Jump to content
no name

THompson would over turn Roe V. Wade

 Share

161 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My views are totally consistent. This isn't a health care decision unless the abortion is done because carrying the baby to term would cause harm to the woman.

WHo pays for pre-natal care? Who pays for post-natal care if the baby has seriosu problems? Or the mother?

It is very much a healthcare issue.

Since this involves another human when an abortion is preformed (the baby) it must have some sort of legal oversight.

Abortions are not performed on babies. Embryos mostly, sometimes fetuses.

Uh huh, and since if left alone that embryo or fetus will become a human then it does involve 2 people.

Your saying that this isn't a human?

160_ap_human_fetus_file.jpg

We were not discussing late term abortions.....?

Thats a second trimester fetus. The ones you say have no rights.

Sorry, when did I say that? Oh yeah, I didn't.

Sorry, can you spin this a different way then?

Since this involves another human when an abortion is preformed (the baby) it must have some sort of legal oversight.

Abortions are not performed on babies. Embryos mostly, sometimes fetuses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats a second trimester fetus. The ones you say have no rights.

Sorry, when did I say that? Oh yeah, I didn't.

do you think fetuses have rights?

Not only rude, but very inappropriate to even ask.

It's a fair question when you consider your rights to your body conflict with the fetus's right to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
My views are totally consistent. This isn't a health care decision unless the abortion is done because carrying the baby to term would cause harm to the woman.

WHo pays for pre-natal care? Who pays for post-natal care if the baby has seriosu problems? Or the mother?

It is very much a healthcare issue.

Since this involves another human when an abortion is preformed (the baby) it must have some sort of legal oversight.

Abortions are not performed on babies. Embryos mostly, sometimes fetuses.

Uh huh, and since if left alone that embryo or fetus will become a human then it does involve 2 people.

Your saying that this isn't a human?

160_ap_human_fetus_file.jpg

We were not discussing late term abortions.....?

Thats a second trimester fetus. The ones you say have no rights.

Sorry, when did I say that? Oh yeah, I didn't.

Sorry, can you spin this a different way then?

Since this involves another human when an abortion is preformed (the baby) it must have some sort of legal oversight.

Abortions are not performed on babies. Embryos mostly, sometimes fetuses.

Stop twisting my words in your head, Gary. IT's NOT THERE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, he thinks the Senate wastes a lot of time on irrelevant matters, instead of doing things that are actually important. It's right there in the quote.

and he is right. The American congress and various political members are renowned for that. The country is literally falling apart, billions in debt to others etc but hey what is more important than gay marriage rights.. Or whether something is constitutional or not.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Thats a second trimester fetus. The ones you say have no rights.

Sorry, when did I say that? Oh yeah, I didn't.

do you think fetuses have rights?

Not only rude, but very inappropriate to even ask.

It's a fair question when you consider your rights to your body conflict with the fetus's right to live.

Gary, I will ask you once, politely, to stop bringing me into this. It's about the Supreme Court. NOT ME & my beliefs. :angry:

You go on & on how it's not what I believe, don't you dare speak for me. BLAH BLAH BLAH.

Guess what - IT GOES BOTH WAYS. :bonk:

Edited by devilette
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop twisting my words in your head, Gary. IT's NOT THERE.

I will ask you straight up. Does this fetus have a right to live? Or are your rights more important?

Thats a second trimester fetus. The ones you say have no rights.

Sorry, when did I say that? Oh yeah, I didn't.

do you think fetuses have rights?

Not only rude, but very inappropriate to even ask.

It's a fair question when you consider your rights to your body conflict with the fetus's right to live.

Gary, I will ask you once, politely, to stop bringing me into this. It's about the Supreme Court. NOT ME & my beliefs. :angry:

You go on & on how it's not what I believe, don't you dare speak for me. BLAH BLAH BLAH.

Guess what - IT GOES BOTH WAYS. :bonk:

Are you afraid of the question?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Vietnam
Timeline

Thats a second trimester fetus. The ones you say have no rights.

Sorry, when did I say that? Oh yeah, I didn't.

do you think fetuses have rights?

Not only rude, but very inappropriate to even ask.

The question is directly related to your answer there. Gary and I suspect, based on everything else you've said that you believe fetuses have no rights. That's why Gary made that statement. Come on, it wasn't exactly a leap to assume you would take that position was it? You coming out and saying you never said that gives me the impression that maybe in fact we were wrong to make this assumption, and therefore we can establish some common ground in the debate. But since your answer was a bit ambiguous, I sought clarification, rather than just make statements based on gut assumptions. Now how is that rude?

20-July -03 Meet Nicole

17-May -04 Divorce Final. I-129F submitted to USCIS

02-July -04 NOA1

30-Aug -04 NOA2 (Approved)

13-Sept-04 NVC to HCMC

08-Oc t -04 Pack 3 received and sent

15-Dec -04 Pack 4 received.

24-Jan-05 Interview----------------Passed

28-Feb-05 Visa Issued

06-Mar-05 ----Nicole is here!!EVERYBODY DANCE!

10-Mar-05 --US Marriage

01-Nov-05 -AOS complete

14-Nov-07 -10 year green card approved

12-Mar-09 Citizenship Oath Montebello, CA

May '04- Mar '09! The 5 year journey is complete!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think women carrying fetuses have the rights to make the best decision for themselves and fetus with their doctor and not anyone else, especially armchair political analysts.

I love rights. Everyone has rights. Right to choose etc..

Funnily enough it is everyone else who usually has to pick up the pieces when 'someone's' choices fail.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Stop twisting my words in your head, Gary. IT's NOT THERE.

I will ask you straight up. Does this fetus have a right to live? Or are your rights more important?

Gary - you made a very explicit point of not getting into the moral/ethical arguments of this. Why are you now trying to elicit that from others? If only care about the constitutional / states rights aspect - asking that question seems rather out of place. Whether she believes it or not.

Even if she were to answer it - would you be prepared to do likewise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Thats a second trimester fetus. The ones you say have no rights.

Sorry, when did I say that? Oh yeah, I didn't.

do you think fetuses have rights?

Not only rude, but very inappropriate to even ask.

The question is directly related to your answer there. Gary and I suspect, based on everything else you've said that you believe fetuses have no rights. That's why Gary made that statement. Come on, it wasn't exactly a leap to assume you would take that position was it? You coming out and saying you never said that gives me the impression that maybe in fact we were wrong to make this assumption, and therefore we can establish some common ground in the debate. But since your answer was a bit ambiguous, I sought clarification, rather than just make statements based on gut assumptions. Now how is that rude?

Stop putting words in my mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...