Nearly 1 in 5 Democrats Say World Will Be Better Off if U.S. Loses War

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

I'd wager a guess that if OBL had half the security detail that W enjoys, he'd be seen more frequently.

Why would someone that hides behind the poor and unfortunate need a security detail?

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I'd wager a guess that if OBL had half the security detail that W enjoys, he'd be seen more frequently.

Why would someone that hides behind the poor and unfortunate need a security detail?

Second one that missed the point. Do we have a third?

[Dan J 277]

Studies also show that those same 1 of 5 democrats are clinically retarded ("Clinically retarded" is a is trademarked insult exclusive reserved for the sole use by Sheriff Uling, so PM me to receive a licence agreement or face criminal charges) .

vs 1 of 1 Republicans?

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

I'd wager a guess that if OBL had half the security detail that W enjoys, he'd be seen more frequently.

Why would someone that hides behind the poor and unfortunate need a security detail?

Second one that missed the point. Do we have a third?

Your response says something else or you wouldnt have bothered. I love psychology.

[monagoz 2]

Throw in the towel lets get the heck out of IRAQ.

VJ is a very informative and educational site, please stop reposting this right-wing propaganda nonsense. Most of us are share information and assistance concerning our visa experiences. We have enough blogs and sites that habour political views. There are enough stress dealing with USCIS to start to include this, please take it to somewhere else. Thank you

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I'd wager a guess that if OBL had half the security detail that W enjoys, he'd be seen more frequently.

Why would someone that hides behind the poor and unfortunate need a security detail?

Second one that missed the point. Do we have a third?

Your response says something else or you wouldnt have bothered. I love psychology.

Look: I did not make that comment in a vacuum but rather responded to some other statement when making the comment. Context, you know. Read the statement I responded to and then connect the dots to the comment I made. It's really fairly easy.

[Dan J 277]

Throw in the towel lets get the heck out of IRAQ.

VJ is a very informative and educational site, please stop reposting this right-wing propaganda nonsense. Most of us are share information and assistance concerning our visa experiences. We have enough blogs and sites that habour political views. There are enough stress dealing with USCIS to start to include this, please take it to somewhere else. Thank you

?? Its called off topic for a reason.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Throw in the towel lets get the heck out of IRAQ.

VJ is a very informative and educational site, please stop reposting this right-wing propaganda nonsense. Most of us are share information and assistance concerning our visa experiences. We have enough blogs and sites that habour political views. There are enough stress dealing with USCIS to start to include this, please take it to somewhere else. Thank you

A lot of folks enjoy sharing thoughts on anything and everything in the off topic section. We throw in some nonsense from time to time and find ourselves picking on each other. All just for the fun of it. If you don't like it, don't click on it.

Thank You!

Edited October 9, 2007 by Mr. Big Dog

[mRx 16]

Mr. Dog, I get your point. I think OBL has plenty of security, but not enough to stop us from splattering him if he made his exact location known. Fair enough.

There is no reason to compare the two though. It's useless.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Mr. Dog, I get your point. I think OBL has plenty of security, but not enough to stop us from splattering him if he made his exact location known. Fair enough.

There is no reason to compare the two though. It's useless.

The bold part is my point exactly. So I must ask: Why did you?

[mRx 16]

So I must ask: Why did you?

Good question... I guess I fell right into Dan's trap:

Suicide bombers are merely a weapon, one of the "weapons" built by the business of terrorism. There is alot of money that goes into the process of enticing, molding, and brainwashing these prospective weapons. If Bin Laden was a true believer of his B.S, and terrorism was fueled by ideals, then he would have been on one of those jetliners.

Since when do leaders do the fighting? Bush or any of his cabinet haven't gone to Iraq and fought alongside the soldiers they are leading. So by using your logic, Bush doesn't believe the BS he is saying.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Matt, you just got spun.

[mRx 16]

Matt, you just got spun.

Not really, Marc, there is no point in comparing the President to a terrorist leader.

I still believe that the GWOT is effective at destroying and disabling the business of terrorism. Terrorists no longer have a comfort zone to prepare, therefore attacks are less effective. AQ is running out of options, losing supporters, losing funds, and losing leaders. It's good progress that is being made. Withdrawing would reverse all the good that has been done here.

I don't believe any of the ####### about AQ being fueled by our presence in Iraq. I think the talks of withdrawing is what is really fueling them.

[Dan J 277]

Matt, you just got spun.

Not really, Marc, there is no point in comparing the President to a terrorist leader.

I still believe that the GWOT is effective at destroying and disabling the business of terrorism. Terrorists no longer have a comfort zone to prepare, therefore attacks are less effective. AQ is running out of options, losing supporters, losing funds, and losing leaders. It's good progress that is being made. Withdrawing would reverse all the good that has been done here.

I don't believe any of the ####### about AQ being fueled by our presence in Iraq. I think the talks of withdrawing is what is really fueling them.

Keep telling yourself that. A terrorist organization can adapt and change its tactics much faster than the military does. As long as its cause remains valid and there are people willing to support them, they will always be a threat.

Don't forget, AQ never operated in Iraq until we got there.

You cant destroy an idea with bullets. You need to use better ideas. Public Diplomacy will be the end to AQ, military action only strengthens it.

[mRx 16]

Matt, you just got spun.

Not really, Marc, there is no point in comparing the President to a terrorist leader.

I still believe that the GWOT is effective at destroying and disabling the business of terrorism. Terrorists no longer have a comfort zone to prepare, therefore attacks are less effective. AQ is running out of options, losing supporters, losing funds, and losing leaders. It's good progress that is being made. Withdrawing would reverse all the good that has been done here.

I don't believe any of the ####### about AQ being fueled by our presence in Iraq. I think the talks of withdrawing is what is really fueling them.

Keep telling yourself that. A terrorist organization can adapt and change its tactics much faster than the military does. As long as its cause remains valid and there are people willing to support them, they will always be a threat.

Don't forget, AQ never operated in Iraq until we got there.

You cant destroy an idea with bullets. You need to use better ideas. Public Diplomacy will be the end to AQ, military action only strengthens it.

Hasn't AQ already proved that they will not negotiate diplomatically? How do you approach a group using a tactic that they are totally against?

If the military pulls out, Iraqis will have no way of preventing violence from consuming their country. We have a responsibility to prevent that from happening, no?

Terrorism is an action. An action is performed by a being. A being can be shot.