Jump to content

85 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
Too bad that posting in VJ isn't a calorie burner...I'd be skinny as a rail.

...

I think health insurance companies can and should adjust people's premiums based on voluntarily lifestyle habits that are detrimental to their health, but not employers. This is another consequence of having employers taking on the responsibility of our healthcare. If we had universal healthcare in this country - this would be a non-issue with employers.

I thought you hated insurance companies?

"I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine."- Ayn Rand

“Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.”

― Andrew Wilkow

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted (edited)
Too bad that posting in VJ isn't a calorie burner...I'd be skinny as a rail.

...

I think health insurance companies can and should adjust people's premiums based on voluntarily lifestyle habits that are detrimental to their health, but not employers. This is another consequence of having employers taking on the responsibility of our healthcare. If we had universal healthcare in this country - this would be a non-issue with employers.

I thought you hated insurance companies?

edited: See you Bush lovin' types are stuck in this neo-natal view of ....I hate this, I love that. I try to keep my views rooted in rationale, rather than pure emotion.

Edited by Mister Fancypants
Filed: Timeline
Posted

It's interesting what employers will and will not do. A good number of larger employers offer a carrot approach (both in a subtle and overt way). To see this company use a stick method is interesting. Certain employers can dictate (as much as you can to a health insurance company) what will be covered and what will not - for instance, student health insurance at a good number of Catholic universities (and employee health insruance also actually) will not, in many cases, cover birth control.

I would be interested to read the fine print. It's much easier from a legal standpoint to encourage someone to work out (offering fitness challenges, and free gym membership for instance) than it is to financially punish those who are not healthy.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
Too bad that posting in VJ isn't a calorie burner...I'd be skinny as a rail.

...

I think health insurance companies can and should adjust people's premiums based on voluntarily lifestyle habits that are detrimental to their health, but not employers. This is another consequence of having employers taking on the responsibility of our healthcare. If we had universal healthcare in this country - this would be a non-issue with employers.

my question is - who determines what is detrimental or not? i think riding a motorcycle is detrimental, especially without a helmet. others will disagree, i'm sure, but it illustrates that what each individual believes to be detrimental varies. leave it up to the businesses to decide what is or isn't and guess what - we'll all have a boring life (i'm sure all of the typing i do on vj would indict me for carpal tunnel syndrome :lol:)

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Too bad that posting in VJ isn't a calorie burner...I'd be skinny as a rail.

...

I think health insurance companies can and should adjust people's premiums based on voluntarily lifestyle habits that are detrimental to their health, but not employers. This is another consequence of having employers taking on the responsibility of our healthcare. If we had universal healthcare in this country - this would be a non-issue with employers.

I thought you hated insurance companies?

edited: See you Bush lovin' types are stuck in this neo-natal view of ....I hate this, I love that. I try to keep my views rooted in rationale, rather than pure emotion.

just go shag Bush and get it over with! Sheesh :lol:

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
Too bad that posting in VJ isn't a calorie burner...I'd be skinny as a rail.

...

I think health insurance companies can and should adjust people's premiums based on voluntarily lifestyle habits that are detrimental to their health, but not employers. This is another consequence of having employers taking on the responsibility of our healthcare. If we had universal healthcare in this country - this would be a non-issue with employers.

my question is - who determines what is detrimental or not? i think riding a motorcycle is detrimental, especially without a helmet. others will disagree, i'm sure, but it illustrates that what each individual believes to be detrimental varies. leave it up to the businesses to decide what is or isn't and guess what - we'll all have a boring life (i'm sure all of the typing i do on vj would indict me for carpal tunnel syndrome :lol:)

Excellent points, brother Charles. :thumbs:

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
Too bad that posting in VJ isn't a calorie burner...I'd be skinny as a rail.

...

I think health insurance companies can and should adjust people's premiums based on voluntarily lifestyle habits that are detrimental to their health, but not employers. This is another consequence of having employers taking on the responsibility of our healthcare. If we had universal healthcare in this country - this would be a non-issue with employers.

I thought you hated insurance companies?

edited: See you Bush lovin' types are stuck in this neo-natal view of ....I hate this, I love that. I try to keep my views rooted in rationale, rather than pure emotion.

just go shag Bush and get it over with! Sheesh :lol:

maybe a job as a white house intern is in steven's future.....

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
Too bad that posting in VJ isn't a calorie burner...I'd be skinny as a rail.

...

I think health insurance companies can and should adjust people's premiums based on voluntarily lifestyle habits that are detrimental to their health, but not employers. This is another consequence of having employers taking on the responsibility of our healthcare. If we had universal healthcare in this country - this would be a non-issue with employers.

I thought you hated insurance companies?

edited: See you Bush lovin' types are stuck in this neo-natal view of ....I hate this, I love that. I try to keep my views rooted in rationale, rather than pure emotion.

just go shag Bush and get it over with! Sheesh :lol:

maybe a job as a white house intern is in steven's future.....

mmmm...President Hillary, here's that report you needed.

Posted
Too bad that posting in VJ isn't a calorie burner...I'd be skinny as a rail.

...

I think health insurance companies can and should adjust people's premiums based on voluntarily lifestyle habits that are detrimental to their health, but not employers. This is another consequence of having employers taking on the responsibility of our healthcare. If we had universal healthcare in this country - this would be a non-issue with employers.

I thought you hated insurance companies?

edited: See you Bush lovin' types are stuck in this neo-natal view of ....I hate this, I love that. I try to keep my views rooted in rationale, rather than pure emotion.

Steve the only roots you have are the ones you eat. Your self proclaiming rationale is based on irrational thinking. Such as global warming is gonna kill us but i'm gonna have a kid. Rational? Absolutely not. Whats your favorite tool? Let me guess a monkey wrench.

"I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine."- Ayn Rand

“Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.”

― Andrew Wilkow

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
Too bad that posting in VJ isn't a calorie burner...I'd be skinny as a rail.

...

I think health insurance companies can and should adjust people's premiums based on voluntarily lifestyle habits that are detrimental to their health, but not employers. This is another consequence of having employers taking on the responsibility of our healthcare. If we had universal healthcare in this country - this would be a non-issue with employers.

I thought you hated insurance companies?

edited: See you Bush lovin' types are stuck in this neo-natal view of ....I hate this, I love that. I try to keep my views rooted in rationale, rather than pure emotion.

Steve the only roots you have are the ones you eat. Your self proclaiming rationale is based on irrational thinking. Such as global warming is gonna kill us but i'm gonna have a kid. Rational? Absolutely not. Whats your favorite tool? Let me guess a monkey wrench.

Marc, let's be honest. You're one of the most emotional posters here - it comes beaming through in your posts. I'm sure I'm not the first one to tell you that you tend react first and then think about it later. That's okay, along as you are aware of it when forming political opinions. I'd recommend staying away from talk radio like Savage, O'Reilly and Limbaugh, because they thrive on emotional saps like you.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline
Posted

I'm not just saying this because I'm fat... but this is a bad, bad, BAD idea and a huge invasion of personal privacy. Not to mention overt discrimination. If I was one of their employees I'd be calling out the lawyers because they can't be allowed to get away with it! If they are allowed to discriminate against people in this way, what's next? Besides, are they going to fine the anorexics and bulimics they're going to be helping to create? How about the arthritics? People with mental health issues? People who indulge in dangerous sports? People who drive fast cars/speed? Where does it stop?

Karen - Melbourne, Australia/John - Florida, USA

- Proposal (20 August 2000) to marriage (19 December 2004) - 4 years, 3 months, 25 days (1,578 days)

STAGE 1 - Applying for K1 (15 September 2003) to K1 Approval (13 July 2004) - 9 months, 29 days (303 days)

STAGE 2A - Arriving in US (4 Nov 2004) to AOS Application (16 April 2005) - 5 months, 13 days (164 days)

STAGE 2B - Applying for AOS to GC Approval - 9 months, 4 days (279 days)

STAGE 3 - Lifting Conditions. Filing (19 Dec 2007) to Approval (December 11 2008)

STAGE 4 - CITIZENSHIP (filing under 5-year rule - residency start date on green card Jan 11th, 2006)

*N400 filed December 15, 2011

*Interview March 12, 2012

*Oath Ceremony March 23, 2012.

ALL DONE!!!!!!!!

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Nigeria
Timeline
Posted

I am going to have to say that I disagree with fining people for being "obese" as calculated by the BMI. They should measure the percentage of body fat if they want to know if someone is really obese.

Now, as for being skinny = being healthy. I have MAJOR opinions on that. Research has shown that a "fat" person who exercises regularly is more healthy than a "skinny" person who does not exercise regularly.

I am overweight. And yet I exercise regularly. I don't eat ANY sugar, fast foods or "junk foods." I eat a diet high in fiber with lots of fruits and veggies and lean meats. And yet, I am still overweight.

Am I less healthy just because my BMI is high? Does that mean a person who has a BMI of 24, but who doesn't exercise and eats fast food and junk food, is healthier than I am just because they have a low BMI?

THAT'S A LOAD OF #######!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I-129F

11/15/2007 = Package sent overnight Fedex to CSC

11/16/2007 = Package arrived at CSC

11/21/2007 = NOA1 (according to www.uscis.gov online case status)

11/26/2007 = Check cashed (YIPPEE!!!!!!!!!!)

11/28/2007 = Touched

11/30/2007 = Rec'd NOA1 hard copy in the mail

12/20/2007 = Touched

12/21/2007 = Touched

03/12/2008 = Touched (due to phone call)

03/24/2008 = NOA2!!!!!!!!!

03/25/2008 = Touched

04/23/2008 = Touched

05/05/2008 = Arrived at Consulate

05/12/2008 = Picked up Packets 3 & 4

06/24/2008 = Interview Date and APPROVAL

07/02/2008 = Picked up Visa at Embassy

07/05/2008 = Arrival in the U.S.!!!!!!!!! Met at POE in ATLANTA

07/06/2008 = Fly back to Salt Lake City Together!!!!

08/06/2008 = MARRIED TODAY!!!

AOS & EAD

08/23/2008 = Package sent via USPS with Signature Confirmation

08/25/2008 = Package arrived in Chicago

08/26/2008 = Check cashed

09/02/2008 = NOA1 for EAD and AOS received in the mail.

4400355_bodyshot_300x400.gif4400923_bodyshot_300x400.gif

Posted
I try to keep my views rooted in rationale, rather than pure emotion.

Enough with the jokes.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...