Jump to content

7 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Serbia
Timeline
Posted

Hello friends,

My fiance and I are looking to start the K-1 process soon.

One thing that we have really been wanting to do is to travel together towards the end of the process, we think of it as a honeymoon before we get married because leaving the US would be difficult for a while from what I understand until AOS is complete.

Since we have multiple willing cosponsors, would her quitting her job for the purpose of spending time together affect the process in any way or is this something we would just have to report at a certain point?

I assume that when filing the documents at my local consulate, that is also the place I would have to interview and collect the visa from? Our goal was to travel to China for several months, but based on everything I have read this would have to be between when the visa is issued but before it expires, and I would not be able to interview together with her at a different consulate in China?

Thank you in advance!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Welcome to the forum!  You ask good questions and have obviously read and studied here, which is great.

12 hours ago, Premi said:

a honeymoon before we get married

Good idea, and you're right about the restrictions for a long time after U.S. entry.

12 hours ago, Premi said:

would her quitting her job for the purpose of spending time together affect the process in any way

It's the petitioner who would quit?  I wouldn't recommend this; it's best to show some current income regardless of cosponsorship.  Others here might have differing opinions.

12 hours ago, Premi said:

when filing the documents at my local consulate, that is also the place I would have to interview and collect the visa from

Yes.

12 hours ago, Premi said:

(1) this would have to be between when the visa is issued but before it expires

(2) and I would not be able to interview together with her at a different consulate in China

(1) Perhaps, and (2) correct.  If you want to travel together shortly after filing the I-129F petition, there will typically be all kinds of time, because approval typically takes many months.  However, sometimes petitions are pulled from their position and are processed earlier than usual, so you would want to be flexibly alert to this possibility.

 

Whether you travel before the approved petition reaches the consulate or you travel between the visa's issuance and expiration, maybe shorten the vacation.  And, for heaven's sake, do NOT leave less than 3 days' validity on the issued visa before U.S. entry!  Flights can be delayed because of weather, mechanical reasons, civil strife, and more.  Remember, too, that the visa will be valid for 6 months from the date of the medical examination, not from the interview itself, so commit the expiration date to memory, and plan accordingly.

Edited by TBoneTX
clarity

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Serbia
Timeline
Posted

Thank you for the very thorough response!

It's a shame about the requirement of income, as we were thinking to even live together in my country for a couple of months while waiting for the process and even attending the interview together, it's disheartening to hear that we may need to be apart longer or spend more money on multiple shorter trips but I appreciate the information.

The last part of your response is also a very important reminder and something I didn't really consider or read about, knowing when the visa expires and not risking failure after all the wait just by cutting it too close.

Thanks again!

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Premi said:

It's a shame about the requirement of income, 

US government needs to ensure immigrant won't become a public charge. Hence income requirement.

 

1 hour ago, Premi said:

 as we were thinking to even live together in my country for a couple of months while waiting for the process 

US immigrant visas are given to reunite US citizens with their immidiate relative. If you're already united outside the US, there's no reason for DOS to give US visa. US citizen should also demonstrate domicile in the US, e.g. prove they live there.

 

1 hour ago, Premi said:

and even attending the interview together

 

This is typically a bad idea. Most of the times, consulate won't let anybody else in to the building other than foreigner seeking visa. And when they do let US citizen spouse in, there's a risk of Stokes interview. E.g. separating you and your spouse, asking same questions and comparing the answers. If the answers don't match, you're marriage legitimacy is questioned. Questions may include but not limited to color of carpet in the bedroom, spouse's third cousin full name, how spouse gets to work and many other questions that could throw off even couple living together for years.

 

Edited by OldUser
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Serbia
Timeline
Posted
6 minutes ago, OldUser said:

This is typically a bad idea.


Not something that would have ever crossed our mind, thank you for the insight, all of the things you explained make perfect sense from the perspective of the government.

Looks like this period of waiting and missing each other might be something most couples navigating this process have to experience.

I'm glad I asked these questions and explained my reasoning, because finding this information online isn't always straightforward, I appreciate your answers as well.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Netherlands
Timeline
Posted

I'm not sure exactly if every consulate does the same thing, but mine did, I had to leave my passport with them after I got approved for the K1 visa, and I didn't get it back until a week+ later. Just incase you were considering traveling right after the interview!

Submitted i-129F: 12-4-23
Received/NOA1: 01-31-24
Approved/NOA2: 06-05-24

Medical Exam: 08-06-24
Interview: 09-13-24 APPROVED
Visa in hand: 09-23-24
Moving date: 11-02-24
Married: 01-03-25
AOS Filed: 01-28-25

 

Biggest delay so far: requested SSN on 13th of November, never received the card, got the number in person Jan 16th.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted (edited)

I take respectful yet vehement exception to OldUser's recommendation against the petitioner's showing up at the first interview.  (The rest of his advice, as usual, is excellent.)

 

I have never heard of a Stokes interrogation being called for as part of a first interview.  It's only when a 221g is issued and fraud is suspected (or, as in my instance and that of my contemporaries, the consulate's Immigrant Visa Unit is appallingly mismanaged) that a second interview is called for, with the petitioner's mandatory attendance.  This is when a Stokes would likely occur.

 

There is no drawback when the petitioner is on the consular premises during a first interview.  The beneficiary can take the petitioner's U.S. passport to show the consul, saying, "He/she is outside, if you have questions."  This lends legitimacy to your bona fide relationship, and it enables the consul to clear up questions with the petitioner then and there, rather than issuing a 221g for desired information and engendering days or weeks of delay before the visa is granted.

 

The above is presented for your consideration.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...