Never met my fiance but sent in the K-1 application

[Sinergy 3]

i wake up everyday hoping ppl in the world would become intelligent, the question on this thread just proved i should stop hoping

and i love Trainspotting

Oh and i doubt he has a disability. Please stop making excuses for ppl you dont know and who clearly didnt bother to read instructions. All this person did was write on the form and mail it in.

and OP, NO you will not get approved without meeting your fiance first. Thats not something you should be asking here, its common sense!!!

[Mags 112]

Does anyone really believe that this is NOT a troll? Yes there are a lot of dumbos out there -- but this is a case where the I-129F makes it CRYSTAL CLEAR that you have to prove you've met in the prior two years and describe that meeting. The form even clearly says "Explain also in detail any reasons you may have for requesting that the requirement that you and your fiancé(e) must have met should not apply to you".

I don't believe a real applicant filling out the form would just decide to skip that part.

My call = TROLL

I'd be inclined to agree except that I don't believe 90% of applicants read the instructions.

To the OP: if you haven't met in person, you'd have to demonstrate conclusively to USCIS why you haven't done so. You'd have to show either a religious or cultural reason that you couldn't meet (not just that you couldn't be alone together, but that you weren't permitted to meet), or you'd have to show something like a medical reason that prevented you from going to see her, and a reason that she couldn't come to see you, or that neither of you could go to a third country to meet. I don't remember the link, but there is a link that lists a bunch of arguments people have used. I can think of one success (disabled USC unable to travel at all, beneficiary unable to come to visit)... but who knows if they were able to demonstrate a bonafide relationship at the interview.

Thank you, Caladan for that reply. We must also remember that there are a couple of members of VJ who HADN'T met their SO at time of filing. Yes, they were denied initially, but they do exist.

I respectfully request that we please stop the "troll" comments in this thread. Thankyou.

[VISAHLP 0]

Hello,

unfortunately your telephone bills are not enough.

As K-1 visa is a United States non-immigrant visa benefiting fiancés and fiancées of US citizen petitioners. The Application is made by the petitioner in the US on a USCIS form I-129F filed by mail at a USCIS Service Center. The Applicant must provide detailed information and supporting documentation to establish that both parties are legally free to marry, have met each other, intend to marry, do not have disqualifying criminal histories (so-called crimes of moral turpitude), and proof of identity and citizenship. Recent changes to the Law also limit the number of petitions a Petitioner can make, and the Petitioner must not have a criminal history of sexual or partner abuse. Other recent changes in the Law also severely limit the role of "marriage agencies" in the introductions, and any involvement must be disclosed.

[Lona.C. 16]

AWWWWW I think you all scared the poor pup away , he hasnt even made a reply since the first post , lol you all rude ppl rude i tell ya , lmao this post had me in tears lmfao i think it was a joke to keep us ocupied give us something funny to read ,lol ( if it wasnt a joke I feel bad for the lost pup he coulda saved the cash bought a ticket to see his fiance and probly had a lil cash left to invite her for a big mac ) lol

[Mags 112]

AWWWWW I think you all scared the poor pup away , he hasnt even made a reply since the first post , lol you all rude ppl rude i tell ya , lmao this post had me in tears lmfao i think it was a joke to keep us ocupied give us something funny to read ,lol ( if it wasnt a joke I feel bad for the lost pup he coulda saved the cash bought a ticket to see his fiance and probly had a lil cash left to invite her for a big mac ) lol

I really don't think posts like this are necessary, especially considering that I requested people stop with the troll accusations just a few minutes beforehand.

[Lona.C. 16]

AWWWWW I think you all scared the poor pup away , he hasnt even made a reply since the first post , lol you all rude ppl rude i tell ya , lmao this post had me in tears lmfao i think it was a joke to keep us ocupied give us something funny to read ,lol ( if it wasnt a joke I feel bad for the lost pup he coulda saved the cash bought a ticket to see his fiance and probly had a lil cash left to invite her for a big mac ) lol

I really don't think posts like this are necessary, especially considering that I requested people stop with the troll accusations just a few minutes beforehand.

sorry " I do feel bad for the op "

[Mags 112]

AWWWWW I think you all scared the poor pup away , he hasnt even made a reply since the first post , lol you all rude ppl rude i tell ya , lmao this post had me in tears lmfao i think it was a joke to keep us ocupied give us something funny to read ,lol ( if it wasnt a joke I feel bad for the lost pup he coulda saved the cash bought a ticket to see his fiance and probly had a lil cash left to invite her for a big mac ) lol

I really don't think posts like this are necessary, especially considering that I requested people stop with the troll accusations just a few minutes beforehand.

sorry " I do feel bad for the op "

Okay, no problem.

[kitkat1 5]

I respectfully request that we please stop the "troll" comments in this thread. Thankyou.

Are you serious? Since when is it NOT ok to call out a troll? The OP posted a rather ridiculous question (yes we all define ridiculous differently and yes we all have different levels of intelligence and yes some of us have learning disabilities) that is 100% clear on the I-129F.

AND he has NOT returned.

Now is it against the unwritten VJ rules to call a spade a spade?

[chri'stina 190]

I have seen other people ask this question before over the years. It's not a new question. Just because they ask does not mean they are a troll. Yes they should have read the instructions better, and maybe tried to get away with it anyway even after reading the instructions. I don't usually read these threads but decided to read this one, and some of you have too much fun calling ppl trolls and making big judgments here. Maybe it's time you take a break from helping ppl in this section because you seem way too desensitized to ppl and their questions.

Does anyone really believe that this is NOT a troll? Yes there are a lot of dumbos out there -- but this is a case where the I-129F makes it CRYSTAL CLEAR that you have to prove you've met in the prior two years and describe that meeting. The form even clearly says "Explain also in detail any reasons you may have for requesting that the requirement that you and your fiancé(e) must have met should not apply to you".

I don't believe a real applicant filling out the form would just decide to skip that part.

My call = TROLL

I'd be inclined to agree except that I don't believe 90% of applicants read the instructions.

To the OP: if you haven't met in person, you'd have to demonstrate conclusively to USCIS why you haven't done so. You'd have to show either a religious or cultural reason that you couldn't meet (not just that you couldn't be alone together, but that you weren't permitted to meet), or you'd have to show something like a medical reason that prevented you from going to see her, and a reason that she couldn't come to see you, or that neither of you could go to a third country to meet. I don't remember the link, but there is a link that lists a bunch of arguments people have used. I can think of one success (disabled USC unable to travel at all, beneficiary unable to come to visit)... but who knows if they were able to demonstrate a bonafide relationship at the interview.

Thank you, Caladan for that reply. We must also remember that there are a couple of members of VJ who HADN'T met their SO at time of filing. Yes, they were denied initially, but they do exist.

I respectfully request that we please stop the "troll" comments in this thread. Thankyou.

AWWWWW I think you all scared the poor pup away , he hasnt even made a reply since the first post , lol you all rude ppl rude i tell ya , lmao this post had me in tears lmfao i think it was a joke to keep us ocupied give us something funny to read ,lol ( if it wasnt a joke I feel bad for the lost pup he coulda saved the cash bought a ticket to see his fiance and probly had a lil cash left to invite her for a big mac ) lol

I really don't think posts like this are necessary, especially considering that I requested people stop with the troll accusations just a few minutes beforehand.

I respectfully request that we please stop the "troll" comments in this thread. Thankyou.

Are you serious? Since when is it NOT ok to call out a troll? The OP posted a rather ridiculous question (yes we all define ridiculous differently and yes we all have different levels of intelligence and yes some of us have learning disabilities) that is 100% clear on the I-129F.

AND he has NOT returned.

Now is it against the unwritten VJ rules to call a spade a spade?

Something might not be a spade just because you think it is.

[no name 1]

I have seen other people ask this question before over the years. It's not a new question. Just because they ask does not mean they are a troll. Yes they should have read the instructions better, and maybe tried to get away with it anyway even after reading the instructions. I don't usually read these threads but decided to read this one, and some of you have too much fun calling ppl trolls and making big judgments here. Maybe it's time you take a break from helping ppl in this section because you seem way too desensitized to ppl and their questions.

And what you wrote is not just as judgemental? VJ Sheesh.

[Caladan 19]

Didn't we have an actual member who tried for a K-1 having not met her fiance?

[chri'stina 190]

I have seen other people ask this question before over the years. It's not a new question. Just because they ask does not mean they are a troll. Yes they should have read the instructions better, and maybe tried to get away with it anyway even after reading the instructions. I don't usually read these threads but decided to read this one, and some of you have too much fun calling ppl trolls and making big judgments here. Maybe it's time you take a break from helping ppl in this section because you seem way too desensitized to ppl and their questions.

And what you wrote is not just as judgemental? VJ Sheesh.

I don't care if it sounds judgmental, it is what it is.

[no name 1]

I have seen other people ask this question before over the years. It's not a new question. Just because they ask does not mean they are a troll. Yes they should have read the instructions better, and maybe tried to get away with it anyway even after reading the instructions. I don't usually read these threads but decided to read this one, and some of you have too much fun calling ppl trolls and making big judgments here. Maybe it's time you take a break from helping ppl in this section because you seem way too desensitized to ppl and their questions.

And what you wrote is not just as judgemental? VJ Sheesh.

I don't care if it sounds judgmental, it is what it is.

You just did exactly what you accused others of!!!

[chri'stina 190]

I have seen other people ask this question before over the years. It's not a new question. Just because they ask does not mean they are a troll. Yes they should have read the instructions better, and maybe tried to get away with it anyway even after reading the instructions. I don't usually read these threads but decided to read this one, and some of you have too much fun calling ppl trolls and making big judgments here. Maybe it's time you take a break from helping ppl in this section because you seem way too desensitized to ppl and their questions.

And what you wrote is not just as judgemental? VJ Sheesh.

I don't care if it sounds judgmental, it is what it is.

You just did exactly what you accused others of!!!

If people think so, I am fine with that. What I said needed to be said.

[kitkat1 5]

If people think so, I am fine with that. What I said needed to be said.

And if people think I'm "having fun calling ppl trolls and making big judgments here" and "seem way too desensitized to ppl and their questions" then I am fine with that. I said what needed to be said -- that it's EXTREMELY likely that the OP is a troll.