Hillary, Bush, Global Warming, Iraq, Illegals...

[Nessa 23]

[no name 1]

you don't have to read it you know.

[Nessa 23]

I don't read them. I just read the same titles on the first page of OT. How come people have to make thread after thread with the same subject?

[no name 1]

I don't read them. I just read the same titles on the first page of OT. How come people have to make thread after thread with the same subject?

It's not, if you bothered to read them. I don't care about joke posts, but I didn't make a new post about it, I ignore it.

Most of it is very informative & makes for good debate.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I have to say I don't understand the need to create multiple threads on some of these topics when one will do just as well.

[pedroh 21]

I don't read them. I just read the same titles on the first page of OT. How come people have to make thread after thread with the same subject?

It's not, if you bothered to read them. I don't care about joke posts, but I didn't make a new post about it, I ignore it.

Most of it is very informative & makes for good debate.

debate? most 'articles' are sensationalist articles written by crazy people, either pro or against whatever you want.. they're usually full of sh!t.. like that last one about the North american union threatening the US sovereignity, how can there be any debate with sh!tty articles.. or like those 'OMG HILLARY IS A COMMUNIST'.. gimme a fukcin break..

if they were neutral articles that'd be a different thing.. but it's always some crazy o'reilly-esque leftist or rightist article full of dumb speculations..

Edited September 14, 2007 by pedroh

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I don't read them. I just read the same titles on the first page of OT. How come people have to make thread after thread with the same subject?

It's not, if you bothered to read them. I don't care about joke posts, but I didn't make a new post about it, I ignore it.

Most of it is very informative & makes for good debate.

debate? most 'articles' are sensationalist articles written by crazy people, either pro or against whatever you want.. they're usually full of sh!t.. like that last one about the North american union threatening the US sovereignity, how can there be any debate with sh!tty articles.. or like those 'OMG HILLARY IS A COMMUNIST'.. gimme a fukcin break..

if they were neutral articles that'd be a different thing.. but it's always some crazy o'reilly-esque leftist or rightist article full of dumb speculations..

Or even actual 'articles' rather than just yet another editorial.

[no name 1]

I don't read them. I just read the same titles on the first page of OT. How come people have to make thread after thread with the same subject?

It's not, if you bothered to read them. I don't care about joke posts, but I didn't make a new post about it, I ignore it.

Most of it is very informative & makes for good debate.

debate? most 'articles' are sensationalist articles written by crazy people, either pro or against whatever you want.. they're usually full of sh!t.. like that last one about the North american union threatening the US sovereignity, how can there be any debate with sh!tty articles.. or like those 'OMG HILLARY IS A COMMUNIST'.. gimme a fukcin break..

if they were neutral articles that'd be a different thing.. but it's always some crazy o'reilly-esque leftist or rightist article full of dumb speculations..

Or even actual 'articles' rather than just yet another editorial.

I love to attack the editorials.

[almaty 19]

sister nessa..i am with you...