Jump to content
one...two...tree

Protections for home-loan borrowers OKd

 Share

1 post in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

By Jonathan Peterson, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

The House approves restrictions on lenders that the president and the mortgage industry oppose. The measure's future in the Senate is unclear.

WASHINGTON -- Seeking to prevent a repeat of the current mortgage crisis, the House today approved a sweeping set of protections for home-loan borrowers.

The legislation, which would fill in a perceived gap in regulation, is intended to end some of the practices blamed for recent excesses in the lending and housing markets, especially the marketing of loans to people who couldn't afford them.

"This is an important and urgent and critical bill," said Rep. David Scott (D-Ga.), reflecting a growing political appetite for responding to the continuing mortgage debacle.

The bill would bar a lender from making a loan unless the borrower had a reasonable ability to repay it, would make clear that federal standards apply to all lenders, including mortgage brokers, and would require licensing and registration for brokers and bank loan officers.

The Democratic-sponsored bill was approved 291 to 127. It gained substantial Republican support, though most of the opposition also came from that party. The measure is opposed by the White House and much of the mortgage industry.

Calling the legislation "the first step toward reforms for the future," Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.) said it struck a proper balance by protecting consumers without restricting the availability of credit.

But opponents said the bill would limit the availability of credit by hobbling lenders with red tape and filling them with a fear of running afoul of regulators or getting sued by borrowers.

Rep. Ed Royce (R-Fullerton) said the bill relied too heavily on words such as "appropriate" and "ability to repay" that could be interpreted in various ways, confusing lenders and making the law difficult to enforce.

"This kind of murky language would invite litigation from every borrower who misses a payment," Royce said.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-mort...=la-home-center

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...