Jump to content
Trumplestiltskin

Justice, CIA to probe destruction of taped interrogations

 Share

3 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Justice Department and the CIA will jointly investigate the destruction of videotapes of CIA interrogations of two al Qaeda suspects, a top official said.

The Justice Department's assistant attorney general for national security, Kenneth L. Wainstein, announced the investigation Saturday in a letter to the CIA's top lawyer, John Rizzo.

The probe will determine "whether further investigation is warranted," Wainstein said.

CIA Director Mike Hayden said his agency will cooperate fully.

"I welcome it as an opportunity to address questions that have arisen over the destruction back in 2005 of videotapes," he said.

President Bush and Vice President Cheney learned about the videotapes Thursday, when Hayden briefed them about the tapes and their subsequent destruction, administration officials said Friday.

The tapes -- showing using newly approved "alternative" interrogation techniques -- were recorded in 2002, Hayden said Thursday in a letter to CIA employees.

Osama bin Laden lieutenant Abu Zubayda was one of two al Qaeda suspects whose interrogations were videotaped, according to a government official with knowledge of the tapes.

The CIA made the decision to destroy the tapes "only after it was determined they were no longer of intelligence value and not relevant to any internal, legislative, or judicial inquiries," Hayden said.

But Rizzo was against the destruction of videotapes, a former intelligence official said Friday.

The ex-official, who did not want to be identified, told CNN that Rizzo didn't know they had been destroyed until it was already done.

Also Friday, two senior Bush administration officials told CNN that Harriet Miers -- who held a series of top posts at the White House starting in 2001 -- was aware of the tapes and told the CIA not to destroy them.

Miers became White House counsel in February 2005, and resigned in January.

The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of potential investigations on the matter, said they believe this is "exculpatory" for the White House because it shows a top official had told the CIA not to destroy the tapes.

The officials also said the information about the tapes was not relayed to the president until this week.

Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Connecticut, said explanations of the events were "stretching credulity."

"There's something going on here," Dodd, a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, said on CNN's "The Situation Room."

"We're not getting the full story, hence the reason why there should be an investigation. It goes to the heart of our national security, our protection, our safety, our isolation in the world. That's why this is so important."

Another lawmaker also severely criticized the destruction.

Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Illinois sent a letter to Attorney General Michael Mukasey calling for an investigation into whether any laws were broken by "CIA officials who covered up the existence of these videotapes."

The Justice Department later said it had received Durbin's letter, but would not comment other than to say it had begun gathering facts.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/law/12/08/cia.v...apes/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NEWS FLASH!!!! THE CIA IS KEEPING SECRETS!!!!!

Seriously though. If the CIA has something it doesn't want out classify it, don't destroy it. Getting rid of the tapes is like waving a red flag in front of the bull. It only invites attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
NEWS FLASH!!!! THE CIA IS KEEPING SECRETS!!!!!

Seriously though. If the CIA has something it doesn't want out classify it, don't destroy it. Getting rid of the tapes is like waving a red flag in front of the bull. It only invites attention.

Its not very convenient - considering the question mark not too long ago about whether the interrogation techniques being used amounted to 'torture'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...