Jump to content
Max_The_Cat

N-400 is still not approved after the interview

 Share

9 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I had my N-400 interview in October 2023. I successfully passed it but the officer told me she can’t approve it because my I-751 is still pending. It’s been more than 5 months since the interview and nothing has changed: I-751 is still stuck on biometrics and N-400 is on interview scheduled. I submitted an e-request in Feb and got genetic response that the delay is due workload factors not related to my case.

I also reached out to my senator last week, but it did not help. 
Anything else I can do? Any advice would help! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline

You can try the CIS Ombudsman, but if both cases are within normal processing times, they also may not be much help.

 

Good Luck!

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Dashinka said:

You can try the CIS Ombudsman, but if both cases are within normal processing times, they also may not be much help.

 

Good Luck!

N-400 is outside normal processing time, but I-751 is still within the processing time, USCIS doesn't let me submit an e-request for I-751

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OldUser said:

You can sue USCIS for decision 120 after the interview, as allowed by law. Either you can do it yourself or hire lawyer to file Writ Of Mandamus (lawsuit)

I'll look into it, thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PVR Bound said:

But be careful how you word your lawsuit; if you file for a decision on your N400 you may force the USCIS to deny your N400 based on an ongoing I-751. And with the I-751 still within expected processing time.

Agreed, WoM should include decision on I-751 too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
56 minutes ago, OldUser said:

Agreed, WoM should include decision on I-751 too

But the I751 is still within normal processing times, so could a WoM drive a decision there?   To my knowledge there is nothing that drives USCIS to adjudicate the I751 just because an N400 was submitted.  Now for most, the cases are combined and decided at the same time, but there is no requirement that this happen unless someone has more information.

Edited by Dashinka

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Dashinka said:

But the I751 is still within normal processing times, so could a WoM drive a decision there?   To my knowledge there is nothing that drives USCIS to adjudicate the I751 just because an N400 was submitted.  Now for most, the cases are combined and decided at the same time, but there is no requirement that this happen unless someone has more information.

I don't have exact information. I think lawyers specializing in Mandamus (Hacking et al) cite the clause in the law which is says something like "case should be decided in reasonable amount of time". I think published processing times are not legally binding, but the law is open to interpretation, and lawyers claim anything over 12 months is unreasonable. The idea is, USCIS doesn't want to burden IJ as they're too busy, so they decide on case. I'd love to hear from @igoyougoduke

Edited by OldUser
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...