Jump to content
Sofiyya

Lou Dobbs leaves CNN

 Share

175 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
In 2007, Dobbs repeatedly and falsely claimed that Hispanics were responsible for bringing 7,000 new cases of leprosy to the United States in a three year period. The actual total number of all leprosy cases in the United States in that timeframe was on the order of one twentieth of that amount. The Federal Government's National Hansen’s Disease Program specifically refuted Dobbs' claims, but when asked about his statements Dobbs denied he'd made them and took offense at being questioned on the matter

Are you joking? It's a know fact that a third world country will have more diseases than a first world country.

Actually Lou nailed it on this one. Disease is why countries like Australia have very strict quarantine procedures. I cannot even bring a piece of timber in AUS without it being quarantined. All immigrants must be thoroughly screened and vaccinated. Keep in mind most LEGAL immigrants are not poor, so they will naturally be healthier and less likely to be carrying any diseases. Yet you are going to sit here and expect people to believe that dirt poor Mexicans jumping over the border are not transmitting any new diseases to America. Absolute rubbish.

You realize countries like Aus have actually eradicated Malaria and even rabies by means of strict quarantine.

Regions with Malaria

MH_L1_facts_map.gif

I'd like to give a shoutout to Bohol which has no risk for Malaria. As seen (its the small island in the PI that isn't red..... woohooo

K-1 Visa

Service Center : California Service Center

Consulate : Manila, Philippines

I-129F Sent : 2009-08-14

I-129F NOA1 : 2009-08-18

I-129F NOA2 : 2009-10-23

NVC Received : 2009-10-27

NVC Left : 2009-11-06

Consulate Received : 2009-11-12

Packet 3 Received : 2009-11-27

Interview Date : 2009-12-16

Interview Result : APPROVED

Second Interview

(If Required):

Second Interview Result:

Visa Received :

US Entry :

Marriage :

Comments :

Processing

Estimates/Stats : Your I-129f was approved in 66 days from your NOA1 date.

Your interview took 120 days from your I-129F NOA1 date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
I think Lou Dobbs resignation opens an incredible opportunity for a new show on Fox (As if there is ANY doubt that is where he is going). The new show would be "Who Irrationally Hates Mexicans More, starring Lout Dobbs, and BooYah!". The format of the shouw would be a rapid fire "Douche-Off", with both sides spewing their unresearched inuendo and conjecture and passing it off as facts.

I actually used to like Dobbs (except for his ignorant racist fears about Mexican immigrants) until the whole "bring it on toughguy" line. Come on Lou, you couldn't even beat up my grandmother. He was clearly partisan in his own commentary, but on the air, he was fairly balanced in his criticism.

Yes because supporting legal immigration is racist against Mexicans.

You are talking about Rob here. Aka when you cannot make a legitimate argument, just start rambling horsesh-t. It's an LA thing. Hence, why no one ever takes people from that region seriously. To the contrary, if we want to know about the latest sunset developments in tanning and plastic surgery, we know who to ask.

Wow BY you truly are ignorant. You are so full of preconceived notions you appear to be incapable of anything beyond your own nose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow BY you truly are ignorant. You are so full of preconceived notions you appear to be incapable of anything beyond your own nose.

yada yada yada. Try participate in a legitimate discussion for a change. I am sure someone from LA is capable of stringing a few sentences together to discuss something outside of what Paris is doing or who she is screwing.

Edited by Booyah!

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Wow BY you truly are ignorant. You are so full of preconceived notions you appear to be incapable of anything beyond your own nose.

yada yada yada. Try participate in a legitimate discussion for a change.

You should take your own advice. Remember our little conversations about referencing your citations and not passing off your bullsh!t made up stories about "my local magistrate says _____________" as legitimate facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should take your own advice. Remember our little conversations about referencing your citations and not passing off your bullsh!t made up stories about "my local magistrate says _____________" as legitimate facts.

Discussion? Since you first made that statement, a number of months ago, I am yet to see you reference or cite one single thing you have said. Yet ironically you ask for citations from others. Dude you are a hypocrite.

How is that one piece of evidence from a large pool not legitimate? The magistrate's opinion is worth more than some idiot from the LA area. Like any liberal here, you seem to assume that since there is no study on something, it must not be true. Has it ever occurred to you that such studies are not carried out because certain Americans will brand them racist?

Edited by Booyah!

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
You should take your own advice. Remember our little conversations about referencing your citations and not passing off your bullsh!t made up stories about "my local magistrate says _____________" as legitimate facts.

Discussion? Since you first made that statement, a number of months ago, I am yet to see you reference or cite one single thing you have said. Yet ironically you ask for citations from others. Dude you are a hypocrite.

How is that one piece of evidence from a large pool not legitimate? The magistrate's opinion is worth more than some idiot from the LA area. Like any liberal here, you seem to assume that since there is no study on something, it must not be true. Has it ever occurred to you that such studies are not carried out because certain Americans will brand them racist?

By - if you're a conservative. Remember, a liberal must always refer to you as racist.

Conservative = Racist. Brainwashing tactics.

K-1 Visa

Service Center : California Service Center

Consulate : Manila, Philippines

I-129F Sent : 2009-08-14

I-129F NOA1 : 2009-08-18

I-129F NOA2 : 2009-10-23

NVC Received : 2009-10-27

NVC Left : 2009-11-06

Consulate Received : 2009-11-12

Packet 3 Received : 2009-11-27

Interview Date : 2009-12-16

Interview Result : APPROVED

Second Interview

(If Required):

Second Interview Result:

Visa Received :

US Entry :

Marriage :

Comments :

Processing

Estimates/Stats : Your I-129f was approved in 66 days from your NOA1 date.

Your interview took 120 days from your I-129F NOA1 date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
You should take your own advice. Remember our little conversations about referencing your citations and not passing off your bullsh!t made up stories about "my local magistrate says _____________" as legitimate facts.

Discussion? Since you first made that statement, a number of months ago, I am yet to see you reference or cite one single thing you have said. Yet ironically you ask for citations from others. Dude you are a hypocrite.

How is that one piece of evidence from a large pool not legitimate? The magistrate's opinion is worth more than some idiot from the LA area. Like any liberal here, you seem to assume that since there is no study on something, it must not be true. Has it ever occurred to you that such studies are not carried out because certain Americans will brand them racist?

OK BY, let me try to explain something to you. If I am trying to back up my point with facts from a third party, then I will cite the source. But as per usual, you don't seem to understand that. Your brand of bullsh!t seems so intertwined with you trying to make any sort of point. Quit being disingenuous and use your remaining braincells. You make up facts or at best post from some blatantly racist blog that uses skewed or out of date numbers. Or there is the standard "explain the link in my signatrue" line.

If there is no published study on a topic, your fictional accounts of your world travels are no substitute. They are what they are, your made up fantasy world. Make a point or go play in traffic. Either way, your still irrelavent.

You should take your own advice. Remember our little conversations about referencing your citations and not passing off your bullsh!t made up stories about "my local magistrate says _____________" as legitimate facts.

Discussion? Since you first made that statement, a number of months ago, I am yet to see you reference or cite one single thing you have said. Yet ironically you ask for citations from others. Dude you are a hypocrite.

How is that one piece of evidence from a large pool not legitimate? The magistrate's opinion is worth more than some idiot from the LA area. Like any liberal here, you seem to assume that since there is no study on something, it must not be true. Has it ever occurred to you that such studies are not carried out because certain Americans will brand them racist?

By - if you're a conservative. Remember, a liberal must always refer to you as racist.

Conservative = Racist. Brainwashing tactics.

Joe, don't be stupid. Seriously, make an attempt. BY is racist, but that would entail you actually reading his posts instead of sucking him off after each post like the lap dog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By - if you're a conservative. Remember, a liberal must always refer to you as racist.

Conservative = Racist. Brainwashing tactics.

They ask for studies but anything you post is discredited anyway; as they don't support their ideology. EG The huge disparity between black vs whites, in terms of the homicide rate.

Ironically Rob and Pedroh asked me to prove my points regarding Hispanics and crime. I did and using numerous sources too might I add. The latest source is in my sig, for all to see. Not sure if it's up to Rob's 'standards' though. After all, it's only from the FBI. Unlike the Hispanic center for Latino bla bla bla, those guys are apparently dodgy.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
By - if you're a conservative. Remember, a liberal must always refer to you as racist.

Conservative = Racist. Brainwashing tactics.

They ask for studies but anything you post is discredited anyway; as they don't support their ideology. EG The huge disparity between black vs whites, in terms of the homicide rate.

Ironically Rob and Pedroh asked me to prove my points regarding Hispanics and crime. I did and using numerous sources too might I add. The latest source is in my sig, for all to see. Not sure if it's up to Rob's 'standards' though. After all, it's only from the FBI. Unlike the Hispanic center for Latino bla bla bla, those guys are apparently dodgy.

BY, come on now, don't try to act as ignorant and uneducated as Joe now. I think you're a bit smarter than that. You post studies from blatantly racist blogs like American Renaissance. I wouldn't post something from a fringe left blog and pass it off as a legitimate study. You seem to cite these sorts of websites because it's only the racist fringe that seem to support your point of view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK BY, let me try to explain something to you. If I am trying to back up my point with facts from a third party, then I will cite the source. But as per usual, you don't seem to understand that. Your brand of bullsh!t seems so intertwined with you trying to make any sort of point. Quit being disingenuous and use your remaining braincells. You make up facts or at best post from some blatantly racist blog that uses skewed or out of date numbers. Or there is the standard "explain the link in my signatrue" line.

Rob, post at least one piece of factual information and then come talk about citing and referencing. :lol: Aka walk the talk; practice what you preach.

If there is no published study on a topic, your fictional accounts of your world travels are no substitute. They are what they are, your made up fantasy world. Make a point or go play in traffic.

I am sure you have a lot of proof of that. I on the other hand could scan my passport and roll your sorry azz in about 2 seconds.

Either way, your still irrelavent.

What ever helps you sleep at night.. :lol:

Edited by Booyah!

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BY, come on now, don't try to act as ignorant and uneducated as Joe now. I think you're a bit smarter than that. You post studies from blatantly racist blogs like American Renaissance. I wouldn't post something from a fringe left blog and pass it off as a legitimate study. You seem to cite these sorts of websites because it's only the racist fringe that seem to support your point of view.

You don't read what people post do you? Of course not. You are from LA and only gloat about yourself. :lol: The fact that these stats are hard to find is not my opinion alone, I have read countless articles from abroad that illustrate the same thing.

Are you suggesting the FBI's most wanted list is also made up too? There has to come a point when fact after fact is posted, where an individual at least considers it. That is, rather than try to brush off the source.

Yes a source has to be examined. Furthermore, the sources source of data. However, what I don't do is just disregard any data that does not support my ideological view. I let the facts guide my view, rather than my view guide the facts.

Edited by Booyah!

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
OK BY, let me try to explain something to you. If I am trying to back up my point with facts from a third party, then I will cite the source. But as per usual, you don't seem to understand that. Your brand of bullsh!t seems so intertwined with you trying to make any sort of point. Quit being disingenuous and use your remaining braincells. You make up facts or at best post from some blatantly racist blog that uses skewed or out of date numbers. Or there is the standard "explain the link in my signatrue" line.

Rob, post at least one piece of factual information and then come talk about citing and referencing. :lol: Aka walk the talk; practice what you preach.

BY, when I post something that is not my personal opinion, I do cite my references. You Just love to make things up and pass it off as fact. Your local magistrate, unless is quoted by name with specific numbers is not a source. Do I need to discern for you what the difference between fact and opinion are because you clearly seem to have blurred that boundary.

If there is no published study on a topic, your fictional accounts of your world travels are no substitute. They are what they are, your made up fantasy world. Make a point or go play in traffic.

I am sure you have a lot of proof of that. I on the other hand could scan my passport and roll your sorry azz in about 2 seconds.

Then do it. Otherwise stfu. You're not the only person whose ventured beyond your own borders.

BY, come on now, don't try to act as ignorant and uneducated as Joe now. I think you're a bit smarter than that. You post studies from blatantly racist blogs like American Renaissance. I wouldn't post something from a fringe left blog and pass it off as a legitimate study. You seem to cite these sorts of websites because it's only the racist fringe that seem to support your point of view.

You don't read what people post do you? Of course not. You are from LA and only gloat about yourself. :lol: The fact that these stats are hard to find is not my opinion alone, I have read countless articles from abroad that illustrate the same thing.

Are you suggesting the FBI's most wanted list is also made up too? There has to come a point when fact after fact is posted, where an individual at least considers it. That is, rather than try to brush off the source.

Yes a source has to be examined. Furthermore, the sources source of data. However, what I don't do is just disregard any data that does not support my ideological view. I let the facts guide my view, rather than my view guide the facts.

The bolded part is a load of ####### and you know it BY. Facts? Come on now, you post heresay and opinion half the time and pass it off as facts. Post something from a legitimate source, a think tank, or something from academia. Citing American Renaissance is like citing MAD magazine, with less credibility.

I don't doubt the FBI data, but I do question your opinion about it. It has to do with socioeconomic factors, not them being Mexican.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BY, when I post something that is not my personal opinion, I do cite my references.

Biggest load of garbage I have ever heard. What do you think this is? The jury who listened to the OJ case. Even on when joking, I rolled you using facts. You called Aus convicts yet the homicide rate of CA (per 100,000) is nearly 10 times that of Aus. Not to mention, the robbery rate is almost double.

I don't doubt the FBI data, but I do question your opinion about it. It has to do with socioeconomic factors, not them being Mexican.

The good old it's "socioeconomic factors" excuse. Too bad, Hispanics are not the only people or immigrants that are poor in the world. Clearly numerous like-minded people here assume that if you had groups of 100,000 people from a handful of countries and in the same socioeconomic class, they would all share the same crime stats. I disagree, as does reality.

Or are you suggesting that an illegal alien who has come here on their own free will, not even asked for permission, somehow has a moral right to commit crime because of their circumstances? First it's black Americans who get to use these excuses, now it's Hispanics. Just a pitty you have no way of pinning this on the whites too, I am sure your types would have done so by now. Then again you do resort to the you hate brown people rhetoric.

Furthermore, since moving here I have been informed that socioeconomic circumstances are apparently a good reason for murder. Clearly these people wanted by the FBI were simply trying to steal to eat and just accidentally shot people. Gang bangers, for example, are just good honest people trying to feed their family.

Thank God the rest of America sees through these pathetic excuses.

Edited by Booyah!

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline

You rolled me BY? Keep your gay fantasies to yourself. I don't generally delve into arguments about crime or race with you because it's like playing chess with a kid with downs syndrome. At some point, you're going to tip the board over and shout "I WIN!!".

For your information BY, that there was opinion, so there is no need to cite any references. Now, if I made a statement like "BY is a retard", my citation would be a link to your profile and instructions to look at your previous posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...