Hackinglaw episode 435 Sudanese son of USC

[manyfudge 291]

What a mess! And Jim is either obtuse or not familiar with children born out of wedlock to USC.

 

18yo boy called when he was 17 - was obvious that his father married his mother when his divorce had not gone through.

Not sure why Jim did not steer him to try to get expedited CRBA or US passport as child of USC while under 18.

 

And also why does Jim not advise them to at least file I130s for the sons while they are under 21.

 

Now I am hooked on the show and feeling annoyed at Jim!

[OldUser 7,010]

I think the situation is not very simple for that young man. Ultimately, I think father wants to petition for mother too. Jim was simply being a laywer, trying not to give quick advice with big consequences.

 

It's likely filing for passport also would have raised more questions about father and his marriages and there wouldn't be guarantee of quick successful resolution.

Edited September 17, 2023 by OldUser

[manyfudge 291]

4 minutes ago, OldUser said:

Ultimately, I think father wants to petition for mother too

Yeah.  But the wiser course would be to just have a son sponsor mom.  
 

And in the meantime, dad marries mom.

 

And Sudanese law is relevant.  Children  of polygamous marriages in Sudan are legitimate.  Something worth looking into.

[OldUser 7,010]

13 minutes ago, manyfudge said:

And Sudanese law is relevant.  Children  of polygamous marriages in Sudan are legitimate.  Something worth looking into.

Same as 420 issue in US immigration. Just because marijuana is legal in a particular state doesn't mean it's not a problem for somebody trying to get an immigration benefit.

Edited September 17, 2023 by OldUser

[manyfudge 291]

Then we are back to getting CRBA in time for out of wedlock son.

[Ontarkie 14,321]

~~Moved to General Immigration DIscussion, as the Topic is about a an attorney's YT video~~

[Timona 4,208]

I got lost listening to him since he first came on board some episodes ago. 

[OldUser 7,010]

27 minutes ago, manyfudge said:

Then we are back to getting CRBA in time for out of wedlock son.

I need to rewatch the show. 

Edited September 17, 2023 by OldUser

[Boiler 45,761]

OK had a look and of course he was wrong.

 

I think the discussion got off on the wrong foot because the caller could not accept his Mother was not married to his Father. I got the impression that there is a lot more to the story, Father seemed missing. His unwillingness to send in documents to the Consulate.

 

Actually there was a worse one, the GC Holder working for the UN.

 

A long time ago I suggested a thread detailing Jim's mistakes, well I would use another word, but it is fun.

 

I have seens a few other YT Lawyers and they all have issues.

[manyfudge 291]

1 minute ago, Boiler said:

the GC Holder working for the UN.

Which episode? I am hooked.

 

Jim is so unbelievably earnest.

[Boiler 45,761]

Same one let me find it.

 

 

[Boiler 45,761]

Actually the Pilot one was interesting, EB2 NIW, flavour of the time. 

[EM_Vandaveer 2,408]

5 hours ago, Boiler said:

Same one let me find it.

 

 

Wow.

A 2-second google search says otherwise:

https://help.cbp.gov/s/article/Article1703?language=en_US#:~:text=Your child is not required,two years of birth%2C and

[manyfudge 291]

9 hours ago, Boiler said:

Pilot

We have a poster on here who DIY a pilot EB2-NIW recently.

[Boiler 45,761]

2 hours ago, manyfudge said:

We have a poster on here who DIY a pilot EB2-NIW recently.

I know it can be done, but Jim implied it was because there is a pilot shortage.

 

We have a School Bus Driver shortage but not likely to get a EB2 NIW.