Jump to content

1,317 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
3 hours ago, Salyyen said:

What you mean by notorized it has thier name address and signature 

Notaries notarize signatures, not documents.

 

The following is not legal advice, but the outcome of observation:

 

1.  The witness can put his/her statement in the form of an affidavit, with the notary-certification language included.  The notary can administer a jurat oath whereby the witness shows positive identification (driver's license or other government-issued ID), swears that he/she is the person signing in the presence of the notary, and swears that he/she is signing the affidavit freely/willingly for the purposes stated therein; or

 

2.  The witness can attach a separate page to his/her letter, swearing or acknowledging that the attached letter is his/her truthful statement.  The witness would then sign the separate page in the presence of the notary.

 

After either of the above, the notary would sign and stamp the appropriate page.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Salyyen said:

What you mean by notorized it has thier name address and signature 

They have to take the letter to the notary and make it notarized. UPS notarizes, court has notaries too, you can Google some notaries around you…. your witnesses must have their ID or passport or drivers license before a notary can sign and stamp the letter. A letter without a notary stamp will not be accepted by USCIS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
3 minutes ago, God is a good God said:

They have to take the letter to the notary and make it notarized. UPS notarizes, court has notaries too, you can Google some notaries around you…. your witnesses must have their ID or passport or drivers license before a notary can sign and stamp the letter. A letter without a notary stamp will not be accepted by USCIS

All true, but everyone should be aware of the protocol and format in my post just above.  The notary can get into trouble (and documents can be rejected by agencies or authorities, maybe or maybe not including USCIS) if a notary whips out the notary seal and simply stamps a plain letter.

 

Your bank may have one or more notaries who can notarize customers' signatures at no charge.  UPS stores and other notaries may charge a nominal fee that's authorized by the state where you live.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

Sunday -- time for our Official Weekly VAWA-Thread Joke:

=============================================================
ARE YOU SURE THAT'S ENOUGH?

 

An elderly gentleman went to the local drug store and asked the pharmacist to fill his prescription for Viagra.

 

"How many do you want?" asked the pharmacist.

 

The man replied, "Just a few, maybe half a dozen.  I cut each one into four pieces."

 

Upon hearing that, the pharmacist said, "That's too small a dose.  That won't get you through intercourse."

 

The old fellow said, "Oh, I'm past 90 years old and I don't even think about that.  I just want it to stick out enough so I don't pee on my shoes."

:P 

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2024 at 8:22 PM, God is a good God said:

They have to take the letter to the notary and make it notarized. UPS notarizes, court has notaries too, you can Google some notaries around you…. your witnesses must have their ID or passport or drivers license before a notary can sign and stamp the letter. A letter without a notary stamp will not be accepted by USCIS


is it important to have witnesses? 
Cuse I have police report harassment calls 

and I have the evaluation 

and I have a pic of the physical abuse and statement 

and I have to many good morals from friends 

 

Are these are enough for the rfe to prove the abuse 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: India
Timeline

Dear friends I have a question that if after filing your VAWA case your abuser passed aware will this effect your VAWA case or later be a problem to become a naturalized citizen need some suggestions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Braveheart123 said:

Dear friends I have a question that if after filing your VAWA case your abuser passed aware will this effect your VAWA case or later be a problem to become a naturalized citizen need some suggestions 

Honestly I recommend just getting a lawyer, however in my digging I was able to find this pretty old policy memo:

https://asistahelp.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/DOJ-Policy-MemorandumL-Instruction-Regarding-the-Expanded-Meaning-of-Section-319a-VAWA-natz-memo.pdf

 

Alternatively, less clear but current:

PM Volume 12, Part G, Chapter 3. F.2:
image.png.098e89959efac51526e814dbb6c737fb.png

Highlighted sentence is the relevant one. It is a good question if a corpse remains a US Citizen after death (I believe the answer is no but I really can't be bothered to look). But the PM states that's not a factor.

Contradictions without citations only make you look dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
6 minutes ago, Demise said:

It is a good question if a corpse remains a US Citizen after death (I believe the answer is no but I really can't be bothered to look).

Some corpses continue to vote, years after death.  :lol: 

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Some corpses continue to vote, years after death.  :lol: 

That'd be an interesting argument to make. "No Mr. Immigration Officer, my ex is still alive, yes I know he was buried a year ago but he's still voting every election".

Contradictions without citations only make you look dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: India
Timeline
48 minutes ago, Demise said:

Honestly I recommend just getting a lawyer, however in my digging I was able to find this pretty old policy memo:

https://asistahelp.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/DOJ-Policy-MemorandumL-Instruction-Regarding-the-Expanded-Meaning-of-Section-319a-VAWA-natz-memo.pdf

 

Alternatively, less clear but current:

PM Volume 12, Part G, Chapter 3. F.2:
image.png.098e89959efac51526e814dbb6c737fb.png

Highlighted sentence is the relevant one. It is a good question if a corpse remains a US Citizen after death (I believe the answer is no but I really can't be bothered to look). But the PM states that's not a factor.

Dear freind you have the best knowledge 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: India
Timeline

I got my green card through VAWA at that time I have submitted the drivers license, Social Security, and the voter information of the abuser and based on the information the VAWA unit has verified the citizenship status of the abuser and as a result, First approved my VAWA case And then later on, I got my green card now recently I applied for US citizenship and the officer first question is to show the citizenship status of the abuser and I informed her that that the same has been verified by the VAWA unit moreover there is a special method to mention in chapter 2 of VAWA how to determined the the citizenship status of the abuser further in the in N-400 instructions page 13 it’s mention that the abuser citizenship status is not required if you got your green card through VAWA but despite all these strong arguments I received an RFE to send the naturalization certificate or the passport copy of the abuser which I don’t have to because I was in a hostile situation and that’s why I filed WAVA now my question is there any provision of law where we can request to change the interviwing officer and ask for supervisor review.
all suggestions are Wellcome 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...