Jump to content

98 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Wow.....now the tune has changed on this forum.

The anti-illegal immigrant issue always has the danger of spilling over to all immigrants. This is just one instance but I think we could see more. The American public does not have enough knowlegde (or sympathy for that matter) of what we have to go through.

Let's hope anti-illegal immigrant doesn't turn into anti-immigrant.

The point does have some merit... a lot of the fraudulent AOS stuff takes place from tourist adjustment cases. If they just closed that loophole, I think you would see the numbers of fradulent marriages significantly decrease.

At add to the Agent's post, a tourist adjustment is relatively quick way to get it.. if you forced these people to have to go back and get a visa, the amount of fraud this way would decrease... the genuine people would be more than willing to get it...

Just as many marriage frauds are done by K1 & K3 so lets not pick on the VWP/tourists.....

Kezzie

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Just as many marriage frauds are done by K1 & K3 so lets not pick on the VWP/tourists.....

No one is picking on anyone.

It just a fact that there is more fraud among tourists who adjust based on marriage than in K1 adjustments. It makes perfect sense to combat a problem by going to where its most prevalent.

Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Filed: Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)

I'm not picking on anyone Kezzie... but the truth is the truth....

It is far too easy to adjust on a tourist status. There are many people like you who have done it that way and have had the most honorable intentions.. but let's be honest... if the tourist adjustmnet path wasn't there and you HAD to get a K1 or K3 to become a permanent resident, would you have done it?... of course you would... because you love your spouse and would do anything to be together.. no matter how many hoops you had to jump through.

Someone with less honorable intentions than you would not...they would be less likely to bother to jump through those hoops and put out the expense needs to get through those hoops..

Edited by zyggy

Knowledge itself is power - Sir Francis Bacon

I have gone fishing... you can find me by going here http://**removed due to TOS**

Posted (edited)

I don't think anyone is picking on VWP/B-2 adjusters here, rather just saying it is, admittedly, much easier to be a VWP/B-2 adjuster than go through a K or CR-1 process.

Edited by pax

Abby (U.S.) and Ewen (Scotland): We laughed. We cried. Our witness didn't speak English. Happily married (finally), 27 December 2006.

Latest news: Green card received 16 April 2007. USCIS-free until 3 January 2009! Eligible to naturalize 3 April 2010.

Click on the "timeline" link at the left to view our timeline. And don't forget to update yours!

The London Interviews Thread: Wait times, interview dates, and chitchat for all visa types

The London Waivers Thread: For I-601 or I-212 applicants in London (UK, Ireland, and Scandinavia)

The London Graduates Thread: Moving stateside, AOS, and OT for London applicants and petitioners

all the mud in this town, all the dirt in this world

none of it sticks on you, you shake it off

'cause you're better than that, and you don't need it

there's nothing wrong with you

--Neil Finn

On second thought, let us not go to Camelot. 'Tis a silly place.

--Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Morocco
Timeline
Posted
Just as many marriage frauds are done by K1 & K3 so lets not pick on the VWP/tourists.....

But do you know that for sure?

I think if we can gather anything from the article, it's that there isn't sufficient time to investigate fraud. So how can we know what type of applicant is more likely to be fraudulent?

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Peru
Timeline
Posted

Hmmm....we shouldn't really allow anyone who entered on a tourist visa to get married here and circumvent the system. They should be forced to do things the correct way and under the correct process.

12/5/05 Sent I129F Petition to Nebraska via Express Mail

12/6/05 Packaged received at 10:38 am in Nebraska

12/9/05 Check cashed (Never been so happy to have money leave my account)

12/12/05 Receive NOA1 snail mail - 30-60 day processing estimate

01/04/06 Receive NOA2 via e-mail

1/20/06 NVC letter in mail...will ship within a week.

2/1/06 Packet 3 and 4 in the mail

3/15/06 Interview - neither approved nor declined need to send in Migratory Movement Certificate AP

3/20/06 Migratory Movement Certificate for myself and fiancee sent to US Embassy in Lima

3/23/06 Visa Approved

5/19/06 I leave for Peru to pick up mi amor

5/25/06 Lucia and I arrive in Chicago

7/01/06 Legal Marriage

9/09/06 Religious Wedding

Filed: Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Until recently Canada made all spousal applicants get a visa to be able to become a permanent resident. Those who were in Canada had the choice to apply in the US or their home country...

Edited by zyggy

Knowledge itself is power - Sir Francis Bacon

I have gone fishing... you can find me by going here http://**removed due to TOS**

Posted
mercuryroad

What I did under the VWP was correct and under the correct process... and until they change the law it will remain a correct option that is available to some people.... but not all

Kezzie

Well, I think the point being made is that some people believe the law should be changed.

It's worth noting that an American traveling visa-free on a tourist basis in the UK can't get married to a UK citizen in the UK without a fiance/e visa, period.

Abby (U.S.) and Ewen (Scotland): We laughed. We cried. Our witness didn't speak English. Happily married (finally), 27 December 2006.

Latest news: Green card received 16 April 2007. USCIS-free until 3 January 2009! Eligible to naturalize 3 April 2010.

Click on the "timeline" link at the left to view our timeline. And don't forget to update yours!

The London Interviews Thread: Wait times, interview dates, and chitchat for all visa types

The London Waivers Thread: For I-601 or I-212 applicants in London (UK, Ireland, and Scandinavia)

The London Graduates Thread: Moving stateside, AOS, and OT for London applicants and petitioners

all the mud in this town, all the dirt in this world

none of it sticks on you, you shake it off

'cause you're better than that, and you don't need it

there's nothing wrong with you

--Neil Finn

On second thought, let us not go to Camelot. 'Tis a silly place.

--Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

The article says this is the easy way....I would hate to try the hard way.

*January 24 2006 - mailed in I129-F petition

*January 25 2006 - I129-F received at CSC

*January 30 2006 - packet returned.....arggggggggg we forgot one signature!!

*January 31 2006 - sent I129-F back to the CSC, hope we did not forget anything else

*February 1 2006 - I129-F received at CSC again

*February 3 2006 - NOA1

*April 20 2006 - NOA2!!!!!

*April 24 2006 - Touched!

*May 15 2006 - NVC received petition today!

*May 17 2006 - Case left NVC today!!

*May 30 2006 - Received Packet 3 from Vancouver!

*May 30 2006 - Faxed back Packet 3!!

*June 6 2006 - Received packet 4!

*June 20 2006 - Medical in Saskatoon

*June 28 2006 - Interview in Vancouver!!

*June 28 2006 - GOT THE VISA!!!*June 30 2006 - Moving day!

*July 3 2006 - Home at last!!

*July 28 2006 - married!

*September 13 2006 - Mailed AOS/EAD package

*September 25 2006 - Received NOA for AOS/EAD

*October 6 2006 - Biometrics appointments

*October 10 2006 - Touched!

*October 19 2006 - Transferred to CSC!

*October 26 2006 - Received by CSC

*October 27 2006 - Touched

*October 28 2006 - Touched again

*October 31 2006 - Touched again

*November 2 2006 - Touched again

*November 3 2006- and another touch

*November 7 2006- touched

*November 7 2006 - My case approved, still waiting for kids!

*November 8 2006 - Touched my case again

*November 13 2006 - Greencard arrived...yeah I can work!

*November 14 2006 - Touched my case again

*January 2007 - RFE for kids Greencard.

*February 2007 - kids medical and sent in RFE

*February 2007 - Received kids greencards

Filed: Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
mercuryroad

What I did under the VWP was correct and under the correct process... and until they change the law it will remain a correct option that is available to some people.... but not all

Kezzie

Exactly.. no one is faulting you for what you did.. it was fine and legal for your situation...

What people are saying is that the law should be changed and that way to adjust their status should be closed off.. if it was made harder to get permanent resident status through marriage by making everyone get a marriage visa first, the amount of fraudulent marriage would very likely decrease..

Knowledge itself is power - Sir Francis Bacon

I have gone fishing... you can find me by going here http://**removed due to TOS**

Posted
There are no limits on foreign spouses. If you can marry a U.S. citizen or legal permanent resident (a "green card" holder), you're guaranteed permanent access to the USA.

No limits on LPR spouses, eh?

This reporter needs to do some homework...

If wait times of at least 5 years for spouses of LPRs counts as "no limits," then sure. :whistle:

Abby (U.S.) and Ewen (Scotland): We laughed. We cried. Our witness didn't speak English. Happily married (finally), 27 December 2006.

Latest news: Green card received 16 April 2007. USCIS-free until 3 January 2009! Eligible to naturalize 3 April 2010.

Click on the "timeline" link at the left to view our timeline. And don't forget to update yours!

The London Interviews Thread: Wait times, interview dates, and chitchat for all visa types

The London Waivers Thread: For I-601 or I-212 applicants in London (UK, Ireland, and Scandinavia)

The London Graduates Thread: Moving stateside, AOS, and OT for London applicants and petitioners

all the mud in this town, all the dirt in this world

none of it sticks on you, you shake it off

'cause you're better than that, and you don't need it

there's nothing wrong with you

--Neil Finn

On second thought, let us not go to Camelot. 'Tis a silly place.

--Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Filed: K-3 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
Yet, Congress and the Bush administration have been so focused on border fences, guest-worker or amnesty programs that marriage-based immigration fraud has largely gone unnoticed. Immigration officials described fraud as rampant in a 2002 GAO report. Marriage fraud accounted for approximately half of all immigration fraud cases, the agency reported.

The sad thing is the world will read that and and jump on the issue presented without noticing it says the report is from 2002....From there happily and blindly eating up what the media spoon feeds them, never taking the personal responsibility of researching before talking, people will start protesting against family based immigration, even calling up the terrorism card in their efforts to abolish it....and never once notice that 2002 sitting there in front of their facese and acknowledge that things were implimented in 2005 to decrease the amount of cases of it.

Logically speaking of all the different types of visa's there are to choose from, I would think the business/work based ones would be most vulnerable at least so far as unsavory elements. We are put through months, sometimes years of waiting as our petitions go through the system, and considering how far they go in investigating some relationships and people I would say the percentage that might slip by them would be incredibly low. On the other hand, all a business has to do is give the government $1000.00 and their case is guaranteed to be adjudicated in 15 days, now tell me those are really being thoroughly investigated.

And hey what about the entrepreneur visa, that one is just rich. If someone from a foreign country has so much to invest in business in the US and can show them that their business venture can make so many jobs available thus helping our economy they are allowed entry. Sounds goooood doesn't it, building our country, providing jobs for US workers. What sounds good doesn't always work that way, I myself know of one business that started that way, and you know how they filled the jobs they created? By using the business/worker visa program to bring their friends in from their country to fill the positions.

Okay whew

/rant off

July 12, 2002 - Married

I130

May 18, 2005 - Sent Certified Mail USPS with Money Order for fees

May 20, 2005 - Received Date

June 2, 2005 - Notice Date

June 6, 2005 - Received NOA1

September 10, 2005No action to date

December 1, 2005 -Approved

I129

August 25, 2005 - Sent Certified Mail USPS with Money Order for fees

August 26, 2005 - USPS tracking shows Delivered, August 26, 2005, 1:54 pm, CHICAGO, IL 60680

September 7, 2005 - "touched" I think

September 12, 2005 - Received NOA1 showing receipt date of August 30, 2005

October 17, 2005 - APPROVED!!!

November 27, 2005 - Received by NVC

November 3, 2005 - RFE received from Consulate

November 18, 2005 - RFE delivered to Consulate

November 28, 2005 - Instructions received

December 6, 2005 - Medical Appt Much confusion and lack of communication by Physicians caused much delay :(

March 23 - Checklist received

May 12 - Packet 4 received

June 1 - Interview

June 1 - APPROVED!!!!!

June 7 - Steve Arrived home

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Peru
Timeline
Posted
mercuryroad

What I did under the VWP was correct and under the correct process... and until they change the law it will remain a correct option that is available to some people.... but not all

Kezzie

I'm just illustrating my point about this anti-immigrant crossover. We have a lot of people on these boards willing to flame the hell out of illegal immigrants but the moment it might affect their process the whole tune changes.

In a sense, it could be viewed that people entering here as tourists should visit and go home....not get married. That could be looked at as a form of illegal immigration, so let's get rid of that.

If there is plenty of marriage fraud and if that is indeed one of the main avenues for people to come here through sham marriages, then maybe we need much more strict supervision and scrutiny for all K1 cases. The people that enter these sham marriages are thus illegal immigrants.

And what kinds of jobs are these foreign spouses getting once they come here.......it isn't fair that foreigners are taking our good paying jobs that native born Americans need.

I don't agree with any of this personally - and I don't think anything about your circumstance is wrong. But, I can easily see the American public starting to get these viewpoints after all of the illegal immigration bashing. The public's problem with illegal immigration has not been the fact that they did it illegally.....I don't think the American public in general cares.

What they do care about are their jobs, health care costs, tax dollars, other languages being taught in school....etc. Those are the issues that they care about and it is easy to see how those issues could be applied to legal immigrants as well. Just mention the fact that terrorists came over this way and everyone will be in an uproar and not have much sympathy for what the honest people that found love and want to live together are going through.

12/5/05 Sent I129F Petition to Nebraska via Express Mail

12/6/05 Packaged received at 10:38 am in Nebraska

12/9/05 Check cashed (Never been so happy to have money leave my account)

12/12/05 Receive NOA1 snail mail - 30-60 day processing estimate

01/04/06 Receive NOA2 via e-mail

1/20/06 NVC letter in mail...will ship within a week.

2/1/06 Packet 3 and 4 in the mail

3/15/06 Interview - neither approved nor declined need to send in Migratory Movement Certificate AP

3/20/06 Migratory Movement Certificate for myself and fiancee sent to US Embassy in Lima

3/23/06 Visa Approved

5/19/06 I leave for Peru to pick up mi amor

5/25/06 Lucia and I arrive in Chicago

7/01/06 Legal Marriage

9/09/06 Religious Wedding

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...