About the visiting while k-1 is pending

[Sinergy 3]

im feeling the LOVE

[Fandango 1,439]

Give the Captain a chance, people.

I wonder if you could please define shortly as far as VJ is concerned because it's been 12 1/2 hours since Ewok said "shortly"

Hey! Consider it in light of other immigration times. Shortly = 30 - 90 days ... if you want to complain, please wait these minimums.

Shessh, these people are impatient.

Ahhh, of course. Silly me.

I should have realised this board had a workload delay equivalent to other immigration times.

If a topic needs closing or moving, of course that also takes 30 - 90 days.

Of course, none of this enhances the argument for at least one more admin like every other forum I have ever seen or been on, to make lesser priority tasks happen more quickly so to help keep the board running smoothly. [/sarcasm]

Not impatient. Thinking practically.

Practically speaking, a few people asked for a sticky (which to me clutters up the board and no one reads them anyway...) and E went beyond that with dedicating a new place in the guides. Why are you still upset?

I thought you said in your first post that you weren't going to 'defend your statements' but here ya are still complaining about it.

Or is it a case of finding anything to constantly criticize him no matter what, and to use that as a vehicle to complain about the site in general? cos that seems very en vogue with some here. If E doesn't want to add another admin, then he doesn't have to....and no amt of you asking for it will change that.

I wouldn't frequent a place I was apparently quite unhappy with, but hey that's just me I guess!

[LaL 418]

Eeeek - ok peeps, I think we can conclude that Ewok said he would do so, and did. Lets keep the topic on track of the wording of the section. Thanks!

[Krikit 1,164]

I'll help you if you'd like..we could split in in half if that makes it easier for you...

Sounds good. Thanks Lisa. Since we're both probably "free-time-challenged" we can just take it in sections. Ewok.... how would you like us to proceed? Take a section, make the corrections, and submit them to you or post them here?

[Fandango 1,439]

I'll help you if you'd like..we could split in in half if that makes it easier for you...

Sounds good. Thanks Lisa. Since we're both probably "free-time-challenged" we can just take it in sections. Ewok.... how would you like us to proceed? Take a section, make the corrections, and submit them to you or post them here?

Cool beans!

Sadly, I have all the time in the world at nightime

wait a minute, that should be a

I'll check back here later to see what E suggests....

[Sinergy 3]

Give the Captain a chance, people.

I wonder if you could please define shortly as far as VJ is concerned because it's been 12 1/2 hours since Ewok said "shortly"

Hey! Consider it in light of other immigration times. Shortly = 30 - 90 days ... if you want to complain, please wait these minimums.

Shessh, these people are impatient.

Ahhh, of course. Silly me.

I should have realised this board had a workload delay equivalent to other immigration times.

If a topic needs closing or moving, of course that also takes 30 - 90 days.

Of course, none of this enhances the argument for at least one more admin like every other forum I have ever seen or been on, to make lesser priority tasks happen more quickly so to help keep the board running smoothly. [/sarcasm]

Not impatient. Thinking practically.

Practically speaking, a few people asked for a sticky (which to me clutters up the board and no one reads them anyway...) and E went beyond that with dedicating a new place in the guides. Why are you still upset?

I thought you said in your first post that you weren't going to 'defend your statements' but here ya are still complaining about it.

Or is it a case of finding anything to constantly criticize him no matter what, and to use that as a vehicle to complain about the site in general? cos that seems very en vogue with some here. If E doesn't want to add another admin, then he doesn't have to....and no amt of you asking for it will change that.

I wouldn't frequent a place I was apparently quite unhappy with, but hey that's just me I guess!

Bc heaven forbid ppl not be bothered if their suggestions dont get choosen for consideration so therefore the need to bash E must have been in order lol.

Edited September 19, 2007 by Ionescu

[LaL 418]

*taps foot*

[Krikit 1,164]

*taps foot*

LOVE the hat, LaL. It's definitely you.

[Fandango 1,439]

Bc heaven forbid ppl not be bothered if their suggestions dont get choosen for consideration so therefore the need to bash E must have been in order lol.

But clearly the suggestion was considered & acted on....even moreso than just a mere sticky. It's just that it wasn't instantaneous...

And they're suggestions, not demands....there's a difference. And bashing E for not being at everyone's beck and call seems a bit strange to me.

Sorry Lal, I'm not tryin to start sh!t here, but I know Tara and I can have a discussion even while disagreeing without it turning into a sh!tfling...but if you would rather me start a seperate thread discussing this, then let me know!

But yeah, great hat

Edited September 19, 2007 by LisaD

[Sinergy 3]

Bc heaven forbid ppl not be bothered if their suggestions dont get choosen for consideration so therefore the need to bash E must have been in order lol.

But clearly the suggestion was considered & acted on....even moreso than just a mere sticky. It's just that it wasn't instantaneous...

And they're suggestions, not demands....there's a difference. And bashing E for not being at everyone's beck and call seems a bit strange to me.

Sorry Lal, I'm not tryin to start sh!t here, but I know Tara and I can have a discussion even while disagreeing without it turning into a sh!tfling...but if you would rather me start a seperate thread discussing this, then let me know!

But yeah, great hat

agreed, when we dont agree on stuff we have mature debates

and LAL OMG THE HAT

[no name 1]

You're correct Lisa. It's very mature to keep talking about it when Lal asked you to stop (twice).

Edited September 19, 2007 by devilette

[Mags 112]

S.T.O.P.

[Fandango 1,439]

What's that stand for, Mags? :P

seriously though, I'll keep my eyes on here to see how E wants us to help. As I said before, I'm down to edit if need be.

[Mags 112]

What's that stand for, Mags? :P

seriously though, I'll keep my eyes on here to see how E wants us to help. As I said before, I'm down to edit if need be.

Stop The "Orrible Posting.

[Sinergy 3]

E isnt able to be online 24/7 at the moment, lets cut him a bit of slack