Jump to content
ron schwar

Help approval received from CA but ????

By ron schwar in K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Case Filing and Progress Reports

 Share

8 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

ron schwar Rookie

ron schwar   0

Posted
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
 Timeline
Posted

I received an approval from California on a K-1 fiance visa , BUT it said on the Approval it was being sent directly to the consulate not the NVC !!!!!! Has Anyone seen this before???

We had to expedite the visa do to health reasons, but I do not think this is the reason.

I do not see on the approval from CA. that it is going to the NVC Anyone out there get an approval with it saying being sent directly to the consulate ???? for us that would be Manila

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kellyc Contributor

kellyc   0

Posted
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: South Africa
 Timeline
Posted
I received an approval from California on a K-1 fiance visa , BUT it said on the Approval it was being sent directly to the consulate not the NVC !!!!!! Has Anyone seen this before???

We had to expedite the visa do to health reasons, but I do not think this is the reason.

I do not see on the approval from CA. that it is going to the NVC Anyone out there get an approval with it saying being sent directly to the consulate ???? for us that would be Manila

Never heard of such a thing, but it sounds good to me! Yeah to no NVC! I am curious to know what qualifies as a health reason for an expedite. Is that a health reason for the petitioner or beneficiary, or sickness in the family, parents being very ill, etc.?

There is a time for everything....all in God's time.

3-11-06: Met online

4-4-07: Engaged:)

5-31-07: K-1 package mailed

6-5-07: Signature of receipt at TSC

6-12-07: NOA1 notice mailed from CSC

6-15-07: Check clears bank

6-16-07: Bank shows that check has been cashed.

6-18-07: Obtained receipt number off the back of the check and registered on the USCIS site

6-18-07: USCIS portfolio states packet received at CSC on June 12 and notice has been mailed

7-12-07: Touch due to phone call to USCIS

7-16-07: Received NOA1 hardcopy

9-25-07: Called USCIS

9-26-07: Touch-probably due to phone call yesterday

10-29-07: NOA2!!

10-30-07: Touch

10-31-07: Touch

11-1-07: Touch

11-11-07: Touch

12-28-07: Medical

2-19-08: Interview date- Passed!

4-26-08: US entry in Dallas, Texas

5-17-08: Wedding date--Finally Married!

3dflagsdotcom_safri_2fawm.gifJonathan and Kelly 3dflagsdotcom_usa_2fawm.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ovaltine Jenkins Proficient

Ovaltine Jenkins   5

Posted
Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: Czech Republic
 Timeline
Posted

I have heard something like this but I think those people still received a letter or something from NVC so although they were told it went straight to the Embassy I think it went through NVC anyway....but not sure...

I looked at your timeline and it doesn´t look like your petition was expedited...it says your approval took 164 days...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
em79sugar Explorer

em79sugar   1

Posted
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Sweden
 Timeline
Posted
I have heard something like this but I think those people still received a letter or something from NVC so although they were told it went straight to the Embassy I think it went through NVC anyway....but not sure...

I looked at your timeline and it doesn´t look like your petition was expedited...it says your approval took 164 days...

Maybe expedition only applies once the service center approves it, then that is why it is sent directly to the consulate. The other possible issue is that someone left a thread earlier in the week that said they heard there was a back up getting approved apps to the NVC do to contractor problems. Maybe this is their solution to bypass NVC all together?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zee Bee Grand Master

Zee Bee   61

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ghana
 Timeline
Posted

All NOA2's have that wording (I just checked mine and we made a stop at NVC).

Mama to 2 beautiful boys (August 2011 and January 2015)

Click for full timeline

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bill B Collaborator

Bill B   0

Posted
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
 Timeline
Posted (edited)
I received an approval from California on a K-1 fiance visa , BUT it said on the Approval it was being sent directly to the consulate not the NVC !!!!!! Has Anyone seen this before???

We had to expedite the visa do to health reasons, but I do not think this is the reason.

I do not see on the approval from CA. that it is going to the NVC Anyone out there get an approval with it saying being sent directly to the consulate ???? for us that would be Manila

Oops, I see Zee answered this to clarify it well. Thanks, Zee. I just removed my response and put this in place. Good luck with the rest of the journey.

Edited by Bill B
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jasman0717 Grand Master

Jasman0717   9

Posted
Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Philippines
 Timeline
Posted

The NVC assigns the case number for Manila. The case number should start with MNL.....i.e. MNL2007501001. It would be kind of hard to have the petition go to the embassy without a case number.

usa_fl_sm_nwm.gifphilippines_fl_md_clr.gif

United States & Republic of the Philippines

"Life is hard; it's harder if you're stupid." John Wayne

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...