Travelling outside US during presidential change. Risk of re entry

[JeanneAdil 6,579]

16 hours ago, Alexmat1 said:

I meant they can deport you. CBP can turn away GC and send them back. They have in some cases misled people to sign a form (which says they are renouncing GC). But in my case I wont sign anything, but they can still sent me back and my query was can I then ask for a day in court or ask for immigration attorney assistance (mine or theirs).

they have when the LPR has stayed way too long outside of the US

 

https://www.help.cbp.gov/s/article/Article-1430?language=en_US

 

If you intend to stay outside the United States for 1 year or more, you must apply for a re-entry permit with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) prior to leaving the United States. A re-entry permit allows a lawful permanent resident or conditional permanent resident to apply for admission to the United States upon returning from abroad during the permit’s validity without the need to obtain a returning resident visa from a U.S. Embassy or U.S. Consulate. Re-entry permits are generally valid for 2 years from the date of issuance. Therefore, if you are outside of the United States longer than the date the permit was issued, you may be denied entry into the United States.
 

[Alexmat1 9]

12 hours ago, JeanneAdil said:

they have when the LPR has stayed way too long outside of the US

 

https://www.help.cbp.gov/s/article/Article-1430?language=en_US

 

If you intend to stay outside the United States for 1 year or more, you must apply for a re-entry permit with the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) prior to leaving the United States. A re-entry permit allows a lawful permanent resident or conditional permanent resident to apply for admission to the United States upon returning from abroad during the permit’s validity without the need to obtain a returning resident visa from a U.S. Embassy or U.S. Consulate. Re-entry permits are generally valid for 2 years from the date of issuance. Therefore, if you are outside of the United States longer than the date the permit was issued, you may be denied entry into the United States.
 

I only intend to stay for 2 months max. Wouldnt risk staying any longer in the near future with new administration coming up with many major changes to immigration. 

[JeanneAdil 6,579]

10 hours ago, Alexmat1 said:

I only intend to stay for 2 months max. Wouldnt risk staying any longer in the near future with new administration coming up with many major changes to immigration. 

he can do executive order if there is a threat to our country

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C18-8-1/ALDE_00001255/#:~:text=Even so%2C the Supreme Court's,implicate matters of national security.

 

Long-standing Supreme Court precedent recognizes Congress as having plenary power over immigration, giving it almost complete authority to decide whether foreign nationals (aliens, under governing statutes and case law) may enter or remain in the United States.¹ But while Congress’s power over immigration is well established, defining its constitutional underpinnings is more difficult. The Constitution does not mention immigration, but parts of the Constitution address related subjects. The Supreme Court has sometimes relied upon Congress’s powers over naturalization (the term and conditions in which an alien becomes a U.S. citizen),² foreign commerce,³ and, to a lesser extent, upon the Executive Branch’s implied Article II foreign affairs power,⁴ as sources of federal immigration power.⁵ While these powers continue to be cited as supporting the immigration power, since the late nineteenth century, the Supreme Court has described the power as flowing from the Constitution’s establishment of a federal government.⁶ The United States government possesses all the powers incident to a sovereign, including unqualified authority over the Nation’s borders and the ability to determine whether foreign nationals may come within its territory.⁷ The Supreme Court has generally assigned the constitutional power to regulate immigration to Congress, with executive authority mainly derived from congressional delegations of authority.⁸Long-standing Supreme Court precedent recognizes Congress as having plenary power over immigration, giving it almost complete authority to decide whether foreign nationals (aliens, under governing statutes and case law) may enter or remain in the United States.¹ But while Congress’s power over immigration is well established, defining its constitutional underpinnings is more difficult. The Constitution does not mention immigration, but parts of the Constitution address related subjects. The Supreme Court has sometimes relied upon Congress’s powers over naturalization (the term and conditions in which an alien becomes a U.S. citizen),² foreign commerce,³ and, to a lesser extent, upon the Executive Branch’s implied Article II foreign affairs power,⁴ as sources of federal immigration power.⁵ While these powers continue to be cited as supporting the immigration power, since the late nineteenth century, the Supreme Court has described the power as flowing from the Constitution’s establishment of a federal government.⁶ The United States government possesses all the powers incident to a sovereign, including unqualified authority over the Nation’s borders and the ability to determine whether foreign nationals may come within its territory.⁷ The Supreme Court has generally assigned the constitutional power to regulate immigration to Congress, with executive authority mainly derived from congressional delegations of authority.⁸

[Alexmat1 9]

On 12/15/2024 at 7:30 PM, OldUser said:

Which citizenship? LPRs are not US citizens, it would be a painful mistake to call yourself US citizen when only LPR.

CBP cannot revoke or demand to renounce any other foreign citizenships.

Its a typo . I meant CBP hands over forms asking LPRs to sign that will denounce their green card.