Jump to content
Kathryn41

Unexpected result of US illegal immigrants crack down

 Share

58 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
I'm just pointing out that I don't think this will turn out to be a huge incentive. Not more than the ability to make the equivalent of a six-figure salary in the States. I think economics is driving most illegal immigration, not free public benefits.

Another way to solve this problem would be to process asylum applications faster, so it's not 14 months waiting.

And again, they're not in Canada illegally. Someone is not automatically illegal because they're a migrant Mexican worker. They might be in the U.S. illegally and in Canada legally. As is the case here.

correct, but when the illegals cross from the usa to canada in the ops story it's highly unlikely are legal in canada......

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
I'm just pointing out that I don't think this will turn out to be a huge incentive. Not more than the ability to make the equivalent of a six-figure salary in the States. I think economics is driving most illegal immigration, not free public benefits.

Another way to solve this problem would be to process asylum applications faster, so it's not 14 months waiting.

And again, they're not in Canada illegally. Someone is not automatically illegal because they're a migrant Mexican worker. They might be in the U.S. illegally and in Canada legally. As is the case here.

correct, but when the illegals cross from the usa to canada in the ops story it's highly unlikely are legal in canada......

Especially since so far less than 13% have been granted refugee status.

Up until now, less than 13 per cent of Mexican refugee applicants have been granted status in Canada, he said.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Japan
Timeline
I'm just pointing out that I don't think this will turn out to be a huge incentive. Not more than the ability to make the equivalent of a six-figure salary in the States. I think economics is driving most illegal immigration, not free public benefits.

Another way to solve this problem would be to process asylum applications faster, so it's not 14 months waiting.

And again, they're not in Canada illegally. Someone is not automatically illegal because they're a migrant Mexican worker. They might be in the U.S. illegally and in Canada legally. As is the case here.

Free public benefits fall under monetary gain or ability to access resources without the expense so it is part of economics of them invading USA

Freeloading .

gewelcome-vi.gif

3dflagsdotcom_japan_2faws-vi.gif

IMPORTANT NOTICE:Like you all, I am not an attorney ; I am a layperson (I have laid a lot of persons ) My advice is based on Experience obtained by filing ourselves

AOS met in Japan 1994 married 10/2004

DO:Los Angeles,Ca.

6/17/06 Forms Sent (I-130, I-485, and I-765)

6/19/06 RD I-130,I-485, I-765

6/26/06 NOA rcvd

7/15/06 Biometrics complete Day 22

8/4/06 Interview Notice Rcvd Day 42

9/9/06 EAD Card Received :)Day 78

9/13/06 SS Card Received :)Day 82

9/27/06 AOS Interview Los Angeles APPROVED LPR Day 96

12/04/06 Welcome To the United States Letter received

12/08/06 Green Card Received- expires 12/2016

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

It sure seems to me that many of the Americans here seem to have a problem understanding the words 'legal' immigration - which is surprising since those of us on the website are ones who are following the legal process.

The story - for those who apparently don't read things carefully - refers to visitors who have been legally admitted at the border and inspected by border guards who then turn around and file refugee claims to remain in Canada. They are not illegally in Canada even if they were illegally in the US. Up until about 5 or 6 years ago, fully 76% of the refugee claimants in Canada entered Canada from the US. Then, the US and Canada signed an agreement that any refugee claimant already in Canada or the US will not be allowed to file a refugee claim in the other country as they are already in a 'safe' location. These Mexicans may or may not be illegally in the US, although it sure sounds like they are. They are claiming protection from prosecution, however being prosecuted in a safe country because you have violated the laws of that country (immigration) are not considered viable grounds for granting refugee status. Their claim will almost definitely be denied and they will be deported. The problems will occur if they are not detained until their hearing - which they must attend in person or it will be automatically denied. Once it appears likely their claim will be denied they may indeed disappear and become illegal.

A number of years ago when the boat people were arriving from China there were quite a few who ended up foundering in Canadian waters on their way to the US. Several hundred arrived in Canada, were detained, applied for refugee status and the majority were denied and returned back home to China. A scant handful of claims were accepted as valid and the individuals were allowed to remain in Canada. It will probably be very much the same with these Mexicans. Economic refugees do not qualify. If they can live safely in Mexico then their claims will be denied and they will be returned to Mexico.

So, please repeat after me - These are NOT illegal immigrants - they are legally present in Canada having been admitted through the border and have applied for a legitimate immigration benefit.

Edited by Kathryn41

“...Isn't it splendid to think of all the things there are to find out about? It just makes me feel glad to be alive--it's such an interesting world. It wouldn't be half so interesting if we knew all about everything, would it? There'd be no scope for imagination then, would there?”

. Lucy Maude Montgomery, Anne of Green Gables

5892822976_477b1a77f7_z.jpg

Another Member of the VJ Fluffy Kitty Posse!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just pointing out that I don't think this will turn out to be a huge incentive. Not more than the ability to make the equivalent of a six-figure salary in the States. I think economics is driving most illegal immigration, not free public benefits.

Another way to solve this problem would be to process asylum applications faster, so it's not 14 months waiting.

And again, they're not in Canada illegally. Someone is not automatically illegal because they're a migrant Mexican worker. They might be in the U.S. illegally and in Canada legally. As is the case here.

correct, but when the illegals cross from the usa to canada in the ops story it's highly unlikely are legal in canada......

Not according to the article, which as Kathryn pointed out, says that they're in Canada currently legally and are applying for a status which is pending.

Plus, if you're sneaking into Canada illegally, you're not going to do it at the Windsor/Detroit crossings.

AOS

-

Filed: 8/1/07

NOA1:9/7/07

Biometrics: 9/28/07

EAD/AP: 10/17/07

EAD card ordered again (who knows, maybe we got the two-fer deal): 10/23/-7

Transferred to CSC: 10/26/07

Approved: 11/21/07

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

BUSTED!

People in the United States who wish to claim refugee status at the Canadian border

It has come to our attention that there are private individuals and organizations in the United States who are targeting certain foreign nationals and providing false or misleading information on how to claim refugee status in Canada.

This includes advertising of "special programs" for Haitians, Mexicans and other nationalities. Please note that the Government of Canada has no special programs to fast track applications, give preferential treatment or grant refugee status to Haitians, Mexicans or other nationals seeking refugee status.

  • You cannot purchase admission to any immigration or refugee program to gain refugee status.
  • You do not need to purchase forms.
  • You cannot "exchange" U.S. documents for any type of Canadian "permit."
People should be wary of all organizations or individuals who make such claims.

For more information: refugee protection in Canada.

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/me...tice-border.asp

I'm pretty sure you claim refugee status at POE

:yes:

The Refugee System: Refugee claims in Canada

Canada offers refugee protection to people in Canada who fear persecution or who may be at risk of torture or cruel and unusual treatment or punishment, and are unwilling or unable to return to their home country.

If you feel that you will be persecuted or otherwise at risk as mentioned above, if you return to your home country, you can seek protection in Canada as a Convention Refugee or a person in need of protection. To be eligible, you must apply from within Canada or at a point of entry to Canada.

Edited by devilette
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Also interesting & the reason they will (likely) get denied:

Safe Third Country Agreement

Under an agreement with the United States, refugee claimants must seek asylum (protection) in the first safe country where they arrive. For example, if you entered Canada at a land border from the United States, you will not be able to claim refugee protection in Canada. Sometimes there are exceptions (such as those who already have family in Canada). You can find more information about the Safe Third Country Agreement in the Related Links section at the bottom of this page.

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/refugees/inside/apply-who.asp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
It sure seems to me that many of the Americans here seem to have a problem understanding the words 'legal' immigration - which is surprising since those of us on the website are ones who are following the legal process.

The story - for those who apparently don't read things carefully - refers to visitors who have been legally admitted at the border and inspected by border guards who then turn around and file refugee claims to remain in Canada. They are not illegally in Canada even if they were illegally in the US. Up until about 5 or 6 years ago, fully 76% of the refugee claimants in Canada entered Canada from the US. Then, the US and Canada signed an agreement that any refugee claimant already in Canada or the US will not be allowed to file a refugee claim in the other country as they are already in a 'safe' location. These Mexicans may or may not be illegally in the US, although it sure sounds like they are. They are claiming protection from prosecution, however being prosecuted in a safe country because you have violated the laws of that country (immigration) are not considered viable grounds for granting refugee status. Their claim will almost definitely be denied and they will be deported. The problems will occur if they are not detained until their hearing - which they must attend in person or it will be automatically denied. Once it appears likely their claim will be denied they may indeed disappear and become illegal.

A number of years ago when the boat people were arriving from China there were quite a few who ended up foundering in Canadian waters on their way to the US. Several hundred arrived in Canada, were detained, applied for refugee status and the majority were denied and returned back home to China. A scant handful of claims were accepted as valid and the individuals were allowed to remain in Canada. It will probably be very much the same with these Mexicans. Economic refugees do not qualify. If they can live safely in Mexico then their claims will be denied and they will be returned to Mexico.

So, please repeat after me - These are NOT illegal immigrants - they are legally present in Canada having been admitted through the border and have applied for a legitimate immigration benefit.

Excellent post, Kathryn! :thumbs::yes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Not according to the article, which as Kathryn pointed out, says that they're in Canada currently legally and are applying for a status which is pending.

Come on, Caladan, you know better. Anyone can "apply for asylum" in the U.S. or Canada

and obtain some sort of a temporary legal status while their application is pending -- it's a legal

loophole of sorts, so yes, technically "legal", but it's still fraud.

biden_pinhead.jpgspace.gifrolling-stones-american-flag-tongue.jpgspace.gifinside-geico.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not according to the article, which as Kathryn pointed out, says that they're in Canada currently legally and are applying for a status which is pending.

Come on, Caladan, you know better. Anyone can "apply for asylum" in the U.S. or Canada

and obtain some sort of a temporary legal status while their application is pending -- it's a legal

loophole of sorts, so yes, technically "legal", but it's still fraud.

Come on, mark, you know better than to toss around 'fraud' when you mean 'pretty much not fraud.' The asylum claim will likely not be granted, but that doesn't actually have any bearing on whether they're in the country legally now. Where's the fraud in a failed petition?

It's temporary LEGAL status. It's not a legal loophole. It's one the Canadian government may very well close if there's more than 180 people trying to use it to stay in Canada, but giving someone a legal status for a pending adjustment application when they entered the country on a valid visa... wait a second... I think I've heard something like that....

AOS

-

Filed: 8/1/07

NOA1:9/7/07

Biometrics: 9/28/07

EAD/AP: 10/17/07

EAD card ordered again (who knows, maybe we got the two-fer deal): 10/23/-7

Transferred to CSC: 10/26/07

Approved: 11/21/07

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Brazil
Timeline
It sure seems to me that many of the Americans here seem to have a problem understanding the words 'legal' immigration - which is surprising since those of us on the website are ones who are following the legal process.

The story - for those who apparently don't read things carefully - refers to visitors who have been legally admitted at the border and inspected by border guards who then turn around and file refugee claims to remain in Canada. They are not illegally in Canada even if they were illegally in the US. Up until about 5 or 6 years ago, fully 76% of the refugee claimants in Canada entered Canada from the US. Then, the US and Canada signed an agreement that any refugee claimant already in Canada or the US will not be allowed to file a refugee claim in the other country as they are already in a 'safe' location. These Mexicans may or may not be illegally in the US, although it sure sounds like they are. They are claiming protection from prosecution, however being prosecuted in a safe country because you have violated the laws of that country (immigration) are not considered viable grounds for granting refugee status. Their claim will almost definitely be denied and they will be deported. The problems will occur if they are not detained until their hearing - which they must attend in person or it will be automatically denied. Once it appears likely their claim will be denied they may indeed disappear and become illegal.

A number of years ago when the boat people were arriving from China there were quite a few who ended up foundering in Canadian waters on their way to the US. Several hundred arrived in Canada, were detained, applied for refugee status and the majority were denied and returned back home to China. A scant handful of claims were accepted as valid and the individuals were allowed to remain in Canada. It will probably be very much the same with these Mexicans. Economic refugees do not qualify. If they can live safely in Mexico then their claims will be denied and they will be returned to Mexico.

So, please repeat after me - These are NOT illegal immigrants - they are legally present in Canada having been admitted through the border and have applied for a legitimate immigration benefit.

And Canada can help pay their bills until they are denied ... and if they can find the denied persons ... Canada will pay to send them back to their home country? :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...