What are the chances if I am HIV+

[libyloba 0]

Come on Mags, you're not an AUGUST FILER, maybe it's different then.

Come on Caldan? Why have a medical exam and check for those type of diseases for if it ok? It is very sad and tragic unexpected event for someone, but they need to be realistic.

Look, be it wrong or right, realistic or not... there is no room for anyone to steal the hopes of another, even if their hopes are little in your opinion.

None of us have a right to lay down a definitive answer to how USCIS will proceed and that is the only fact here.

There are few people in Visa Journey that offer lost hope to others... don't be among that breed...

Like I said, be realistic and get real. It is truly sad, unfortunate and tragic, may God heal this person, but it is the law and the rules of USCIS on this matter. And you need to stop and think, why even bother having a medical exam for then if it is all ok to come to USA with anytime of disease or affliction to expose the rest of the US population with, the reality is it is not and face it CDC in USA along with USCIS has very good reasons for these medical exams, and to sit here and act like a person's chances of getting a visa to the USA under those aforementioned medical conditions are not being realistic nor is thinking a waiver is under these conditions, if there is some alternative to getting a visa then so be it, but chances are very slim under the conditions expressed, this in no way is dashing anyone's hopes it is giving an honest answer based on USCIS policy and rules, which I remind you as cruel and harsh as they seem, I did not write them, but they are what they are, it affects all of us here in the USA - think about it there is a reason for these rules, it is truly a sad and unfortunate turn of events, may God be with them.

Your comment is inappropriate . The chances may be slim but not impossible.

A quote from one of my favorite poem from Emily Dickinson:

"Hope" is the thing with feathers

That perches in the soul

And sings the tune without the words

And never stops at all."

I thought it was relevant to your pessimism outtake . NEVER STOP HOPPING!!!!!

[payxibka 10,045]

If you are going to lay the "smackdown" then get your facts straight...

In this particular situation, the OP is already here so there is no GETTING a visa and coming to the USA .... The facts and circumstances presented by the OP provides an ability to resolve with the acquisition of a waiver...

Like I said, be realistic and get real. It is truly sad, unfortunate and tragic, may God heal this person, but it is the law and the rules of USCIS on this matter. And you need to stop and think, why even bother having a medical exam for then if it is all ok to come to USA with anytime of disease or affliction to expose the rest of the US population with, the reality is it is not and face it CDC in USA along with USCIS has very good reasons for these medical exams, and to sit here and act like a person's chances of getting a visa to the USA under those aforementioned medical conditions are not being realistic nor is thinking a waiver is under these conditions, if there is some alternative to getting a visa then so be it, but chances are very slim under the conditions expressed, this in no way is dashing anyone's hopes it is giving an honest answer based on USCIS policy and rules, which I remind you as cruel and harsh as they seem, I did not write them, but they are what they are, it affects all of us here in the USA - think about it there is a reason for these rules, it is truly a sad and unfortunate turn of events, may God be with them.

[florida_guy07 0]

Come on Mags, you're not an AUGUST FILER, maybe it's different then.

Come on Caldan? Why have a medical exam and check for those type of diseases for if it ok? It is very sad and tragic unexpected event for someone, but they need to be realistic.

Look, be it wrong or right, realistic or not... there is no room for anyone to steal the hopes of another, even if their hopes are little in your opinion.

None of us have a right to lay down a definitive answer to how USCIS will proceed and that is the only fact here.

There are few people in Visa Journey that offer lost hope to others... don't be among that breed...

Like I said, be realistic and get real. It is truly sad, unfortunate and tragic, may God heal this person, but it is the law and the rules of USCIS on this matter. And you need to stop and think, why even bother having a medical exam for then if it is all ok to come to USA with anytime of disease or affliction to expose the rest of the US population with, the reality is it is not and face it CDC in USA along with USCIS has very good reasons for these medical exams, and to sit here and act like a person's chances of getting a visa to the USA under those aforementioned medical conditions are not being realistic nor is thinking a waiver is under these conditions, if there is some alternative to getting a visa then so be it, but chances are very slim under the conditions expressed, this in no way is dashing anyone's hopes it is giving an honest answer based on USCIS policy and rules, which I remind you as cruel and harsh as they seem, I did not write them, but they are what they are, it affects all of us here in the USA - think about it there is a reason for these rules, it is truly a sad and unfortunate turn of events, may God be with them.

There is a difference between being realistic and being cruel and your: "It will be denied" post was cruel and far from being realistic.

You don't know what you are talking about, the OP doesn't need a visa for anything. Get your facts straight...

[zqt3344 21]

If you are going to lay the "smackdown" then get your facts straight...

In this particular situation, the OP is already here so there is no GETTING a visa and coming to the USA .... The facts and circumstances presented by the OP provides an ability to resolve with the acquisition of a waiver...

Like I said, be realistic and get real. It is truly sad, unfortunate and tragic, may God heal this person, but it is the law and the rules of USCIS on this matter. And you need to stop and think, why even bother having a medical exam for then if it is all ok to come to USA with anytime of disease or affliction to expose the rest of the US population with, the reality is it is not and face it CDC in USA along with USCIS has very good reasons for these medical exams, and to sit here and act like a person's chances of getting a visa to the USA under those aforementioned medical conditions are not being realistic nor is thinking a waiver is under these conditions, if there is some alternative to getting a visa then so be it, but chances are very slim under the conditions expressed, this in no way is dashing anyone's hopes it is giving an honest answer based on USCIS policy and rules, which I remind you as cruel and harsh as they seem, I did not write them, but they are what they are, it affects all of us here in the USA - think about it there is a reason for these rules, it is truly a sad and unfortunate turn of events, may God be with them.

Thank you God for with out you how would we do it!

[zqt3344 21]

If you are going to lay the "smackdown" then get your facts straight...

In this particular situation, the OP is already here so there is no GETTING a visa and coming to the USA .... The facts and circumstances presented by the OP provides an ability to resolve with the acquisition of a waiver...

Like I said, be realistic and get real. It is truly sad, unfortunate and tragic, may God heal this person, but it is the law and the rules of USCIS on this matter. And you need to stop and think, why even bother having a medical exam for then if it is all ok to come to USA with anytime of disease or affliction to expose the rest of the US population with, the reality is it is not and face it CDC in USA along with USCIS has very good reasons for these medical exams, and to sit here and act like a person's chances of getting a visa to the USA under those aforementioned medical conditions are not being realistic nor is thinking a waiver is under these conditions, if there is some alternative to getting a visa then so be it, but chances are very slim under the conditions expressed, this in no way is dashing anyone's hopes it is giving an honest answer based on USCIS policy and rules, which I remind you as cruel and harsh as they seem, I did not write them, but they are what they are, it affects all of us here in the USA - think about it there is a reason for these rules, it is truly a sad and unfortunate turn of events, may God be with them.

FWA GUY here are your facts for you below, get real and smack down this below. No where does it guarantee a waiver, thus chances are slim and it is clear on the HIV ban. And I always base my thoughts on facts.

Entering the U.S. With HIV/AIDS

Two major sets of rules prevent non-citizens from entering or staying in the U.S.: inadmissibility and deportability. HIV is not a ground of deportability, but it is a ground of inadmissibility. This means that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can "remove" someone from the U.S. for HIV only if the person entered without government permission. The DHS cannot deport someone for becoming HIV-positive, or for having an AIDS diagnosis, if that person entered on a valid visa or now has lawful permanent residence (a green card).

But the DHS does bar many people living with HIV from entering the country. This includes temporary visitors, such as tourists, students, workers, and those who intend to live in the U.S. permanently. There is another potential barrier for many HIV-positive non-citizens: the "public charge" ground, a concept in immigration law which refers to individuals who cannot support themselves and depend on public benefits for income.

People with HIV may qualify for a special "exception," also known as a discretionary waiver. (The waiver is "discretionary" because the government is not required to approve it.) Several different waivers exist, depending on whether the individual is seeking to enter the U.S. temporarily or permanently, or is fleeing persecution. These waivers share an important characteristic: applying for one will lengthen the processing time and increase the red tape of any application. (This description covers several common waivers, but is not completely comprehensive and is not intended as legal advice.)

Waivers for Visitors under INA §212(d)(3)

Since 1989, the government has allowed people with HIV to enter the U.S. for certain purposes, such as to attend a conference, conduct business, visit close relatives, or receive medical treatment. Agents are instructed to provide waivers to those non-immigrants "who establish that their entry in the United States would confer a public benefit which outweighs any risk to the public health." This waiver is good only for short visits of less than 30 days.

In 1990, the first Bush administration added a second kind of waiver. This waiver allows the State Department to grant blanket 10-day visas under certain circumstances to persons attending a professional, scientific, or academic conference in the United States. These visas do not require an applicant to declare his or her HIV status.

Many people ask how the DHS would become aware that a non-citizen has HIV. Although the DHS does not test visitors for HIV when they try to enter the U.S., everyone who is not a U.S. citizen or permanent resident must obtain a visa to enter legally. People coming to the U.S. for study, work, or a visit must fill out a "non-immigrant" visa application, which asks, "Have you ever been afflicted with a communicable disease of public health significance?" "Infection with the etiologic agent for acquired immune deficiency syndrome" is specifically listed in U.S. immigration law as a "communicable disease of public health significance." If an HIV-positive non-citizen knows that HIV/AIDS qualifies as such a disease and checks "no" on the visa application, the DHS may deny the application based on fraud if an agent has reason to suspect HIV/AIDS, such as medication found in luggage. The DHS may also turn away anyone who answers "yes" to this question, unless he or she qualifies for a discretionary waiver. To avoid these problems, non-immigrant visa applicants may request in advance a special waiver for visitors. HIV waivers are not easy to obtain and may result in processing delays or denial.

Waivers for Immigrants under INA §212(g)

Since December 1, 1987, all immigrant visa applicants 15 years or older have been required to submit to HIV testing. Applicants under 15 are also subject to testing if there is reason to suspect they may have HIV (such as hemophilia or an HIV-positive parent). But a waiver may be available to people with HIV who have certain family relationships. The individual must be the (opposite sex) spouse, parent or unmarried son or daughter of a U.S. citizen, permanent resident, or person issued an immigrant visa. There is one special exception to the "family member" requirement, and that exception applies to certain HIV-positive survivors of domestic violence.

Having the requisite family relationship or qualifying for the domestic violence exception is not enough on its own to obtain this waiver. Applicants must also meet a rigorous series of standards. One standard that must be overcome is the likelihood of the applicant becoming a "public charge." This ground is designed to prevent non-citizens from becoming dependent on the U.S. government for economic support if, for example, prolonged hospitalization or extensive medical care becomes necessary. Applicants must show they have the necessary means and capability to deal with a potential high-cost health situation.

Moreover, applicants with HIV must pass an "extra test," which does not appear anywhere in immigration law. They must also show: (1) that the danger to U.S. public health created by the applicant's admission is minimal; (2) that the possibility of the spread of HIV created by admission is minimal; and (3) that there will be no cost incurred by any level of U.S. government agency without the prior consent of that agency.

Once a 212(g) waiver is granted, it will remain in effect as long as it has not been revoked, no new grounds of inadmissibility have arisen, and the applicant is complying with the original conditions specified in the waiver. HIV waivers are not easy to obtain, however, and may result in processing delays or denial.

Waivers for Refugees and Asylum Seekers Under INA §209©

Regardless of HIV status, those that fear persecution in their home countries because of race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or social group are eligible to apply for asylum (if currently in the U.S.) or refugee status (if abroad). People seeking asylum do not need to apply for an HIV waiver, but those seeking "refugee status" abroad must obtain an HIV waiver. Non-citizens granted asylum, however, may later seek permanent residence and, at that time, must request a waiver.

No family relationship with a citizen or permanent resident is required for the refugee/asylum waiver. Instead, applicants must prove that they merit a discretionary waiver for humanitarian purposes, to assure family unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest. Refugees and asylum seekers are also exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility, but they are regularly subjected to the government's three-pronged "extra test" aimed at persons living with HIV. Encouragingly, in 1999, immigration authorities issued special guidance regarding HIV-positive refugees to make it easier for them to meet the "extra test."

[Singers 0]

Visit immigrate2us.net

They have a couple of members with HIV waivers approved. (Proof that it is not impossible.)

The members there are usually very helpful.

[florida_guy07 0]

If you are going to lay the "smackdown" then get your facts straight...

In this particular situation, the OP is already here so there is no GETTING a visa and coming to the USA .... The facts and circumstances presented by the OP provides an ability to resolve with the acquisition of a waiver...

Like I said, be realistic and get real. It is truly sad, unfortunate and tragic, may God heal this person, but it is the law and the rules of USCIS on this matter. And you need to stop and think, why even bother having a medical exam for then if it is all ok to come to USA with anytime of disease or affliction to expose the rest of the US population with, the reality is it is not and face it CDC in USA along with USCIS has very good reasons for these medical exams, and to sit here and act like a person's chances of getting a visa to the USA under those aforementioned medical conditions are not being realistic nor is thinking a waiver is under these conditions, if there is some alternative to getting a visa then so be it, but chances are very slim under the conditions expressed, this in no way is dashing anyone's hopes it is giving an honest answer based on USCIS policy and rules, which I remind you as cruel and harsh as they seem, I did not write them, but they are what they are, it affects all of us here in the USA - think about it there is a reason for these rules, it is truly a sad and unfortunate turn of events, may God be with them.

FWA GUY here are your facts for you below, get real and smack down this below. No where does it guarantee a waiver, thus chances are slim and it is clear on the HIV ban. And I always base my thoughts on facts.

Entering the U.S. With HIV/AIDS

Two major sets of rules prevent non-citizens from entering or staying in the U.S.: inadmissibility and deportability. HIV is not a ground of deportability, but it is a ground of inadmissibility. This means that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can "remove" someone from the U.S. for HIV only if the person entered without government permission. The DHS cannot deport someone for becoming HIV-positive, or for having an AIDS diagnosis, if that person entered on a valid visa or now has lawful permanent residence (a green card).

But the DHS does bar many people living with HIV from entering the country. This includes temporary visitors, such as tourists, students, workers, and those who intend to live in the U.S. permanently. There is another potential barrier for many HIV-positive non-citizens: the "public charge" ground, a concept in immigration law which refers to individuals who cannot support themselves and depend on public benefits for income.

People with HIV may qualify for a special "exception," also known as a discretionary waiver. (The waiver is "discretionary" because the government is not required to approve it.) Several different waivers exist, depending on whether the individual is seeking to enter the U.S. temporarily or permanently, or is fleeing persecution. These waivers share an important characteristic: applying for one will lengthen the processing time and increase the red tape of any application. (This description covers several common waivers, but is not completely comprehensive and is not intended as legal advice.)

Waivers for Visitors under INA §212(d)(3)

Since 1989, the government has allowed people with HIV to enter the U.S. for certain purposes, such as to attend a conference, conduct business, visit close relatives, or receive medical treatment. Agents are instructed to provide waivers to those non-immigrants "who establish that their entry in the United States would confer a public benefit which outweighs any risk to the public health." This waiver is good only for short visits of less than 30 days.

In 1990, the first Bush administration added a second kind of waiver. This waiver allows the State Department to grant blanket 10-day visas under certain circumstances to persons attending a professional, scientific, or academic conference in the United States. These visas do not require an applicant to declare his or her HIV status.

Many people ask how the DHS would become aware that a non-citizen has HIV. Although the DHS does not test visitors for HIV when they try to enter the U.S., everyone who is not a U.S. citizen or permanent resident must obtain a visa to enter legally. People coming to the U.S. for study, work, or a visit must fill out a "non-immigrant" visa application, which asks, "Have you ever been afflicted with a communicable disease of public health significance?" "Infection with the etiologic agent for acquired immune deficiency syndrome" is specifically listed in U.S. immigration law as a "communicable disease of public health significance." If an HIV-positive non-citizen knows that HIV/AIDS qualifies as such a disease and checks "no" on the visa application, the DHS may deny the application based on fraud if an agent has reason to suspect HIV/AIDS, such as medication found in luggage. The DHS may also turn away anyone who answers "yes" to this question, unless he or she qualifies for a discretionary waiver. To avoid these problems, non-immigrant visa applicants may request in advance a special waiver for visitors. HIV waivers are not easy to obtain and may result in processing delays or denial.

Waivers for Immigrants under INA §212(g)

Since December 1, 1987, all immigrant visa applicants 15 years or older have been required to submit to HIV testing. Applicants under 15 are also subject to testing if there is reason to suspect they may have HIV (such as hemophilia or an HIV-positive parent). But a waiver may be available to people with HIV who have certain family relationships. The individual must be the (opposite sex) spouse, parent or unmarried son or daughter of a U.S. citizen, permanent resident, or person issued an immigrant visa. There is one special exception to the "family member" requirement, and that exception applies to certain HIV-positive survivors of domestic violence.

Having the requisite family relationship or qualifying for the domestic violence exception is not enough on its own to obtain this waiver. Applicants must also meet a rigorous series of standards. One standard that must be overcome is the likelihood of the applicant becoming a "public charge." This ground is designed to prevent non-citizens from becoming dependent on the U.S. government for economic support if, for example, prolonged hospitalization or extensive medical care becomes necessary. Applicants must show they have the necessary means and capability to deal with a potential high-cost health situation.

Moreover, applicants with HIV must pass an "extra test," which does not appear anywhere in immigration law. They must also show: (1) that the danger to U.S. public health created by the applicant's admission is minimal; (2) that the possibility of the spread of HIV created by admission is minimal; and (3) that there will be no cost incurred by any level of U.S. government agency without the prior consent of that agency.

Once a 212(g) waiver is granted, it will remain in effect as long as it has not been revoked, no new grounds of inadmissibility have arisen, and the applicant is complying with the original conditions specified in the waiver. HIV waivers are not easy to obtain, however, and may result in processing delays or denial.

Waivers for Refugees and Asylum Seekers Under INA §209©

Regardless of HIV status, those that fear persecution in their home countries because of race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or social group are eligible to apply for asylum (if currently in the U.S.) or refugee status (if abroad). People seeking asylum do not need to apply for an HIV waiver, but those seeking "refugee status" abroad must obtain an HIV waiver. Non-citizens granted asylum, however, may later seek permanent residence and, at that time, must request a waiver.

No family relationship with a citizen or permanent resident is required for the refugee/asylum waiver. Instead, applicants must prove that they merit a discretionary waiver for humanitarian purposes, to assure family unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest. Refugees and asylum seekers are also exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility, but they are regularly subjected to the government's three-pronged "extra test" aimed at persons living with HIV. Encouragingly, in 1999, immigration authorities issued special guidance regarding HIV-positive refugees to make it easier for them to meet the "extra test."

You said, "It will be denied" - and now you said chances are slim. You dont know what you are talking about. Move on....

[payxibka 10,045]

Entering the U.S. With HIV/AIDS

Two major sets of rules prevent non-citizens from entering or staying in the U.S.: inadmissibility and deportability. HIV is not a ground of deportability, but it is a ground of inadmissibility. This means that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can "remove" someone from the U.S. for HIV only if the person entered without government permission. The DHS cannot deport someone for becoming HIV-positive, or for having an AIDS diagnosis, if that person entered on a valid visa or now has lawful permanent residence (a green card).

But the DHS does bar many people living with HIV from entering the country. This includes temporary visitors, such as tourists, students, workers, and those who intend to live in the U.S. permanently. There is another potential barrier for many HIV-positive non-citizens: the "public charge" ground, a concept in immigration law which refers to individuals who cannot support themselves and depend on public benefits for income.

People with HIV may qualify for a special "exception," also known as a discretionary waiver. (The waiver is "discretionary" because the government is not required to approve it.) Several different waivers exist, depending on whether the individual is seeking to enter the U.S. temporarily or permanently, or is fleeing persecution. These waivers share an important characteristic: applying for one will lengthen the processing time and increase the red tape of any application. (This description covers several common waivers, but is not completely comprehensive and is not intended as legal advice.)

All or substantially all of your arguement refers to HIV being an inadmissable condition... What part of the facts and circumstances of the OP do you not understand. Look at the highlighted section above. The OP is not wishing to be admitted as they are already here. Again... not a cut and dried situation but certainly not hard and fast as you pretend it to be.

[Sept07 0]

Hi Members.

I am still around and would like to share with you the thread below from which my hopes have been escalated.

Your Prayers and good wishes have not only kept me going but also inspired me immensely.My worries have diminished each day and I feel superb in readiness for what lays ahead.

With the information I got from this forum plus other sites I finally concluded and continue to believe that nothing is IMPOSSIBLE and am filled with hope after reading the story of a lady who has been recently approved. There is always light at the end of every tunnel,however long.

I wish you all well and success in your journeys too.

will keep you posted.

http://immigrate2us.net/forum/showthread.php?t=4981

[miles 0]

Hi Members.

I am still around and would like to share with you the thread below from which my hopes have been escalated.

Your Prayers and good wishes have not only kept me going but also inspired me immensely.My worries have diminished each day and I feel superb in readiness for what lays ahead.

With the information I got from this forum plus other sites I finally concluded and continue to believe that nothing is IMPOSSIBLE and am filled with hope after reading the story of a lady who has been recently approved. There is always light at the end of every tunnel,however long.

I wish you all well and success in your journeys too.

will keep you posted.

http://immigrate2us.net/forum/showthread.php?t=4981

Goodluck and keep your fingers crossed. We are still here waiting for your success and Good news!!!

Take Care

Miles

[Mags 112]

Like I said, be realistic and get real. It is truly sad, unfortunate and tragic, may God heal this person, but it is the law and the rules of USCIS on this matter. And you need to stop and think, why even bother having a medical exam for then if it is all ok to come to USA with anytime of disease or affliction to expose the rest of the US population with, the reality is it is not and face it CDC in USA along with USCIS has very good reasons for these medical exams, and to sit here and act like a person's chances of getting a visa to the USA under those aforementioned medical conditions are not being realistic nor is thinking a waiver is under these conditions, if there is some alternative to getting a visa then so be it, but chances are very slim under the conditions expressed, this in no way is dashing anyone's hopes it is giving an honest answer based on USCIS policy and rules, which I remind you as cruel and harsh as they seem, I did not write them, but they are what they are, it affects all of us here in the USA - think about it there is a reason for these rules, it is truly a sad and unfortunate turn of events, may God be with them. [/b]

If you can not offer any help or support to the OP perhaps it would be best if you were to accept that you've made the point you wanted to and now move on. It has been proven in this thread that people in the OP's situation ARE granted waivers for HIV so to argue otherwise seems rather pointless. Thank you for your co-operation.

OP ~ I'm glad that you've found some wonderful support in this forum and on the one you linked us to. I wish you all the best and every success in your life and future.

[zqt3344 21]

Like I said, be realistic and get real. It is truly sad, unfortunate and tragic, may God heal this person, but it is the law and the rules of USCIS on this matter. And you need to stop and think, why even bother having a medical exam for then if it is all ok to come to USA with anytime of disease or affliction to expose the rest of the US population with, the reality is it is not and face it CDC in USA along with USCIS has very good reasons for these medical exams, and to sit here and act like a person's chances of getting a visa to the USA under those aforementioned medical conditions are not being realistic nor is thinking a waiver is under these conditions, if there is some alternative to getting a visa then so be it, but chances are very slim under the conditions expressed, this in no way is dashing anyone's hopes it is giving an honest answer based on USCIS policy and rules, which I remind you as cruel and harsh as they seem, I did not write them, but they are what they are, it affects all of us here in the USA - think about it there is a reason for these rules, it is truly a sad and unfortunate turn of events, may God be with them. [/b]

If you can not offer any help or support to the OP perhaps it would be best if you were to accept that you've made the point you wanted to and now move on. It has been proven in this thread that people in the OP's situation ARE granted waivers for HIV so to argue otherwise seems rather pointless. Thank you for your co-operation.

OP ~ I'm glad that you've found some wonderful support in this forum and on the one you linked us to. I wish you all the best and every success in your life and future.

[Sept07 0]

Like I said, be realistic and get real. It is truly sad, unfortunate and tragic, may God heal this person, but it is the law and the rules of USCIS on this matter. And you need to stop and think, why even bother having a medical exam for then if it is all ok to come to USA with anytime of disease or affliction to expose the rest of the US population with, the reality is it is not and face it CDC in USA along with USCIS has very good reasons for these medical exams, and to sit here and act like a person's chances of getting a visa to the USA under those aforementioned medical conditions are not being realistic nor is thinking a waiver is under these conditions, if there is some alternative to getting a visa then so be it, but chances are very slim under the conditions expressed, this in no way is dashing anyone's hopes it is giving an honest answer based on USCIS policy and rules, which I remind you as cruel and harsh as they seem, I did not write them, but they are what they are, it affects all of us here in the USA - think about it there is a reason for these rules, it is truly a sad and unfortunate turn of events, may God be with them. [/b]

If you can not offer any help or support to the OP perhaps it would be best if you were to accept that you've made the point you wanted to and now move on. It has been proven in this thread that people in the OP's situation ARE granted waivers for HIV so to argue otherwise seems rather pointless. Thank you for your co-operation.

OP ~ I'm glad that you've found some wonderful support in this forum and on the one you linked us to. I wish you all the best and every success in your life and future.

MEANING??????

[rebeccajo 14]

Like I said, be realistic and get real. It is truly sad, unfortunate and tragic, may God heal this person, but it is the law and the rules of USCIS on this matter. And you need to stop and think, why even bother having a medical exam for then if it is all ok to come to USA with anytime of disease or affliction to expose the rest of the US population with, the reality is it is not and face it CDC in USA along with USCIS has very good reasons for these medical exams, and to sit here and act like a person's chances of getting a visa to the USA under those aforementioned medical conditions are not being realistic nor is thinking a waiver is under these conditions, if there is some alternative to getting a visa then so be it, but chances are very slim under the conditions expressed, this in no way is dashing anyone's hopes it is giving an honest answer based on USCIS policy and rules, which I remind you as cruel and harsh as they seem, I did not write them, but they are what they are, it affects all of us here in the USA - think about it there is a reason for these rules, it is truly a sad and unfortunate turn of events, may God be with them. [/b]

If you can not offer any help or support to the OP perhaps it would be best if you were to accept that you've made the point you wanted to and now move on. It has been proven in this thread that people in the OP's situation ARE granted waivers for HIV so to argue otherwise seems rather pointless. Thank you for your co-operation.

OP ~ I'm glad that you've found some wonderful support in this forum and on the one you linked us to. I wish you all the best and every success in your life and future.

What is your problem?

[Mags 112]

Like I said, be realistic and get real. It is truly sad, unfortunate and tragic, may God heal this person, but it is the law and the rules of USCIS on this matter. And you need to stop and think, why even bother having a medical exam for then if it is all ok to come to USA with anytime of disease or affliction to expose the rest of the US population with, the reality is it is not and face it CDC in USA along with USCIS has very good reasons for these medical exams, and to sit here and act like a person's chances of getting a visa to the USA under those aforementioned medical conditions are not being realistic nor is thinking a waiver is under these conditions, if there is some alternative to getting a visa then so be it, but chances are very slim under the conditions expressed, this in no way is dashing anyone's hopes it is giving an honest answer based on USCIS policy and rules, which I remind you as cruel and harsh as they seem, I did not write them, but they are what they are, it affects all of us here in the USA - think about it there is a reason for these rules, it is truly a sad and unfortunate turn of events, may God be with them. [/b]

If you can not offer any help or support to the OP perhaps it would be best if you were to accept that you've made the point you wanted to and now move on. It has been proven in this thread that people in the OP's situation ARE granted waivers for HIV so to argue otherwise seems rather pointless. Thank you for your co-operation.

OP ~ I'm glad that you've found some wonderful support in this forum and on the one you linked us to. I wish you all the best and every success in your life and future.

I was being serious actually and calling an end to this rather pointless discussion that has been desperately derailing this thread. I'm going to stick my foot down now and actually say that any further discussion regarding this may be made invisible if it continues to take the emphasis away from the OP. This is HER thread and we should have some respect for her and support her.

Thank you.

Edited November 29, 2007 by Mags