Jump to content
Hilarious Clinton

Woman Arrested in Connection With 'Green Card Marriage' Craigslist Ad

 Share

50 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
There are tons of ads like that on craigslist! Most of them are not financial exchanges of money. But more and more USC's want EU passports. So they offer to marry a EU citizen and offer to "switch" so both get a new passport.

Not a bad idea actually :) Except it's very unfair but not too bad of an idea

Why is it unfair?

biden_pinhead.jpgspace.gifrolling-stones-american-flag-tongue.jpgspace.gifinside-geico.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline

Everyone knows its a crime to marry for a greencard. EVERYONE. Period. Dipshits...

22 Jun 05 - We met in a tiny bar in Williamsburg, Va. (spent all summer together)

27 May 06 - Sasha comes back for a 2nd glorious summer (spent 8 months apart)

01 Jan 07 - Jason travels to Moscow for 2 weeks with Sasha

27 May 07 - Jason again travels to Moscow for 2 weeks of perfection

14 July 07 - I-129F and all related documents sent to VSC

16 July 07 - I-129F delivered to VSC and signed for by P. Novak

20 July 07 - NOA1 issued / receipt number assigned

27 Sep 07 - Jason travels to Moscow to be with Sasha for 2 weeks

28 Nov 07 - NOA2 issued...TOUCHED!...then...APPROVED!!!

01 Dec 07 - NVC receives/assigns case #

04 Dec 07 - NVC sends case to U.S. Embassy Moscow

26 Dec 07 - Jason visits Sasha in Russia for the 4th and final time of 2007 :)

22 Feb 08 - Moscow Interview! (APPROVED!!!)..Yay!

24 Mar 08 - Sasha and Jason reunite in the U.S. :)

31 May 08 - Married

29 Dec 08- Alexander is born

11 Jan 10 - AOS / AP / EAD package sent

19 Jan 10 - AOS NOA1 / AP NOA1 / EAD NOA1

08 Feb 10 - AOS case transferred to CSC

16 Mar 10 - AP received

16 Mar 10 - AOS approved

19 Mar 10 - EAD received

22 Mar 10 - GC received

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Brazil
Timeline

This is the exact reason it is such cunbersome and time consuming process for the rest of us.

Ignorance is now a defense.

Put them both in jail.

LOS ANGELES — At least she was being honest.

Yuliya Kalinina, 24, spelled out exactly what she was looking for in a husband in her Internet ad:

"Green Card Marriage — Will pay $300/month. Total $15,000," the Russian national wrote in an ad placed on the Craigslist website. "This is strictly platonic business offer, sex not involved."

The ad caught the attention of the man who would eventually marry her on Feb. 17, 2006. But it also alerted agents from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Kalinina, from Russia, and her 30-year-old husband, Benjamin C. Adams, were arrested last week for what federal prosecutors allege was a sham marriage.

Robert Schoch, special agent in charge of ICE investigations in L.A., says it is the first criminal case he is aware of in which people allegedly used the Internet to engineer a sham marriage for a green card.

Attorney Dale Rubin, who is representing Kalinina, said she didn't know it was illegal to marry for a green card, which he said was evidenced by the blatant language in her ad.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,315821,00.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Eh, I'm not so sure how I feel about this, tbh...I've been thinking about this a lot since that person asked me if I'd marry his friend for money....of course, that's sooooo not for me and I'd never do that, BUT the USC is still filling out an affadavit of support in this instance & to me, that's a lot better than just being illegal. USCIS doesn't define a marriage as requiring love....I suppose the money aspect of it is the problem...but it's on par (imo) with a well off older man marrying a young, gorgeous woman from an impoverished nation. They may not love each other, but they both mutually benefit from the marriage.

I would also say this straightforwardness is a lot better than the foreign born so duping the USC into thinking it's a traditional, love filled marriage.

Edited by LisaD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I brough items on craigslist but not a wife lol they should block those kind of ads :P

Citizenship

Event Date

Service Center : California Service Center

CIS Office : San Francisco CA

Date Filed : 2008-06-11

NOA Date : 2008-06-18

Bio. Appt. : 2008-07-08

Citizenship Interview

USCIS San Francisco Field Office

Wednesday, September 10,2008

Time 2:35PM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, I'm not so sure how I feel about this, tbh...I've been thinking about this a lot since that person asked me if I'd marry his friend for money....of course, that's sooooo not for me and I'd never do that, BUT the USC is still filling out an affadavit of support in this instance & to me, that's a lot better than just being illegal. USCIS doesn't define a marriage as requiring love....I suppose the money aspect of it is the problem...but it's on par (imo) with a well off older man marrying a young, gorgeous woman from an impoverished nation. They may not love each other, but they both mutually benefit from the marriage.

I would also say this straightforwardness is a lot better than the foreign born so duping the USC into thinking it's a traditional, love filled marriage.

It just means the USC is party to the fraud, unfortunately. USCIS doesn't require that a couple love each other or really speak the same language or prove that they've spent enough time together or plan to have kids or understand each other's culture or anything, but they DO require that the marriage not be entered into primarily to secure permanent residency.

It's morally marginally better than convincing some poor dupe she wants him, but legally, it's worse.

AOS

-

Filed: 8/1/07

NOA1:9/7/07

Biometrics: 9/28/07

EAD/AP: 10/17/07

EAD card ordered again (who knows, maybe we got the two-fer deal): 10/23/-7

Transferred to CSC: 10/26/07

Approved: 11/21/07

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
Eh, I'm not so sure how I feel about this, tbh...I've been thinking about this a lot since that person asked me if I'd marry his friend for money....of course, that's sooooo not for me and I'd never do that, BUT the USC is still filling out an affadavit of support in this instance & to me, that's a lot better than just being illegal. USCIS doesn't define a marriage as requiring love....I suppose the money aspect of it is the problem...but it's on par (imo) with a well off older man marrying a young, gorgeous woman from an impoverished nation. They may not love each other, but they both mutually benefit from the marriage.

I would also say this straightforwardness is a lot better than the foreign born so duping the USC into thinking it's a traditional, love filled marriage.

It just means the USC is party to the fraud, unfortunately. USCIS doesn't require that a couple love each other or really speak the same language or prove that they've spent enough time together or plan to have kids or understand each other's culture or anything, but they DO require that the marriage not be entered into primarily to secure permanent residency.

It's morally marginally better than convincing some poor dupe she wants him, but legally, it's worse.

Yeah I getcha....but is it really much worse than an IMB? Seriously, if a couple doesn't speak the same lang...isn't it kinda implied that there's at least a visa benefit to the non-USC?

Edited by LisaD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
but it's on par (imo) with a well off older man marrying a young, gorgeous woman from an impoverished nation. They may not love each other, but they both mutually benefit from the marriage.

The stereotype couple you described are NOT committing marriage fraud as they intend to stay married. ...and who is to quanitify whether any couple here 'loves' each other beyond the evidence to support a bonafide marriage to immigration?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but it's on par (imo) with a well off older man marrying a young, gorgeous woman from an impoverished nation. They may not love each other, but they both mutually benefit from the marriage.

The stereotype couple you described are NOT committing marriage fraud as they intend to stay married. ...and who is to quanitify whether any couple here 'loves' each other beyond the evidence to support a bonafide marriage to immigration?

As long as they intend to marry for reasons other than immigration benefits, USCIS doesn't care if they're miserable, or if the benefits aren't love. Or if the couple is deluding themselves. Or even if the couple getting married is a profoundly bad idea.

A lot of people seem to be under the impression that USCIS is judging the fitness of their spouse or the fitness of the relationship, but they're not.

AOS

-

Filed: 8/1/07

NOA1:9/7/07

Biometrics: 9/28/07

EAD/AP: 10/17/07

EAD card ordered again (who knows, maybe we got the two-fer deal): 10/23/-7

Transferred to CSC: 10/26/07

Approved: 11/21/07

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
but it's on par (imo) with a well off older man marrying a young, gorgeous woman from an impoverished nation. They may not love each other, but they both mutually benefit from the marriage.

The stereotype couple you described are NOT committing marriage fraud as they intend to stay married. ...and who is to quanitify whether any couple here 'loves' each other beyond the evidence to support a bonafide marriage to immigration?

I'm not quantifying whether people 'love' each other or not...since love is not a prereq to a 'bonafide' marriage in the eyes of USCIS, it's superfluous to this conversation. I wasn't implying that so and so doesn't love each other.....I'm just saying that with an IMB, surely the non-foreign SO looking for 'an American' is doing so at least partially for immi benefit.

This particular story was blatant, and yes, morally wrong as there's money being exchanged. But at the same time, all I'm saying is I see some shades of grey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
but it's on par (imo) with a well off older man marrying a young, gorgeous woman from an impoverished nation. They may not love each other, but they both mutually benefit from the marriage.

The stereotype couple you described are NOT committing marriage fraud as they intend to stay married. ...and who is to quanitify whether any couple here 'loves' each other beyond the evidence to support a bonafide marriage to immigration?

I'm not quantifying whether people 'love' each other or not...since love is not a prereq to a 'bonafide' marriage in the eyes of USCIS, it's superfluous to this conversation. I wasn't implying that so and so doesn't love each other.....I'm just saying that with an IMB, surely the non-foreign SO looking for 'an American' is doing so at least partially for immi benefit.

This particular story was blatant, and yes, morally wrong as there's money being exchanged. But at the same time, all I'm saying is I see some shades of grey.

I agree with that. I think that's true for all laws, though....shades of grey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: China
Timeline
You only hear about the stupid ones.

Great comeback!!! :lol:

  • 07/17/07 Returned from two months in China. All K1 documents 'in hand'.
  • 07/19/07 Completed preparation of I-129F & associated documentation. Mailed it.
  • 08/03/07 Received NOA1 from the CSC.
  • 12/13/07 Received NOA2 from the CSC.
  • 01/23/08 NVC sent our case to U.S. Consulate in Guangzhou China.
  • 03/31/08 U.S. Consulate in Guangzhou China received, issued case number.
  • 04/05/08 P3 received.
  • 04/06/08 P3 sent.
  • 05/01/08 P4 received.
  • 05/12/08 Flight to China.
  • 06/23/08 Interview at U.S. Consulate in Guangzhou China- PINK.
  • 06/25/08 K1 & K2 visas received.
  • 07/09/08 We all arrive in America, Chicago POE
  • 08/06/08 Fiancee receives SSN (req. for marriage in our state)
  • 08/08/08 Married
  • 09/01/08 Moved into new house. AR-11's filed for wife & son.
  • 09/19/08 AOS / EAD package mailed.
  • 09/25/08 AOS / EAD NOAs.
  • 10/02/08 Biometrics letters.
  • 10/16/08 Biometrics taken.
  • 10/17/08 Case transferred to CSC.
  • 12/08/08 EADs approved / EAD cards issued.
  • 03/05/09 AOS approved.
  • 03/12/09 Green Cards received.
  • 09/17/10 Application for Lifting Conditions Mailed.
  • 10/04/10 NOA1
  • 10/19/10 Biometrics Taken.
  • 01/07/11 Removal of Conditions Approved
  • 02/26/12 Still Happily Married & Doing Well

4983700_bodyshot_300x400.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
but it's on par (imo) with a well off older man marrying a young, gorgeous woman from an impoverished nation. They may not love each other, but they both mutually benefit from the marriage.

The stereotype couple you described are NOT committing marriage fraud as they intend to stay married. ...and who is to quanitify whether any couple here 'loves' each other beyond the evidence to support a bonafide marriage to immigration?

I'm not quantifying whether people 'love' each other or not...since love is not a prereq to a 'bonafide' marriage in the eyes of USCIS, it's superfluous to this conversation. I wasn't implying that so and so doesn't love each other.....I'm just saying that with an IMB, surely the non-foreign SO looking for 'an American' is doing so at least partially for immi benefit.

This particular story was blatant, and yes, morally wrong as there's money being exchanged. But at the same time, all I'm saying is I see some shades of grey.

But why does an inability to communicate in the same language preclude natural attraction and attactment developing between two people? The universal language is spoken worldwide! :)

"diaddie mermaid"

You can 'catch' me on here and on FBI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...