Bush committed to tracking al-Qaida

[Heracles 417]

As far as that goes - I'm still no nearer to understanding what your opinion was on that issue. but there we go.

You also have an uncanny ability to dodge a point or question and look for a fault in the sentence structure or something else to divert attention.

Check out my last post from the thread you mentioned.. You dodged the main points completely.

Out of the following http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...t&p=1101083 post; have a look at what you chose to reply too..

Edited August 7, 2007 by Boo-Yah!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

As far as that goes - I'm still no nearer to understanding what your opinion was on that issue. but there we go.

You also have an uncanny ability to dodge a point or question and look for a fault in the sentence structure or something else to divert attention.

Check out my last post from the thread you mentioned.. You dodged the main points completely.

Yeah - because your questions amount to "why does the sun shine".

[Heracles 417]

As far as that goes - I'm still no nearer to understanding what your opinion was on that issue. but there we go.

You also have an uncanny ability to dodge a point or question and look for a fault in the sentence structure or something else to divert attention.

Check out my last post from the thread you mentioned.. You dodged the main points completely.

Yeah - because your questions amount to "why does the sun shine".

Which you never seem to answer directly. If it's so simple answer it for once.

What is your background in again?

Edited August 7, 2007 by Boo-Yah!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

As far as that goes - I'm still no nearer to understanding what your opinion was on that issue. but there we go.

You also have an uncanny ability to dodge a point or question and look for a fault in the sentence structure or something else to divert attention.

Check out my last post from the thread you mentioned.. You dodged the main points completely.

Yeah - because your questions amount to "why does the sun shine".

Which you never seem to answer directly. If it's so simple answer it for once.

What is your background in again?

(sigh) if anything I've never claimed that it was 'simple'.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Last I checked people usually die in wars, its a given. Does that make it a mistake? Of course not. Maybe you could find me Bushes televised speech to Saddam in which he warned him of what would happen if he didnt comply. Bushes fault or Sadams own stupidity? The latter i suspect.

Well we could rehash the same old ###### a dozen times and a dozen different ways - but we'll still arrive at the same twisting of legalities, shifting justifications, and unsubstantiated claims about 'imminent threats' - and no 'war supporting' USC will touch the British government's leaked memo that said explicitly that Bush et al had already made the decision to go to war regardless of all their 'warnings', and were seeking ways to fix the intelligence around the policy. But then you lot never did see the British side of the debate did you?

Well known leaked memo? You gotta copy of this "well known memo"? Who wrote it,where did it come from? Seems you forgot to mention that. Was it leaked intensionally to make Bush look bad?

Oh and your diversion is classic!

Edited August 7, 2007 by CarolsMarc

[Heracles 417]

(sigh) if anything I've never claimed that it was 'simple'.

sorry 'obvious' not simple.

Anyway forget about it. I agree to disagree. No point in going on and on about points we will never come close to seeing eye to eye on.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

We should support our President and his courageous effort to bring Bin Laden to justice.

What courageous effort are you talking about specifically?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Downing Street Memo

Some background

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Downing Street Memo

Some background

Sorry thats not a copy.

Wikipedia's basic premise is built on a pseudo-intellectual concept of collective contributions, on the mistaken belief that since there are lots of people constantly contributing and reviewing entries, they will somehow come out accurate. Chairman Mao would have been proud. Wikipedia cheerleaders believe that the old traditions of mainstream media (fact-checking and professional editing) lack merit, and that an entry that is written by an anonymous contributor, and subsequently reviewed and edited by many other anonymous contributors, will be inherently superior. It's rather like getting a hundred monkeys in a room together and expecting them to produce "Hamlet."

You might get a copy of the original since its so wellknown.

http://www.itworld.com/Tech/2987/nlsblog070306/

[one...two...tree 2,762]

We should support our President and his courageous effort to bring Bin Laden to justice.

What courageous effort are you talking about specifically?

Silence, you unpatriotic gob of communist drivel. All eyes upon thy leader, King George, who is bequeathed the rightful and moral king...who is above all criticism or skepticism. Like brother Marc says, "Just give him a chance, all you armchair warriors."

[smoke20 0]

We should support our President and his courageous effort to bring Bin Laden to justice.

What courageous effort are you talking about specifically?

Silence, you unpatriotic gob of communist drivel. All eyes upon thy leader, King George, who is bequeathed the rightful and moral king...who is above all criticism or skepticism. Like brother Marc says, "Just give him a chance, all you armchair warriors."

good to see you've finally come around steven!

[one...two...tree 2,762]

We should support our President and his courageous effort to bring Bin Laden to justice.

What courageous effort are you talking about specifically?

Silence, you unpatriotic gob of communist drivel. All eyes upon thy leader, King George, who is bequeathed the rightful and moral king...who is above all criticism or skepticism. Like brother Marc says, "Just give him a chance, all you armchair warriors."

good to see you've finally come around steven!

Amen, brother! I was blind, but now I see.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

We should support our President and his courageous effort to bring Bin Laden to justice.

What courageous effort are you talking about specifically?

To condemn ones courage, standing in an audience of bystanders only shows ignorance.

[smoke20 0]

We should support our President and his courageous effort to bring Bin Laden to justice.

What courageous effort are you talking about specifically?

Silence, you unpatriotic gob of communist drivel. All eyes upon thy leader, King George, who is bequeathed the rightful and moral king...who is above all criticism or skepticism. Like brother Marc says, "Just give him a chance, all you armchair warriors."

good to see you've finally come around steven!

Amen, brother! I was blind, but now I see.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

We should support our President and his courageous effort to bring Bin Laden to justice.

What courageous effort are you talking about specifically?

To condemn ones courage, standing in an audience of bystanders only shows ignorance.

Amen, brother Marc! Show that spineless excuse of an American what it REALLY means to be a red blooded American. I'm not afraid to say I love you, brother Marc. You are my idea a true American!