Stepping on Political Toes-Are we going headed to WWIII?

[Dr. A ♥ O 203]

I thought this had already passed on Oct. 11th, 2007 but looks like it's still in process. My question is why is something that happened 100 years ago being brought up now? If you've been following this story then you know that this passing is potentially very bad for the US with the war in Iraq right now. Turkey threatens there is reprocussions and will bomb the Kurds who are the only party not heavily involved right now with the war in Iraq. Also Turkey is our number one way to getting supplies to the troops over there. Why are we throwing flowers to the Armeinan's now? What do we have to gain long term from this?

By AVET DEMOURIAN, Associated Press Writer

14 minutes ago

YEREVAN, Armenia - The chatter these days in Yerevan's Anahit Deluxe beauty salon isn't about the latest hairstyles, celebrity gossip or the coming winter.

It's about the U.S. Congress, where a resolution labeling the World War I-era killings of Armenians by Ottoman Turks hangs in the balance.

"If it passes, I'll treat all my girlfriends and customers that day to candy," said the salon's owner, Anait Gezalian.

Thousands of miles from Washington, U.S. House Resolution No. 106 is the talk of the town for Yerevan and the rest of this landlocked former Soviet republic of rugged highlands and grinding poverty.

If Congress recognizes the killings as genocide, it could be a cathartic moment for Armenians. They have striven for decades to gain wide international recognition for their view of the long-ago bloodshed, creating a dispute that has poisoned relations with modern Turkey.

Historians estimate that up to 1.5 million Armenians were killed by Ottoman Turks around the time of World War I. Scholars view it as the first genocide of the 20th century, but Turkey says that the toll has been inflated and that those killed were victims of civil war and unrest.

Jubilation followed the House Foreign Affairs Committee's approval of the resolution Oct. 10, with Armenian lawmakers giving a standing ovation to their American counterparts and a pro-government newspaper declaring in a headline: "Historical Justice is Restored."

Sentiments have sobered since, as the fate of the resolution is now in question.

Turkey, a U.S. ally and NATO member, recalled its ambassador from Washington for consultations in protest, warning the U.S. of serious damage to relations and complications for the U.S. military operation in Iraq. The Bush administration opposes the resolution, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Wednesday that prospects for a House vote were now uncertain.

In Yerevan, where a slow construction boom is bringing Western stores, flashy nightclubs and upscale restaurants to a run-down city, Armenians are closely watching events unfold — through television and newspaper reports, on the Internet and with the help of the more than 1 million-strong diaspora in the United States.

"The Fate of the Resolution is Uncertain," one newspaper declared. "Congressmen regret that they voted for the resolution," another reported. Another publishes a running tally of U.S. lawmakers, pro and con.

"How much longer can Turkey ... blackmail Washington, plot demarche, threaten worse relations, frighten and so on?" asked Karen Vartazarian, a 28-year-old Web designer.

"We're convinced that the House of Representatives will make the right decision and will not abandon the democratic values the United States was founded on," said Arpi Vartanian, regional director of the Armenian Assembly of America, an advocacy group.

Prime Minister Serzh Sarkisian went to Washington on Thursday for World Bank and other meetings. He also met with Defense Secretary Robert Gates, though Gates told reporters later that the genocide resolution was not discussed.

Some Armenians fear the resolution could cause trouble for Armenians living in Turkey, or the thousands who try to make a living by going there to buy goods for resale back home.

Turkey closed its border with Armenia in 1993 during a war between Armenia and Azerbaijan, a Muslim ally of the Turks, and maintains a virtual blockade that has all but crippled Armenia's economy, which relies heavily on investment and support from Armenians abroad.

After years of disappointment, suffering and isolation, many Armenians are not counting on a vote by Congress.

"So many times has recognition of the genocide been promised and so many times (the promise) hasn't been fulfilled. (But) one can live through this," said Artem Yerkanian, a commentator on the state-run channel Shant.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071019/ap_on_...cide_resolution

[peejay 327]

Why are we throwing flowers to the Armeinan's now? What do we have to gain long term from this?

It depends on who "we" is. Look at who is sponsoring and co-sponsoring this legislation in the House.

"They" are attempting to provoke Turkey into denying the USA access to military staging areas in their country in an attempt to undermine the war effort in Iraq. Make no mistake...that is the real reason for this resolution.

Maybe because they don't have the nuts to go on record of cutting funding for the war? No matter if any American is for or against the war in Iraq, actively undermining the war effort is lame.

Get out of Iraq if that is the consensus, but it is lame to undermine ongoing operations. That is not the way to force an exit from Iraq.

"They" should be ashamed. And this resolution will not get anywhere...just like the efforts to cut military funding.

[Dr. A ♥ O 203]

Ah ha. I was wondering what was going on.

[Aaron_WSU 0]

What is more troubling to me is Putin announcing that they will be developing a "new generation of nuclear weapons".

[Dr. A ♥ O 203]

What is more troubling to me is Putin announcing that they will be developing a "new generation of nuclear weapons".

In reguards to Iran? It's known he is supplying them with sophisticated weapons and aiding them in their nuclear program, as well participating in China with their military manuvers, and aiding Venezula militarily to keep the US out of installing missile bases there.

Why is it when we bring up the heavy subjects nobody wants to talk about it but bring up something light and they bite?

[Dan J 277]

What is more troubling to me is Putin announcing that they will be developing a "new generation of nuclear weapons".

In reguards to Iran? It's known he is supplying them with sophisticated weapons and aiding them in their nuclear program, as well participating in China with their military manuvers, and aiding Venezula militarily to keep the US out of installing missile bases there.

Why is it when we bring up the heavy subjects nobody wants to talk about it but bring up something light and they bite?

Its not really in Russia's interest to support Iran. They have as much trouble with extreme Islamists as the rest of the world. But they are posturing themselves to return to the superpower status they once had. And doing so under the guise of democracy.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

What is more troubling to me is Putin announcing that they will be developing a "new generation of nuclear weapons".

The most troubling thing in this contest thus far was Bush's warning of WWIII. That sick son of a ####### might just pull that off.

[Dr. A ♥ O 203]

What is more troubling to me is Putin announcing that they will be developing a "new generation of nuclear weapons".

The most troubling thing in this contest thus far was Bush's warning of WWIII. That sick son of a ####### might just pull that off.