Meet the women who won't have babies - because they're not eco friendly

[GaryC 7]

Had Toni Vernelli gone ahead with her pregnancy ten years ago, she would know at first hand what it is like to cradle her own baby, to have a pair of innocent eyes gazing up at her with unconditional love, to feel a little hand slipping into hers - and a voice calling her Mummy.

But the very thought makes her shudder with horror.

Because when Toni terminated her pregnancy, she did so in the firm belief she was helping to save the planet.

Incredibly, so determined was she that the terrible "mistake" of pregnancy should never happen again, that she begged the doctor who performed the abortion to sterilise her at the same time.

He refused, but Toni - who works for an environmental charity - "relentlessly hunted down a doctor who would perform the irreversible surgery.

Finally, eight years ago, Toni got her way.

At the age of 27 this young woman at the height of her reproductive years was sterilised to "protect the planet".

Incredibly, instead of mourning the loss of a family that never was, her boyfriend (now husband) presented her with a congratulations card.

While some might think it strange to celebrate the reversal of nature and denial of motherhood, Toni relishes her decision with an almost religious zeal.

"Having children is selfish. It's all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet," says Toni, 35.

"Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil fuels, more trees and produces more rubbish, more pollution, more greenhouse gases, and adds to the problem of over-population."

While most parents view their children as the ultimate miracle of nature, Toni seems to see them as a sinister threat to the future.

It's an extreme stance which one might imagine is born from an unhappy childhood or an upbringing among parents who share similar, strong beliefs.

But nothing in Toni's safe, middle- class upbringing gave any clues as to the views which would shape her adult life. The eldest of three daughters, she enjoyed a loving, close-knit family life.

She excelled at her Roman Catholic school, and her doting parents fully expected her to grow up, settle down and start a family of her own.

"When I finished school, I got a job in retail and at 19, I met my first husband," says Toni.

"No sooner had we finished our wedding cake than all our relatives started to ask when they could expect a new addition to the family.

"I always told them that would never happen, but no one listened.

"When I was a child, I loved bird-watching, and in my teens that developed into a passion for the environment as well as the welfare of animals - I became a vegetarian when I was 15.

"Even my parents used to smile and say: 'You'll change your mind one day about babies.'

"The only person who understood how I felt was my first husband, who didn't want children either.

"We both passionately wanted to save the planet - not produce a new life which would only add to the problem."

So, instead of mapping out plans for a family, Toni and her husband began discussing medical options to ensure they would never reproduce.

Toni, from Taunton, Somerset, says: "When I was 21, I considered sterilisation for the first time.

"I'd been on the Pill for five years and didn't want to take hormone-based contraception indefinitely.

"I went to my GP, but she wouldn't even consider the idea.

"She said I was far too young and told me I could 'absolutely not' be sterilised, and that I was bound to change my mind one day.

"I found her attitude frustrating.

"We decided my husband would have a vasectomy instead. He was 25, just a few years older than me, but the GP allowed him to go ahead.

"I found it insulting that she thought that, just because I was a woman, I'd reach a point where an urge to breed would overcome all rational thought."

When Toni was 23, her marriage ended. She says: "We married very young and grew apart."

Toni found herself young, single and with a new life in London, working for an environmental charity.

But while other young women dream of marriage and babies, Toni was convinced it was her duty not to have a child.

She claims she was far from alone.

"Through my job I made many friends who, like me, were more interested in campaigning, trying to change society and save the planet rather than having families of our own.

"We used to say that if ever we did want children, we'd adopt, as there are so many children in need of a loving family.

"At least then, we'd be doing something positive for the world, rather than something negative."

Toni was happy, at last, with fellow environmentalists who shared her philosophy. But when she was 25, disaster struck.

"I discovered that despite taking the Pill, I'd accidentally fallen pregnant by my boyfriend.

"I was horrified. I knew straight away there was no option of having the baby.

"I went to my doctor about having a termination, and asked if I could be sterilised at the same time.

"This time it was a male doctor. I remember saying to him: 'I want to make sure this never happens again.'

"He said: 'You may not want a child, but one day you may meet a man who does'. He refused to consider it.

"I didn't like having a termination, but it would have been immoral to give birth to a child that I felt strongly would only be a burden to the world.

"I've never felt a twinge of guilt about what I did, and have honestly never wondered what might have been.

"After my abortion, I was more determined than ever to pursue sterilisation.

"By then, I had my mother's support - she realised I wasn't going to grow out of my beliefs, and was proud of my campaigning work."

At the age of 27, Toni moved to Brighton, where her dream of medical intervention was realised.

Toni says: "My new GP was more forward-thinking and referred me to hospital. I couldn't wait for the operation."

As Toni awaited the surgery which would destroy her fertility, she met her future husband, Ed, 38, an IT consultant.

"A week before my sterilisation, I went to an animal rights demonstration and met Ed.

"I liked him immediately, and I told him what I was doing straight away - because if he wanted children then he needed to know I wasn't the woman for him," she says.

"But Ed was relieved when I told him how I felt and said he didn't want children for the same reasons."

On the morning of surgery, Ed gave Toni a card saying "Congratulations".

Toni says: "After the operation, which is irreversible, I didn't feel emotional - just relieved.

"I've never doubted that I made the right decision. Ed and I married in September 2002, and have a much nicer lifestyle as a result of not having children.

"We love walking and hiking, and we often go away for weekends.

"Every year, we also take a nice holiday - we've just come back from South Africa.

"We feel we can have one long-haul flight a year, as we are vegan and childless, thereby greatly reducing our carbon footprint and combating over-population.

"My only frustration is that other people are unable to accept my decision.

"When I tell people why I don't want children, they look at me as if I was planning to commit murder.

"A woman who does not have maternal-feelings is seen as some sort of anomaly.

"And a woman like me, who is not having children in order to save the planet, is considered barking mad.

"What I consider mad are those women who ferry their children short distances in gas-guzzling cars."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/fema...in_page_id=1879

[JODO 2]

If everyone were meant to have babies, we would not have abused, neglected and or orphan kids. Some people really are doing humanity a favor by not breeding. Just because one can, does not mean one should.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

If everyone were meant to have babies, we would not have abused, neglected and or orphan kids. Some people really are doing humanity a favor by not breeding. Just because one can, does not mean one should.

I agree, although I think this woman's reason was lame. Overconsumption is destroying this planet...not population growth, IMO.

[JODO 2]

If everyone were meant to have babies, we would not have abused, neglected and or orphan kids. Some people really are doing humanity a favor by not breeding. Just because one can, does not mean one should.

I agree, although I think this woman's reason was lame. Overconsumption is destroying this planet...not population growth, IMO.

Sure her reason seems silly to me as well,but it may not have a bad result.

[russ 1]

If everyone were meant to have babies, we would not have abused, neglected and or orphan kids. Some people really are doing humanity a favor by not breeding. Just because one can, does not mean one should.

That's right - we would all enjoy the world much more if none of us were here.

Instead of working for an environmental charity, why not do something that would actually help the planet?

Like get an engineering degree and do research in energy. (Most of engineering is about improving efficiency and saftey...) Oh wait, that would be hard. Much easier to just say that man is to blame for everything.

Environmentalists don't care about saving the planet. They never have.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Environmentalists don't care about saving the planet. They never have.

Let's not lump them all into one stereotype.

[Heracles 417]

If everyone were meant to have babies, we would not have abused, neglected and or orphan kids. Some people really are doing humanity a favor by not breeding. Just because one can, does not mean one should.

That's right - we would all enjoy the world much more if none of us were here.

Instead of working for an environmental charity, why not do something that would actually help the planet?

Like get an engineering degree and do research in energy. (Most of engineering is about improving efficiency and saftey...) Oh wait, that would be hard. Much easier to just say that man is to blame for everything.

Environmentalists don't care about saving the planet. They never have.

Well said. They should be coming up with solutions rather than throwing out rhetoric. Sick of oil. Then use common sense with a bit of brain power and come up with a solution to eliminate its use rather than simply protesting.

Anyway, protesting and blogging only adds to the so-called "carbon footprint" and is not "eco-friendly".

Edited November 27, 2007 by Boo-Yah!

[natty bumppo 297]

If everyone were meant to have babies, we would not have abused, neglected and or orphan kids. Some people really are doing humanity a favor by not breeding. Just because one can, does not mean one should.

I agree, although I think this woman's reason was lame. Overconsumption is destroying this planet...not population growth, IMO.

At the moment these are tied together ... more people means more consumption ....

[one...two...tree 2,762]

If everyone were meant to have babies, we would not have abused, neglected and or orphan kids. Some people really are doing humanity a favor by not breeding. Just because one can, does not mean one should.

I agree, although I think this woman's reason was lame. Overconsumption is destroying this planet...not population growth, IMO.

At the moment these are tied together ... more people means more consumption ....

Not necessarily. A family of 6 in Somalia is most probably using up less non-renewable resources and adding less pollution than a couple with no children living here in the U.S.

[natty bumppo 297]

If everyone were meant to have babies, we would not have abused, neglected and or orphan kids. Some people really are doing humanity a favor by not breeding. Just because one can, does not mean one should.

I agree, although I think this woman's reason was lame. Overconsumption is destroying this planet...not population growth, IMO.

At the moment these are tied together ... more people means more consumption ....

Not necessarily. A family of 6 in Somalia is most probably using up less non-renewable resources and adding less pollution than a couple with no children living here in the U.S.

the point is consumption ... more people = more consumption ... doesn't matter where the people are located.

(let's just ... for discussion say ... the family of 6 just adds one more person ... and consumption doesn't increase ?)

[MaRob 0]

"I didn't like having a termination, but it would have been immoral to give birth to a child that I felt strongly would only be a burden to the world.

Ok.. I am not trying to get into the whole abortion debate, but this statement just dumbfounded me... i really am speechless... she's trying so hard to save the whales that she kills her children...

[Ban Hammer 13,643]

"I didn't like having a termination, but it would have been immoral to give birth to a child that I felt strongly would only be a burden to the world.

Ok.. I am not trying to get into the whole abortion debate, but this statement just dumbfounded me... i really am speechless... she's trying so hard to save the whales that she kills her children...

amen. liberals think in mysterious ways.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

If everyone were meant to have babies, we would not have abused, neglected and or orphan kids. Some people really are doing humanity a favor by not breeding. Just because one can, does not mean one should.

I agree, although I think this woman's reason was lame. Overconsumption is destroying this planet...not population growth, IMO.

At the moment these are tied together ... more people means more consumption ....

Not necessarily. A family of 6 in Somalia is most probably using up less non-renewable resources and adding less pollution than a couple with no children living here in the U.S.

the point is consumption ... more people = more consumption ... doesn't matter where the people are located.

(let's just ... for discussion say ... the family of 6 just adds one more person ... and consumption doesn't increase ?)

Natty, if I own 2 small economy cars and go through a total of 20 gallons a week combined, and you own 1 large SUV that goes through 40 gallons a week, who is consuming more gas?

[yassmine2878 1]

"Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil fuels, more trees and produces more rubbish, more pollution, more greenhouse gases, and adds to the problem of over-population."

And she's exempt from this? I can understand the whole 'more people use more stuff' line of thinking, but by existing, she's going against the very thing she's so adamant about: human beings sucking the earth of natural resources. If she's so gung ho, why doesnt she go toss herself in a hole and lump dirt on? Coupla million years and she will have replenished those lovely fossil fuels she used up in the normal course of her life and the whole thing's a wash. Be an environmentalist if you want. Dont have kids if you dont want them. There's nothing horribly abnormal about either choice, so why go to the trouble to make up hogwash excuses to justify them?

[pedroh 21]

If everyone were meant to have babies, we would not have abused, neglected and or orphan kids. Some people really are doing humanity a favor by not breeding. Just because one can, does not mean one should.

I agree, although I think this woman's reason was lame. Overconsumption is destroying this planet...not population growth, IMO.

At the moment these are tied together ... more people means more consumption ....

Not necessarily. A family of 6 in Somalia is most probably using up less non-renewable resources and adding less pollution than a couple with no children living here in the U.S.

the point is consumption ... more people = more consumption ... doesn't matter where the people are located.

(let's just ... for discussion say ... the family of 6 just adds one more person ... and consumption doesn't increase ?)

probably not.. the family in somalia could probably live with 2 pounds of something a week, while a couple no kids in other country could consume 10 pounds of the same..

overconsumption is not related to more population..

Edited November 27, 2007 by pedroh