221g for Mother In Law

[pushbrk 13,242]

7 minutes ago, defeedme said:

correct, and the "interviewing officer" may have personal reasons for denial. 

Maybe but that doesn't help with a solution.  Back to productivity if you please.

 

So, did you indicate you are both employed and self employed?

In the tax section, did you enter the number from the "total income" line of your 1040s?

For real Estate assets, did you include documentation of their value and mortgage?

For real estate, did  you state only the value of the equity?

Do you and your wife file joint federal tax returns?

 

We don't need to know all the details and values.  You are both employed and a self employed investor/landlord  That's the nature and sources of your income.  Please answer the follow-up questions above.

[OldUser 8,051]

9 minutes ago, defeedme said:

welp points taken, apparently this forum has some limitations & censorship that most don't in 2025. I guess you approve of the cleavland baseball team that was forced to change their name also. I would have to bet you are not a supporter of President Trump.  

The VJ rules precede Trump by few decades. AFAIK, these rules almost never change here regardless of administration in the house.

[Lil bear 4,375]

18 minutes ago, defeedme said:

correct, and the "interviewing officer" may have personal reasons for denial. 

Attributing personal bias isn’t helpful 

I’m done. 

[Ban Hammer 13,710]

as the OP has not been forthcoming in providing answers to information requests despite being on this site since the last post in
this thread, this thread is now locked to further replies.

given the lack of additional information, the best way forward for the OP would be from the following advice:

On 2/24/2025 at 7:57 PM, Boiler said:

I can't help but think you need to leave this is the hands of your Legal team.

*****WARNING*****
do not restart this thread or reference it in another thread under penalty of admin action.

charles
vj moderation

Edited Thursday at 04:47 PM by Ban Hammer