Homeland Security Muck-Up

[PsychoKat 0]

I think if he had been doing it at work the Federal Police would have nabbed him at work, not at his home.

Plus, I sure if there was any proof of him breathin heavy on the phone or yanking on the joy stick while on the computer at work it wouldn't have been left out of the story.

I'm not saying what he did if true is right, just that you can't assume he was a slacker at work or hang this on DHS.

In todays article on cnn regarding this there is a quote that appears to indicate that he was infact doing this at work.

Before Doyle was arrested Tuesday night at his home in Silver Spring, Judd said, the detective had told him that she had access to a Web camera and that her mother would be away, so "he was eager to rush home from work."

Seems to me like that is saying he wanted to get home from work so he could talk to her, not that he was doing it at work.

Either way, what he did was obviously wrong and he should get the appropriate punishment.

Reading it over again, I'm not sure although it says he wanted to rush home for that, it also says this had been going on since March 12 and consisted of multiple conversations online, and also phone contact so it's not that clear

[Hilarious Clinton 452]

I wish I were 14 again.

[almaty 19]

perverts come from all backgrounds and job types..

[Dixie_Peach 1]

Ideal (though unrealistic) punishment for that chopf#ck would be to revoke his citizenship and make him an illegal.

Slightly less than ideal--lock him in the same cell with a group of illegals caught in the act of committing felonies; they'll give him his just desserts quickly enough!

[almaty 19]

Ideal (though unrealistic) punishment for that chopf#ck would be to revoke his citizenship and make him an illegal.

Slightly less than ideal--lock him in the same cell with a group of illegals caught in the act of committing felonies; they'll give him his just desserts quickly enough!

i agree also sister lynee..brother sriniv has the best idea

[pedroh 21]

[David and Karen 0]

I'm not saying what he did if true is right, just that you can't assume he was a slacker at work or hang this on DHS.

Oh boy! Right...so I have it clear...he isn't a "slacker" just and online sex suspect. Got it!!

As a government employee I just think that what you do on your own time isn't any of work's business. If I put in 8 hours and do my job they have nothing to say if want to go home and drown cats. Not that I would ever drown a cat. They swim too well. LOL

Well perhaps going home and drowning kittens is ok to you. But consider if you were employed by a veterinarians office they may find that as just cause to dismiss you should they find out. On the clock or not!

I heard this morning why he's been taken off the job. He had a security clearance and they pulled his clearance. In that case I agree that this should affect his job, because in a secure job you aren't supposed to be telling people where you work, especially to some kid over the Internet.

Right and just disregard the fact that he is considered a suspect in child seduction online. Gimme a break! Perhaps the beat of the investigation is whether or not he committed an illegal act....seperate and apart from some security clearance.

[bucknekkid 0]

I'm not saying what he did if true is right, just that you can't assume he was a slacker at work or hang this on DHS.

Oh boy! Right...so I have it clear...he isn't a "slacker" just and online sex suspect. Got it!!

As a government employee I just think that what you do on your own time isn't any of work's business. If I put in 8 hours and do my job they have nothing to say if want to go home and drown cats. Not that I would ever drown a cat. They swim too well. LOL

Well perhaps going home and drowning kittens is ok to you. But consider if you were employed by a veterinarians office they may find that as just cause to dismiss you should they find out. On the clock or not!

I heard this morning why he's been taken off the job. He had a security clearance and they pulled his clearance. In that case I agree that this should affect his job, because in a secure job you aren't supposed to be telling people where you work, especially to some kid over the Internet.

Right and just disregard the fact that he is considered a suspect in child seduction online. Gimme a break! Perhaps the beat of the investigation is whether or not he committed an illegal act....seperate and apart from some security clearance.

All valid points and well said...

What was this fella thinking?...