presumed GOP nominee faces Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., in the general election.

"I would simply be uncomfortable being in a campaign that would be inevitably attacking Barack Obama," said McCain adviser Mark McKinnon in an interview with NPR's "All Things Considered." "I think it would be uncomfortable for me, and I think it would be bad for the McCain campaign."

McKinnon, who was a Democrat before serving as President Bush's ad maker in 2000 and 2004, said that he plans to be behind McCain "100 percent" no matter who the Democratic nominee is. He explained, however, that if the Democrats nominate Obama, he will be supporting McCain "from the sidelines."

While saying that he does not agree with Obama on every issue, McKinnon gushed about the Illinois Democrat.

"I met Barack Obama, I read his book, I like him a great deal," said McKinnon. "I disagree with him on very fundamental issues. But I think, as I said, I think it would a great race for the country."

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/20...in-adviser.html

[no name 1]

...speaking of schmucks being smitten by Obama...

McCain Adviser Won't Fight Obama

ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports: A top adviser to John McCain said Wednesday that he will step down from the Arizona senator's presidential campaign if the presumed GOP nominee faces Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., in the general election.

"I would simply be uncomfortable being in a campaign that would be inevitably attacking Barack Obama," said McCain adviser Mark McKinnon in an interview with NPR's "All Things Considered." "I think it would be uncomfortable for me, and I think it would be bad for the McCain campaign."

McKinnon, who was a Democrat before serving as President Bush's ad maker in 2000 and 2004, said that he plans to be behind McCain "100 percent" no matter who the Democratic nominee is. He explained, however, that if the Democrats nominate Obama, he will be supporting McCain "from the sidelines."

While saying that he does not agree with Obama on every issue, McKinnon gushed about the Illinois Democrat.

"I met Barack Obama, I read his book, I like him a great deal," said McKinnon. "I disagree with him on very fundamental issues. But I think, as I said, I think it would a great race for the country."

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/20...in-adviser.html

Wow. Absolutely no loyalty. I'd fire his a$$ if I was McCain.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Kaydee, if you like that kind of entertainment, you should watch the infomercials late at night on TV with the fake audience and speakers. It's a riot.

...this is all you can up with?

I agree, these dems like most are pretty fake.

[kaydee457 13]

Kaydee, if you like that kind of entertainment, you should watch the infomercials late at night on TV with the fake audience and speakers. It's a riot.

...this is all you can up with?

I agree, these dems like most are pretty fake.

Well, this wasn't the first time they were asked this question.

A different group was asked the very same question about 3 weeks ago (the primary beforehand) and drew a complete and total blank!

Not a single person was able to respond with anything at all after the majority of them in the room had raised their hand to the question of how many of them were going to vote for Barack!

Simply scary how these people would choose a president!

[SteveLaura 0]

Maybe they feel he's someone they could sit down and have a beer with...

[kaydee457 13]

Maybe they feel he's someone they could sit down and have a beer with...

Yes, like I said, their ignorance of this man is astounding!

[SteveLaura 0]

Maybe they feel he's someone they could sit down and have a beer with...

Yes, like I said, their ignorance of this man is astounding!

Indeed. Fool me once...

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Kaydee, if you like that kind of entertainment, you should watch the infomercials late at night on TV with the fake audience and speakers. It's a riot.

...this is all you can up with?

I agree, these dems like most are pretty fake.

Well, this wasn't the first time they were asked this question.

A different group was asked the very same question about 3 weeks ago (the primary beforehand) and drew a complete and total blank!

Not a single person was able to respond with anything at all after the majority of them in the room had raised their hand to the question of how many of them were going to vote for Barack!

Simply scary how these people would choose a president!

The main theme I have heard him talk about is " how much we need to suffer to get back on our feet" This is a guilt play which most democrats can relate to.

[AnewKINDofFEELIN 0]

I wish they would have asked the "Hillary has more substance" lady to name a Clinton accomplishment.

[kaydee457 13]

I wish they would have asked the "Hillary has more substance" lady to name a Clinton accomplishment.

Bill's accomplishments? She doesn't have any as she's been living vicariously through him......

[AnewKINDofFEELIN 0]

I wish they would have asked the "Hillary has more substance" lady to name a Clinton accomplishment.

Bill's accomplishments? She doesn't have any as she's been living vicariously through him......

Exactly, yet they try to put her above him by loading the questions. Fox News is pushing hard for Clinton right now. They know that it is the Republicans' only hope.

[kaydee457 13]

I wish they would have asked the "Hillary has more substance" lady to name a Clinton accomplishment.

Bill's accomplishments? She doesn't have any as she's been living vicariously through him......

Exactly, yet they try to put her above him by loading the questions. Fox News is pushing hard for Clinton right now. They know that it is the Republicans' only hope.

Excuse me but I'm a "news junkie" and I watch FOX news everyday, from about 3pm to 9pm, when I switch to CNN....

I've seen no bias for any candidate on FOX news, unless it's commentary from one of several pairs of political commentators they employ for such discussions......These are commetary, not news, and the teams consist of a democrats, and an equal number of republicans.......they debate..that's what they're supposed to do.

There are commentators, such as Bill O'reilly that have not come forward to endorse any candidte, and there's teams such as Hannity(conservative) and Colmbs(liberal) that are commentary (not news) that have equal coverage.

Perhaps you're confusing CNBC and commentators like Chris Mathews ( i have research this name, not sure I got it right), a staunch liberal and Obama supporter that CNBC actually used as a moderator for one of the dms debates. they were blasted by everyone for using such a biased liberal under the guise of "fair" moderating. He clearly has an agenda.

Edited February 14, 2008 by kaydee457

[AnewKINDofFEELIN 0]

I wish they would have asked the "Hillary has more substance" lady to name a Clinton accomplishment.

Bill's accomplishments? She doesn't have any as she's been living vicariously through him......

Exactly, yet they try to put her above him by loading the questions. Fox News is pushing hard for Clinton right now. They know that it is the Republicans' only hope.

Excuse me but I'm a "news junkie" and I watch FOX news everyday, from about 3pm to 9pm, when I switch to CNN....

I've seen no bias for any candidate on FOX news, unless it's commentary from one of several pairs of political commentators they employ for such discussions......These are commetary, not news, and the teams consist of a democrats, and an equal number of republicans.......they debate..that's what they're supposed to do.

There are commentators, such as Bill O'reilly that have not come forward to endorse any candidte, and there's teams such as Hannity(conservative) and Colmbs(liberal) that are commentary (not news) that have equal coverage.

Perhaps you're confusing CNBC and commentators like Chris Mathews ( i have research this name, not sure I got it right), a staunch liberal and Obama supporter that CNBC actually used as a moderator for one of the dms debates. they were blasted by everyone for using such a biased liberal under the guise of "fair" moderating. He clearly has an agenda.

Bias doesn't have to be a commentator stating he likes one over the other. Some things are as simple as placement of positions within a broadcast. They can subliminally imply importance of one over the other. Then you have things like the Fox News cutting off Ron Paul in the middle of an answer or completely removing his answers from re-airs of the debates. They took this one out of reairs: