Jump to content
CCG1991

U4U Parole with girlfriend from a different country

By CCG1991 in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus

 Share

10 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

CCG1991 Apprentice

CCG1991   5

Posted
Timeline
Posted

Hi, 

I met this couple that touched my heart who I would like to sponsor. 

He is ukrainian but his girlfriend is from Moldova, a non-ukrainin national. She has never been to Ukraine and they met in Moldova through the refugee center. 

Would she qualify to join him in case the application gets approved? 

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Family Experienced

Family   3,818

Posted
Timeline
Posted
12 minutes ago, CCG1991 said:

Hi, 

I met this couple that touched my heart who I would like to sponsor. 

He is ukrainian but his girlfriend is from Moldova, a non-ukrainin national. She has never been to Ukraine and they met in Moldova through the refugee center. 

Would she qualify to join him in case the application gets approved? 

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Only if he Puts a Ring on It..and is married 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SalishSea Grand Master

SalishSea   17,383

Posted
Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: New Zealand
 Timeline
Posted
3 hours ago, CCG1991 said:

Hi, 

I met this couple that touched my heart who I would like to sponsor. 

He is ukrainian but his girlfriend is from Moldova, a non-ukrainin national. She has never been to Ukraine and they met in Moldova through the refugee center. 

Would she qualify to join him in case the application gets approved? 

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Nope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CCG1991 Apprentice

CCG1991   5

Posted
Timeline
  • Author
Posted

This is not for me to decide or even suggest what these poor people will do with their lives. USCIS claims common law partners can be eligible, it is why I posted the question. I don't understand why there is a need to repost the same answer multiple times, in a derogatory way, with videos.  We're talking about people who lost everything. Read the room. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Boiler Grand Master

Boiler   44,700

Posted
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
 Timeline
Posted
1 minute ago, CCG1991 said:

This is not for me to decide or even suggest what these poor people will do with their lives. USCIS claims common law partners can be eligible, it is why I posted the question. I don't understand why there is a need to repost the same answer multiple times, in a derogatory way, with videos.  We're talking about people who lost everything. Read the room. 

She is Moldovan living in Moldova, they met in Moldova.

 

What has she lost?

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   44,391

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted

A noncontributory post has been removed.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   44,391

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted

A post violating the site's Terms of Service has been removed, along with one quoting it.

 

The OP is asked to avoid taking offense, and respondents are asked to reply respectfully in line with the OP's questions.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   44,391

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted

CCG, it's admirable that you want to help this couple.  It seems that they must marry if the woman is to be included, or if she's to have a fair shot at being included.

 

To clarify, they met "through" a refugee center; was she also a refugee?  If not, what did she lose?  You don't need to relay the story of their lives; folks here are trying to learn some basic details in case there's a resourceful way of getting around the "must be married to her" issue.  Can you please clarify?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CCG1991 Apprentice

CCG1991   5

Posted
Timeline
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, TBoneTX said:

CCG, it's admirable that you want to help this couple.  It seems that they must marry if the woman is to be included, or if she's to have a fair shot at being included.

 

To clarify, they met "through" a refugee center; was she also a refugee?  If not, what did she lose?  You don't need to relay the story of their lives; folks here are trying to learn some basic details in case there's a resourceful way of getting around the "must be married to her" issue.  Can you please clarify?

She has no family and a lot of health issues, but since marriage is a must in this case,  then I can find different ways to help them out. Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Family Experienced

Family   3,818

Posted
Timeline
Posted
22 minutes ago, CCG1991 said:

This is not for me to decide or even suggest what these poor people will do with their lives. USCIS claims common law partners can be eligible, it is why I posted the question. I don't understand why there is a need to repost the same answer multiple times, in a derogatory way, with videos.  We're talking about people who lost everything. Read the room. 


I must apologize. Your statement on common law partners for U4U is indeed out there. ..and I had not looked at the site for a bit. 
Everyone responding is assuming IR/ immediate relatives is constrained to the usual USCIS definition….not applicable in this case.

 

You should try submitting the application for them and so you will have a chance to email back and forth w support
 

https://www.uscis.gov/ukraine

The Ukrainian citizen (or their non-Ukrainian immediate family member) who is outside the United States and who may be considered for parole under Uniting for Ukraine.

Immediate family members in this process include:

  • the spouse or common-law partner of a Ukrainian citizen; and
  • their unmarried children under the age of 21. NOTE: If a child is under 18, they must be traveling with a parent or legal guardian in order to use this process.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...