Jump to content

41 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Thread is moved from the K-1 Process forum to the Embassy/Consulate forum -- topic regards that phase.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Egypt
Timeline
Posted
5 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Whatever else you submit, get to your fiancee several days early and take (and print) copious photos together, gather as many mutual receipts as possible, and everything else you can think of, and absolutely overwhelm them at the consular window with current evidence.  This does NOT sound good at all.

Why?
Are we the first ones to have this type of circumstance?

You never heard of it. Why does not sound good?  

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

I never heard of a consulate rejecting "proof of bona fide relationship" before an interview.

We had ours rejected at the first interview, regardless of the reality that USCIS had seen it with the I-129F.

Fiancee even brought more along, but they refused to consider it and kicked her out without even a 221(g).

Consulates are not supposed to reject evidence that they know USCIS has seen.

My presumption is that there are red flags, or a rogue CO, or known or unknown standards to be met.

 

Maybe I'm completely misunderstanding what's going on.

I'm going to enlist someone knowledgeable and invite him to join this thread.

Meanwhile, begin collecting absolutely everything that you can get your hands on that supports the relationship.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
2 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

I never heard of a consulate rejecting "proof of bona fide relationship" before an interview.

 

Yeah that's what got me.... never heard of a 221g being issued without an interview being conducted

K1 Visa
EventDate

Service Center: California Service Center

Consulate: Manila, Philippines

I-129F NOA1: 2023-09-20

I-129F NOA2: 2024-06-11

US Entry: 2024-08-30

Marriage: 2024-10-25

 

Adjustment of Status

CIS Office: Denver CO

Date Filed: 2024-11-18

NOA Date: 2024-11-21

RFE(s) :

Bio. Appt.: 2024-12-26

 

Employment Authorization Document

Event/Date

CIS Office: NBC

Date Filed: 2024-11-18

Bio. Appt.: 2024-12-26

Approved Date: 2025-01-08

Date Card Received: 2025-01-18

Comments: Card Produced 2025-01-15
Estimates/Stats: Your EAD was approved in 51 days.

 

Comments : Phoenix, AZ LockBox - NOA1 Received in mail 12/02/24 - Biometrics completed 12/26/24 - I-765 Approved 01/08/2025 - EAD Card Received 01/18/2025

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Egypt
Timeline
Posted
1 minute ago, Edward and Jaycel said:

 

Yeah that's what got me.... never heard of a 221g being issued without an interview being conducted

Do you think it could be a mistake?
Last week, they sent me an email with our interview to be in the next few months.

Then today they sent us the form of 221g in white color. We have never had an interview yet.
They sent us our pictures back and asked us to bring them to the interview.

Our case still says "Ready". 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
7 minutes ago, ShawnSpiker said:

Do you think it could be a mistake?

It would be a helluva massive one, if so.

 

1.   It was your evidence and not someone else's, correct?

2.  Everything they returned had been in your I-129F petition, correct?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Egypt
Timeline
Posted
6 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

It would be a helluva massive one, if so.

 

1.   It was your evidence and not someone else's, correct?

2.  Everything they returned had been in your I-129F petition, correct?

I hope it was a mistake.

1. Yes, it was my evidence with my fiancé printed on A3 size paper.
2. Yes, but we added more pictures and evidence, and they returned everything to us.

What is your advice far from collecting more evidence?
Is that normal that they sent us our pictures or evidence back?
Why are they keeping the interview then? And requesting to provide everything at the interview itself?
Should I contact them via email directly? Should I question everything?

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Advice:  Collect everything possible; more crucial when you arrive early and are together.

Normal:  Never heard of this.

Why:       Mistake?  Rogue CO?  New IV Visa Chief with new procedures?  Just wild guesses.

Contact:  Let's wait a bit to see if our expert chimes in.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted
7 hours ago, ShawnSpiker said:

Why?
Are we the first ones to have this type of circumstance?

You never heard of it. Why does not sound good?  

In 9 years of reading VJ, I’ve never heard of a 221g being issued by a consulate prior to an interview.   Seems as if they are fixing to issue a NOID and return the petition to USCIS.

 

How much in-person time have you had?

Posted

What Jan said makes a lot of sense- and is quite charitable if they are actually giving you a chance to strengthen your case prior to the interview.   That’s really unheard of.

 

My other thought was that it was in error.   Either way, gathering additional high quality (in-person) evidence prior to July is the right move.   Good luck!

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Egypt
Timeline
Posted
17 minutes ago, SalishSea said:

In 9 years of reading VJ, I’ve never heard of a 221g being issued by a consulate prior to an interview.   Seems as if they are fixing to issue a NOID and return the petition to USCIS.

 

How much in-person time have you had?

More than two years.
Suppose they are fixing to issue NOID, why are they keeping the interview appointment?
Why did they return our pictures and ask us to have them at the interview?

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Egypt
Timeline
Posted
20 minutes ago, SalishSea said:

What Jan said makes a lot of sense- and is quite charitable if they are actually giving you a chance to strengthen your case prior to the interview.   That’s really unheard of.

 

My other thought was that it was in error.   Either way, gathering additional high quality (in-person) evidence prior to July is the right move.   Good luck!

Thank you.

Since no one has heard or experienced such circumstances before, should I question them through emails? Or even ask what we should prepare exactly since they sent us back all the pictures, chat, tickets, etc.?

I mean, was it wrong that we sent pictures before the interview?

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
45 minutes ago, ShawnSpiker said:

Suppose they are fixing to issue NOID, why are they keeping the interview appointment?

The participant here perhaps didn't read the entire thread before posting.  Heed what jan22 says.

37 minutes ago, ShawnSpiker said:

should I question them through emails? Or even ask what we should prepare exactly since they sent us back all the pictures, chat, tickets, etc.?

The question is:  Were all of the above part of the I-129F petition that Cairo got from USCIS, or did you somehow send these materials separately, yourself, directly to Cairo in advance of your interview?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Egypt
Timeline
Posted
36 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

The participant here perhaps didn't read the entire thread before posting.  Heed what jan22 says.

The question is:  Were all of the above part of the I-129F petition that Cairo got from USCIS, or did you somehow send these materials separately, yourself, directly to Cairo in advance of your interview?

Yes, I sent these materials separately, myself, directly to Cairo in advance of your interview.
They did not ask for it to be sent.
Still, though they could just return it without the 221g letter, right?

I mean, should I contact them or wait and see in July?

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...