Jump to content
Trompe le Monde

Thompson linked to Libyan bombers

 Share

28 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Well that was quick.

Bye Fred.

This makes him "linked" to the Lybians? 3.3 hour consultation to someone that is advising them? If thats all they got then I would say they got nothing.

You wouldn't be saying this if , say if Hilary consultated with Sean Padilla legal counsel for 3.3 hour. Nor should we be so glib that Thompson's helped defend the Pan Am bombers that killed 270 people, most Americans

No kidding. Let the skeletons come out, I'm sure there's plenty more where that came from. Illegimate kids next? He was quite the womanizer...

oh, but wait, Gary says the woman deserves that.

I'll give you one thing, you got guts. With the major scandals Mrs Scandal has been involved in, for you to latch onto this as some sort of a thing that "levels the playing field" with Fred it only shows how desperate you are. Go ahead and have your fun with this. Most people see it as the nothing it is.

BTW, Mrs Scandal got what she deserved when she stuck with Bill. I never said any woman that gets cheated on deserves it. But thats OK, you seem to enjoy taking everything I say out of context. It's all you seem to have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said, this kind of thing doesn't advance legitimate political debate one iota...although, as I also said, I am not convinced yet that the US presidential election is a political event.

Edited by Purple_Hibiscus

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
This wasn't aimed @ GaryC, but at the mudslinging as a form of 'political debate'.

There hasn't been any meaningful political debate in the run-up to elections as long as I can remember. It's always reduced to empty sound bites and to slinging that ole' mud like there's no tomorrow. I wish people would care about actual debates again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree brother reinhard///issues are an after thought

Peace to All creatures great and small............................................

But when we turn to the Hebrew literature, we do not find such jokes about the donkey. Rather the animal is known for its strength and its loyalty to its master (Genesis 49:14; Numbers 22:30).

Peppi_drinking_beer.jpg

my burro, bosco ..enjoying a beer in almaty

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...st&id=10835

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the media have an excuse, they are paid to provide entertainment, and it seems political mud slinging is entertaining. However, I did think that maybe, on a message board, it might be possible to rise above this...at least a little.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
There hasn't been any meaningful political debate in the run-up to elections as long as I can remember. It's always reduced to empty sound bites and to slinging that ole' mud like there's no tomorrow. I wish people would care about actual debates again.

Given what we saw in 2004 - the 'actors' are usually a bit better. Bush waiting for instructions on his in-ear mike and looking around desperately for his cue card got torn to pieces by Kerry. Even so - the standard of debate was laughable. Given Bush's performance its honestly amazing to me that people would vote for the guy.

If this is an electable candidate - I think that's really quite sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
Well that was quick.

Bye Fred.

This makes him "linked" to the Lybians? 3.3 hour consultation to someone that is advising them? If thats all they got then I would say they got nothing.

You wouldn't be saying this if , say if Hilary consultated with Sean Padilla legal counsel for 3.3 hour. Nor should we be so glib that Thompson's helped defend the Pan Am bombers that killed 270 people, most Americans

No kidding. Let the skeletons come out, I'm sure there's plenty more where that came from. Illegimate kids next? He was quite the womanizer...

oh, but wait, Gary says the woman deserves that.

I'll give you one thing, you got guts. With the major scandals Mrs Scandal has been involved in, for you to latch onto this as some sort of a thing that "levels the playing field" with Fred it only shows how desperate you are. Go ahead and have your fun with this. Most people see it as the nothing it is.

BTW, Mrs Scandal got what she deserved when she stuck with Bill. I never said any woman that gets cheated on deserves it. But thats OK, you seem to enjoy taking everything I say out of context. It's all you seem to have.

Sure you did. Any woman who stays by her man - knowing he is a womanizer - deserves the cheating & the fallout from it.

BTW, saying:

Most people see it as the nothing it is.

to families of 270 people killed by their actions is pretty callous & cruel.

Don't forget your (mispelled) name calling - that is all you have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I simply don't agree that giving legal advice as part of your contractual job obligations is some kind of sell out to the victims of Lockerbie. If he had done something underhanded, or against the rules, this would be something, but he didn't, and it's not.

I don't think anyone is interested in facts though, just trying to find some nice dirty mud.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More to the point, just because one person thinks it's appropriate to post ever more extreme examples of the 'unsuitability' of one particular candidate, is no reason to follow suit. Argue on the merits and policies not character flaws and personality.

Mind you, a head of state shouldn't be an electable post anyway, just a figure head, why not install an American Monarchy? :P:D

Edited by Purple_Hibiscus

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...