Oklahoma targets illegal immigrants with tough new law

[Fandango 1,439]

Well, I wouldn't call him 'bully', but other than that, I agree with Dev yet again. Being that she didn't mention SSNs, it's a moot response to what she actually did say.

That's it, I'm going to bed...I'm skeered now.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Was I talking to you? Sure wasn't.

And it completely invalidates the argument I was debating anyhow, as IT WAS NEVER MENTIONED.

I don't care whether you were talking to me or not - public forum and all that

Whether you want to acknowledge it or not - she is right about Social Security Numbers and the legal designation of "residency" as it applies to different visa classifications.

I am well aware of what a public forum is. It doesn't mean you have to reply to every single post anyone makes that dares go against you.

And I REPEAT - for those of you who are reading comprehension challenged here on VJ - she replied to me, yet nowhere did I mention SSNs AT ALL, let alone as proof of residency.

You just can't stay out of any debate, can you? What a bully.

Really? I ain't the one displaying the hostile, pissy attitude each time someone (anyone) replies to one of my posts. Then again it could be that I'm just a bit better at keeping my temper I knew there much be some reason why in 4 years I have not once, ever been banned - and you're on what... your 3rd? 4th?

As I said earlier - when you trap off like this it makes it rather difficult to engage in any sort of civilized discussion, but there you go. And here we are.

[no name 1]

Was I talking to you? Sure wasn't.

And it completely invalidates the argument I was debating anyhow, as IT WAS NEVER MENTIONED.

I don't care whether you were talking to me or not - public forum and all that

Whether you want to acknowledge it or not - she is right about Social Security Numbers and the legal designation of "residency" as it applies to different visa classifications.

I am well aware of what a public forum is. It doesn't mean you have to reply to every single post anyone makes that dares go against you.

And I REPEAT - for those of you who are reading comprehension challenged here on VJ - she replied to me, yet nowhere did I mention SSNs AT ALL, let alone as proof of residency.

You just can't stay out of any debate, can you? What a bully.

Really? I ain't the one displaying the hostile, pissy attitude each time someone (anyone) replies to one of my posts. Then again it could be that I'm just a bit better at keeping my temper I knew there much be some reason why in 4 years I have not once, ever been banned - and you're on what... your 3rd? 4th?

As I said earlier - when you trap off like this it makes it rather difficult to engage in any sort of civilized discussion, but there you go. And here we are.

Actually, never rightfully so. But I'm not sure you can see down below your pedestal.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

The ACLU is really the ICLU - Illegal Civil Liberties Union. They have yet to move to protect national sovereignty or the distinction between legals and illegals, instead they work to destroy American citizen's rights. They are open borders traitors.

Meanwhile they are working every day to ensure that you have the right to say just that about them and about anybody else you desire with impunity.

No, they don't. The right to free speech doesn't come from the ICLU; it's a divine right from God, according to the US Constitution. They can't stop me from saying whatever I want about them, and they can't protect me either. They have swung too far to the left.

The ICLU can't even get the terminology correct when it comes to illegal v. legal immigrants. It slants the debate by refusing a distinction, then runs to the courts to undermine laws that would uphold that distinction. They are an anathma to civil rights because they have become too leftist to do the job of leveling the playing field anymore.