Palestinian terrorist on Britney and Madonna: "If I meet these whores I will have the honor to be the first one to cut their heads off"

[tonyr7 0]

opinions are like #######

everybody's got one

[Ban Hammer 13,364]

opinions are like #######

everybody's got one

AND they all stink

[Nagishkaw 510]

Some worse than others, I hear.

[The_dip_sticks 0]

Difficult???, since the country is smaller than some states in the US and they have been there for 4 years and still found nothing and they have arrested practicaly everyone from the former bhathist party including deserters of some who gained safe havens in the US and UK and they still could not find them. I would safely say there isnt any there. Also I might add there were some 150 inspectors in Iraq. That would be like me saying the US nerve gassed the Iraqi's... I just havent found the evidence yet....lol... yes it is absured isnt it. Nice how you dodge the chemical question.

memory problems? link

third point - white phosphorous is not considered to be a chemical weapon. a chemical weapon is something along the lines of nerve agent, blister agent, and so on.

we'll just have to differ on many of those points, but concerning white phosphorous - here's a quote from wikipedia, aka the number 6 reference system

White phosphorus is a flare / smoke producing incendiary weapon,[1] or smoke-screening agent, made from a common allotrope of the chemical element phosphorus. White Phosphorus (WP) bombs and shells are essentially incendiary devices, but can also be used as an offensive anti-personnel flame compound capable of causing serious burns or death[2]. It is used in bombs, artillery shells, and mortar shells which burst into burning flakes of phosphorus upon impact. White Phosphorus is commonly referred to in military jargon as "WP". The Vietnam-era slang "Willy(ie) Pete" or "Willy(ie) Peter" is still occasionally heard.

White phosphorus weapons are controversial today because of its potential use against humans, for whom one-tenth of a gram is a deadly dose. In recent years, the US and Israel[3] have admitted using WP against enemy targets. Particularly, its use by the US, given the public stance against chemical weapons, has resulted in considerable controversy (see White phosphorus use in Iraq). Initial field reports from Iraq casually referred to White Phosphorus use against humans[4], but it was officially denied until November 2005[5].

Subsequently however, the Pentagon admitted [6] to its use while claiming that its use for smoke signals is legal and does not violate chemical weapon conventions[7]. However, a statement by a Pentagon spokesman says "It was used as an incendiary weapon against enemy combatants,"[8]

In any event, the United States is not a signatory to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, and even this mentions WP only in a Schedule[9], and not as a chemical weapon per se (more details below).

Effects on humans

White phosphorus can cause injuries and death in three ways: by burning deep into soft tissue, by being inhaled as a smoke and by being ingested. Extensive exposure in any way can be fatal.

link

Yes but that link still proves its a chemical weapon when used on persons. It says not a chemical weapon PER SAY meaning because it has another use unlike nerve gas for example which has only 1 use. But since it is a chemical and when used against people it is a weapon put the 2 words togather you get "chemical weapon"

Here are some more quotes from other links:

1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (signed by the US) prohibit the use of the CHEMICAL properties of white phosphorus against personnel.

According to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, quoted by the RAI documentary, WP is allowed as an illumination device, not as an offensive weapon, for which its chemical properties are put to use.

The link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Phantom_Fury

IRAQ HAS POSSIBLY EMPLOYED PHOSPHOROUS CHEMICAL WEAPONS AGAINST THE KURDISH POPULATION IN AREAS ALONG THE IRAQI-TURKISH-IRANIAN BORDERS. […]

link: http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/21/phosphorus-chemical/

there are more but im sure this will suffice. So yes per say its not a chemical weapon as it has another use but it is a CHEMICAL. So when used as a weapon than "chemical weapon"

You know its ok to call it a chemical weapon when sadam used it but not when a coalition force uses it, thats hypocracy. Lets just call it what it is who ever uses it.

[Heracles 417]

What are you talking about you buffoon. I have not started any posts on american foreign policy, just posted some views and by the way GWB is the best comedian i know a better buffoon then you will ever be.

I would like to see you say that in person..

[The_dip_sticks 0]

What are you talking about you buffoon. I have not started any posts on american foreign policy, just posted some views and by the way GWB is the best comedian i know a better buffoon then you will ever be.

I would like to see you say that in person..

I would like to too.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Awww are you two about to have a circle jerk?

[Jasman0717 9]

Oh brother, can't people mind their own business

[Heracles 417]

What are you talking about you buffoon. I have not started any posts on american foreign policy, just posted some views and by the way GWB is the best comedian i know a better buffoon then you will ever be.

I would like to see you say that in person..

I would like to too.

I might be in Houston in the next few weeks..

[The_dip_sticks 0]

What are you talking about you buffoon. I have not started any posts on american foreign policy, just posted some views and by the way GWB is the best comedian i know a better buffoon then you will ever be.

I would like to see you say that in person..

I would like to too.

I might be in Houston in the next few weeks..

thats nice... but tell me when your in london as thats where i am. I will be more than willing to show you around all over the place

[Heracles 417]

What are you talking about you buffoon. I have not started any posts on american foreign policy, just posted some views and by the way GWB is the best comedian i know a better buffoon then you will ever be.

I would like to see you say that in person..

I would like to too.

I might be in Houston in the next few weeks..

thats nice... but tell me when your in london as thats where i am. I will be more than willing to show you around all over the place

Now that says it all.. You work anywhere near the docklands?

[Ban Hammer 13,364]

Difficult???, since the country is smaller than some states in the US and they have been there for 4 years and still found nothing and they have arrested practicaly everyone from the former bhathist party including deserters of some who gained safe havens in the US and UK and they still could not find them. I would safely say there isnt any there. Also I might add there were some 150 inspectors in Iraq. That would be like me saying the US nerve gassed the Iraqi's... I just havent found the evidence yet....lol... yes it is absured isnt it. Nice how you dodge the chemical question.

memory problems? link

third point - white phosphorous is not considered to be a chemical weapon. a chemical weapon is something along the lines of nerve agent, blister agent, and so on.

we'll just have to differ on many of those points, but concerning white phosphorous - here's a quote from wikipedia, aka the number 6 reference system

White phosphorus is a flare / smoke producing incendiary weapon,[1] or smoke-screening agent, made from a common allotrope of the chemical element phosphorus. White Phosphorus (WP) bombs and shells are essentially incendiary devices, but can also be used as an offensive anti-personnel flame compound capable of causing serious burns or death[2]. It is used in bombs, artillery shells, and mortar shells which burst into burning flakes of phosphorus upon impact. White Phosphorus is commonly referred to in military jargon as "WP". The Vietnam-era slang "Willy(ie) Pete" or "Willy(ie) Peter" is still occasionally heard.

White phosphorus weapons are controversial today because of its potential use against humans, for whom one-tenth of a gram is a deadly dose. In recent years, the US and Israel[3] have admitted using WP against enemy targets. Particularly, its use by the US, given the public stance against chemical weapons, has resulted in considerable controversy (see White phosphorus use in Iraq). Initial field reports from Iraq casually referred to White Phosphorus use against humans[4], but it was officially denied until November 2005[5].

Subsequently however, the Pentagon admitted [6] to its use while claiming that its use for smoke signals is legal and does not violate chemical weapon conventions[7]. However, a statement by a Pentagon spokesman says "It was used as an incendiary weapon against enemy combatants,"[8]

In any event, the United States is not a signatory to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, and even this mentions WP only in a Schedule[9], and not as a chemical weapon per se (more details below).

Effects on humans

White phosphorus can cause injuries and death in three ways: by burning deep into soft tissue, by being inhaled as a smoke and by being ingested. Extensive exposure in any way can be fatal.

link

Yes but that link still proves its a chemical weapon when used on persons. It says not a chemical weapon PER SAY meaning because it has another use unlike nerve gas for example which has only 1 use. But since it is a chemical and when used against people it is a weapon put the 2 words togather you get "chemical weapon"

Here are some more quotes from other links:

1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (signed by the US) prohibit the use of the CHEMICAL properties of white phosphorus against personnel.

According to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, quoted by the RAI documentary, WP is allowed as an illumination device, not as an offensive weapon, for which its chemical properties are put to use.

The link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Phantom_Fury

IRAQ HAS POSSIBLY EMPLOYED PHOSPHOROUS CHEMICAL WEAPONS AGAINST THE KURDISH POPULATION IN AREAS ALONG THE IRAQI-TURKISH-IRANIAN BORDERS. […]

link: http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/21/phosphorus-chemical/

there are more but im sure this will suffice. So yes per say its not a chemical weapon as it has another use but it is a CHEMICAL. So when used as a weapon than "chemical weapon"

You know its ok to call it a chemical weapon when sadam used it but not when a coalition force uses it, thats hypocracy. Lets just call it what it is who ever uses it.

um you don't know what a real chemical weapon is do you?

[Mags 112]

No more personal insults in this thread, please.

[AnaAndDaniel 0]

madonna is hawt!

err at least was.

Daniel

:enrgetic:

[The_dip_sticks 0]

Difficult???, since the country is smaller than some states in the US and they have been there for 4 years and still found nothing and they have arrested practicaly everyone from the former bhathist party including deserters of some who gained safe havens in the US and UK and they still could not find them. I would safely say there isnt any there. Also I might add there were some 150 inspectors in Iraq. That would be like me saying the US nerve gassed the Iraqi's... I just havent found the evidence yet....lol... yes it is absured isnt it. Nice how you dodge the chemical question.

memory problems? link

third point - white phosphorous is not considered to be a chemical weapon. a chemical weapon is something along the lines of nerve agent, blister agent, and so on.

we'll just have to differ on many of those points, but concerning white phosphorous - here's a quote from wikipedia, aka the number 6 reference system

White phosphorus is a flare / smoke producing incendiary weapon,[1] or smoke-screening agent, made from a common allotrope of the chemical element phosphorus. White Phosphorus (WP) bombs and shells are essentially incendiary devices, but can also be used as an offensive anti-personnel flame compound capable of causing serious burns or death[2]. It is used in bombs, artillery shells, and mortar shells which burst into burning flakes of phosphorus upon impact. White Phosphorus is commonly referred to in military jargon as "WP". The Vietnam-era slang "Willy(ie) Pete" or "Willy(ie) Peter" is still occasionally heard.

White phosphorus weapons are controversial today because of its potential use against humans, for whom one-tenth of a gram is a deadly dose. In recent years, the US and Israel[3] have admitted using WP against enemy targets. Particularly, its use by the US, given the public stance against chemical weapons, has resulted in considerable controversy (see White phosphorus use in Iraq). Initial field reports from Iraq casually referred to White Phosphorus use against humans[4], but it was officially denied until November 2005[5].

Subsequently however, the Pentagon admitted [6] to its use while claiming that its use for smoke signals is legal and does not violate chemical weapon conventions[7]. However, a statement by a Pentagon spokesman says "It was used as an incendiary weapon against enemy combatants,"[8]

In any event, the United States is not a signatory to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, and even this mentions WP only in a Schedule[9], and not as a chemical weapon per se (more details below).

Effects on humans

White phosphorus can cause injuries and death in three ways: by burning deep into soft tissue, by being inhaled as a smoke and by being ingested. Extensive exposure in any way can be fatal.

link

Yes but that link still proves its a chemical weapon when used on persons. It says not a chemical weapon PER SAY meaning because it has another use unlike nerve gas for example which has only 1 use. But since it is a chemical and when used against people it is a weapon put the 2 words togather you get "chemical weapon"

Here are some more quotes from other links:

1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (signed by the US) prohibit the use of the CHEMICAL properties of white phosphorus against personnel.

According to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, quoted by the RAI documentary, WP is allowed as an illumination device, not as an offensive weapon, for which its chemical properties are put to use.

The link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Phantom_Fury

IRAQ HAS POSSIBLY EMPLOYED PHOSPHOROUS CHEMICAL WEAPONS AGAINST THE KURDISH POPULATION IN AREAS ALONG THE IRAQI-TURKISH-IRANIAN BORDERS. […]

link: http://thinkprogress.org/2005/11/21/phosphorus-chemical/

there are more but im sure this will suffice. So yes per say its not a chemical weapon as it has another use but it is a CHEMICAL. So when used as a weapon than "chemical weapon"

You know its ok to call it a chemical weapon when sadam used it but not when a coalition force uses it, thats hypocracy. Lets just call it what it is who ever uses it.

um you don't know what a real chemical weapon is do you?

WordNet - Cite This Source chemical weapon

noun

chemical substances that can be delivered using munitions and dispersal devices to cause death or severe harm to people and animals and plants

thats the established deifinition. That fits right in thank you.

So now you knpw more then the ESTABLISHED definition i suppose...